Abstract
Four experiments were conducted to explore outcome-specific transfer from causal predictive judgments to instrumental responding. A video game was designed in which participants had to defend Andalusia from navy and air force attacks. First, they learned the relationship between two instrumental responses (two keys on a standard keyboard) and two different outcomes (destruction of the ships or destruction of the planes). Then they learned to predict which of two different stimuli predicted which outcome. Finally, they had the opportunity of making either of the two instrumental responses in the presence of either stimulus. Transfer was shown as a preference for the response that shared an outcome with the current stimulus. The presentation of the stimulus during the test produced a decrease in the overall rate of response. Responding to a neutral stimulus in Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that this overall decrease in responding was due to a combination of the time needed to process the meaning of the stimulus and the activation of the representation of the outcome in the presence of the stimulus during the test. Transfer between predictive judgments and instrumental responding mirrors the outcome-specific Pavlovian instrumental transfer observed in conditioning studies with rats.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, L. G. (1980). A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,15, 147–149.
Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review,104, 367–405.
Cheng, P. W., &Novic, L. R. (1990). A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,58, 545–567.
Cheng, P. W., &Novic, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction.Psychological Review,99, 365–382.
Colwill, R. M. (1993). An associative analysis of instrumental learning.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2, 111–116.
Colwill, R. M. (1994). Associative representations of instrumental contingencies. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 31, pp. 1–72). San Diego: Academic Press.
Colwill, R. M., &Motzkin, D. K. (1994). Encoding of the unconditioned stimulus in Pavlovian conditioning.Animal Learning & Behavior,22, 384–394.
Colwill, R. M., &Rescorla, R. A. (1988). Associations between the discriminative stimulus and the reinforcer in instrumental learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 155–164.
Delamater, A. R. (1995). Outcome-selective effects of intertrial reinforcement in a Pavlovian appetitive conditioning paradigm with rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 31–39.
Delamater, A. R. (1996). Effects of several extinction treatments upon the integrity of Pavlovian stimulus-outcome associations.Animal Learning & Behavior,24, 437–449.
Dickinson, A. (2001). Causal learning: An associative analysis (The 28th Bartlett Memorial Lecture).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54B, 3–26.
Dickinson, A., &Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgments.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49B, 60–80.
Dickinson, A., &Shanks, D. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgment. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 229–261). San Diego: Academic Press.
Gallistel, C. R. (1990).The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kruse, J. M., Overmier, J. B., Konz, W. A., &Rokke, E. (1983). Pavlovian conditioned stimulus effects upon instrumental choice behavior are reinforcer specific.Learning & Motivation,14, 165–181.
Paredes-Olay, C., &Rosas, J. M. (1999). Within-subjects extinction and renewal in predictive judgments.Psicológica,20, 195–210.
Rescorla, R. A. (1991). Associations of multiple outcomes with an instrumental response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 465–474.
Rescorla, R. A. (1992a). Associations between an instrumental discriminative stimulus and multiple outcomes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 95–104.
Rescorla, R. A. (1992b). Response-independent outcome presentation can leave instrumental R-O association intact.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 104–111.
Rescorla, R. A. (1993a). Inhibitory associations between S and R in extinction.Animal Learning & Behavior,21, 327–336.
Rescorla, R. A. (1993b). Preservation of response-outcome associations through extinction.Animal Learning & Behavior,21, 238–245.
Rescorla, R. A. (1994). Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,20, 44–50.
Rescorla, R. A. (1996a). Preservation of Pavlovian associations through extinction.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49B, 245–258.
Rescorla, R. A. (1996b). Response-outcome association remains functional through interference treatments.Animal Learning & Behavior,24, 450–458.
Rosas, J. M., Vila, N. J., Lugo, M., &López, L. (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval upon interference in causality judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,27, 153–164.
Shanks, D. R. (1993). Human instrumental learning: A critical review of data and theory.British Journal of Psychology,84, 319–354.
Shanks, D. R. (1995).The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shanks, D. R., Holyoak, K. J., &Medin, D. L. (Eds.) (1996).The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning. San Diego: Academic Press.
Vila, N. J., &Rosas, J. M. (2001a). Reinstatement of acquisition performance by presentation of the outcome after extinction in causality judgments.Behavioural Processes,56, 147–154.
Vila, N. J., &Rosas, J. M. (2001b). Renewal and spontaneous recovery after extinction in a causal learning task.Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis,27, 79–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was funded by the research group HUM642 from the Junta de Andalucía, Spain. We thank Juan Espinosa and Ana García for their help in running the experiments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paredes-Olay, C., Abad, M.J.F., Gámez, M. et al. Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding. Animal Learning & Behavior 30, 239–248 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192833
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192833