Abstract
When encountering familiar scenes, observers can use item-specific memory to facilitate the guidance of attention to objects appearing in known locations or configurations. Here, we investigated how memory for relational contingencies that emerge across different scenes can be exploited to guide attention. Participants searched for letter targets embedded in pictures of bedrooms. In a between-subjects manipulation, targets were either always on a bed pillow or randomly positioned. When targets were systematically located within scenes, search for targets became more efficient. Importantly, this learning transferred to bedrooms without pillows, ruling out learning that is based on perceptual contingencies. Learning also transferred to living room scenes, but it did not transfer to kitchen scenes, even though both scene types contained pillows. These results suggest that statistical regularities abstracted across a range of stimuli are governed by semantic expectations regarding the presence of target-predicting local landmarks. Moreover, explicit awareness of these contingencies led to a central tendency bias in recall memory for precise target positions that is similar to the spatial category effects observed in landmark memory. These results broaden the scope of conditions under which contextual cuing operates and demonstrate how semantic memory plays a causal and independent role in the learning of associations between objects in real-world scenes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baldwin, D., Andersson, A., Saffran, J., & Meyer, M. (2008). Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure. Cognition, 106, 1382–1407.
Brady, T. F., & Oliva, A. (2008). Statistical learning using real-world scenes: Extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychological Science, 19, 678–685.
Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cuing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 699–706.
Brockmole, J. R., Hambrick, D. Z., Windisch, D. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The role of meaning in contextual cuing: Evidence from chess expertise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1886–1896.
Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006a). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cuing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1177–1187.
Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006b). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99–108.
Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 753–763.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360–365.
Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2008). Associative learning mechanisms in vision. In S. J. Luck & A. R. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 209–245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crist, R. E., Kapadia, M. K., Westheimer, G., & Gilbert, C. D. (1997). Perceptual learning of spatial localization: Specificity for orientation, position, and context. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2889–2894.
Davenport, J. L. (2007). Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35, 393–401.
Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559–564.
De Graef, P., Christiaens, D., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317–329.
Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17, 973–980.
Ehinger, K. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1366–1378.
Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499–504.
Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 458–467.
Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2005). Encoding multielement scenes: Statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 521–537.
Friedman, A., & Liebelt, L. S. (1981). On the time course of viewing pictures with a view towards remembering. In D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 137–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13, 520–525.
Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2005). Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1252–1268.
Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2007). Contextual cuing based on specific and categorical properties of the environment. Visual Cognition, 15, 257–275.
Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2009). Semantic contextual cuing and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 50–71.
Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 210–228.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categoriesand particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.
Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105–1124.
Jiang, Y., & Song, J.-H. (2005). Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: Learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1439–1448.
Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35-B42.
Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 816–828.
Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 333–352.
Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research, 46, 614–621.
Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1299–1313.
Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273–302.
Peterson, M. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239–1249.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 156–163.
Smyth, A. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2008). Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory & Cognition, 36, 403–415.
Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207–222.
Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. N. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19, 73–74.
Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in realworld scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766–786.
Turk-Browne, N. B., Isola, P. J., Scholl, B. J., & Treat, T. A. (2008). Multidimensional visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 399–407.
Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552–564.
Turk-Browne, N. B., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Flexible visual statistical learning: Transfer across space and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 195–202.
Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2009). Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1934–1945.
Võ, M. L.-H., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3, Art. 24), 1–15.
Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brockmole, J.R., Le-Hoa Võ, M. Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1803–1813 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1803
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1803