Abstract
Netherlands Ophthalmic Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands AMC, Graduate School Neurosciences Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands The visual system has to segregate objects that are relevant to behavior from other objects and the background, if they are embedded in a visual scene. This segregation process can be time consuming, especially if the relevant object is spatially extended and overlaps with other image components, but the cause of the delays is presently not well understood. In the present study, we used a curve-tracing task to investigate processing delays during the grouping of contour segments into elongated curves. Our results indicate that contour segments that need to be grouped together are labeled with visual attention. Attention gradually spreads from contour segments that were labeled previously to other contours that are colinear and connected to them. The contour-grouping task is completed as soon as attention is directed to the entire curve. We conclude that processing delays during contour grouping are caused by a time-consuming spread of visual attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., &Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1011–1036.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 448–456.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Egly, R., Driver, J., &Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 161–177.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Field, D. J., Hayes, A., &Hess, R. F. (1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field”.Vision Research,33, 173–193.
Foster, D. H., &Bischof, W. F. (1991). Thresholds from psychometric functions: Superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators.Psychological Bulletin,109, 152–159.
Gigus, Z., &Malik, J. (1991).Detecting curvilinear structure in images (Tech. Rep. No. 91/619). Berkely: University of California, Division of Computer Science. Available at http://www.ucstrl.org:8900/ucstrl/body.html.
Hess, R. F., Beaudot, W. H. A., &Mullen, K. T. (2001). Dynamics of contour integration.Vision Research,41, 1023–1037.
Jolicœur, P., Ullman, S., &MacKay, M. (1986). Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations.Memory & Cognition,14, 129–140.
Jolicœur, P., Ullman, S., &MacKay, M. (1991). Visual curve tracing properties.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 997–1022.
Kovács, I., &Julesz, B. (1993). A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,90, 7495–7497.
Maunsell, J. H. R. (1995). The brain’s visual world: Representation of visual targets in cerebral cortex.Science,270, 764–769.
McCormick, P. A., &Jolicoeur, P. (1991). Predicting the shape of distance functions in curve tracing: Evidence for a zoom lens operator.Memory & Cognition,19, 469–486.
Moran, J., &Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in extrastriate cortex.Science,229, 782–784.
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 283–290.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., &Vetterling, W. T. (1986).Numerical recipes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pringle, R., &Egeth, H. E. (1988). Mental curve tracing with elementary stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 716–728.
Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., &Spekreijse, H. (1998). Objectbased attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey.Nature,395, 376–381.
Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F., &Spekreijse, H. (2000). The implementation of visual routines.Vision Research,40, 1385–1411.
Roelfsema, P. R., Scholte, H. S., &Spekreijse, H. (1999). Temporal constraints on the grouping of contour segments into spatially extended objects.Vision Research,39, 1509–1529.
Roelfsema, P. R., &Spekreijse, H. (1999). Correlates of a gradual spread of attention over a traced curve in macaque area V1.Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,25, 7.2.
Scholte, H. S., Spekreijse, H., &Roelfsema, P. R. (2001). The spatial profile of visual attention in mental curve tracing.Vision Research,41, 2569–2580.
Thompson, B. (1993). The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives.Journal of Experimental Education,61, 361–377.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., &Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 693–716.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant from the McDonnell Pew Program in Cognitive Neuroscience.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houtkamp, R., Spekreijse, H. & Roelfsema, P.R. A gradual spread of attention. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 1136–1144 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194840
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194840