Abstract
In this study, we investigated the influence of tonal relatedness on pitch perception in melodies. Tonal expectations for target tones were manipulated in melodic contexts while controlling sensory expectations, thus allowing us to assess specifically the influence of tonal expectations on pitch perception. Three experiments provided converging evidence that tonal relatedness modulates pitch perception in nonmusician listeners. Experiment 1 showed, with a rating task, the influence of the tonal relatedness of a target tone on listeners’ judgments of tuning/mistuning. Experiment 2 showed, with a priming task, that pitch processing of in-tune tones was faster for tonally related targets than for less related targets. Experiment 3 showed, with a comparison task, that discrimination performance for small mistunings was better when the to-be-compared tones were tonally related to the melodic context. Findings are discussed in relation to psychoacoustic research on contextual pitch perception and to studies showing facilitation of early processing steps via knowledge- and attention-related processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bharucha, J. J. (1984). Event hierarchies, tonal hierarchies, and assimilation: A reply to Deutsch and Dowling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 421–425.
Bharucha, J. J. (1996). Melodic anchoring. Music Perception, 13, 383–400.
Bharucha, J. J., & Stoeckig, K. (1986). Reaction time and musical expectancy: Priming of chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 403–410.
Bharucha, J. J., & Stoeckig, K. (1987). Priming of chords: Spreading activation or overlapping frequency spectra? Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 519–524.
Bigand, E. (1997). Perceiving musical stability: The effect of tonal structure, rhythm, and musical expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 808–822.
Bigand, E., Madurell, F., Tillmann, B., & Pineau, M. (1999). Effect of global structure and temporal organization on chord processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 184–197.
Bigand, E., & Pineau, M. (1997). Global context effects on musical expectancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1098–1107.
Bigand, E., Poulin, B., Tillmann, B., Madurell, F., & D’Adamo, D. A. (2003). Sensory versus cognitive components in harmonic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 159–171.
Bigand, E., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2006). Are we “experienced listener”? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training. Cognition, 100, 100–130.
Bigand, E., Tillmann, B., Poulin, B., D’Adamo, D. A., & Madurell, F. (2001). The effect of harmonic context on phoneme monitoring in vocal music. Cognition, 81, B11-B20.
Bigand, E., Tillmann, B., Poulin-Charronnat, B., & Manderlier, D. (2005). Repetition priming: Is music special? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1347–1375.
Brattico, E., Näätänen, R., & Tervaniemi, M. (2001). Context effects on pitch perception in musicians and nonmusicians: Evidence from event-related-potential recordings. Music Perception, 19, 199–222.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cohen, J. [D.], MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271. [For current OS X version, see psy.ck.sissa.it]
Correa, Á., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116–128.
Correa,Á., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 328–334.
Dowling, W. J., Kwak, S., & Andrews, M. W. (1995). The time course of recognition of novel melodies. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 136–149.
Dowling, W. J., Tillmann, B., & Ayers, D. F. (2001). Memory and the experience of hearing music. Music Perception, 19, 249–276.
Escoffier, N., & Tillmann, B. (2008). The tonal function of a task-irrelevant chord modulates speed of visual processing. Cognition, 107, 1070–1083.
Francès, R. (1988). The perception of music (W. J. Dowling, Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1958)
Frankland, B., & Cohen, A. J. (1990). Expectancy profiles generated by major scales: Group differences in ratings and reaction time. Psychomusicology, 9, 173–192.
Geringer, J. M., & Madsen, C. K. (1984). Pitch and tempo discrimination in recorded orchestral music among musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 195–204.
Giard, M.-H., Fort, A., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., & Pernier, J. (2000). Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5, D84-D94.
Gottselig, J. M., Brandeis, D., Hofer-Tinguely, G., Borbély, A. A., & Achermann, P. (2004). Human central auditory plasticity associated with tone sequence learning. Learning & Memory, 11, 162–171.
Green, T. J., & McKeown, J. D. (2001). Capture of attention in selective frequency listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1197–1210.
Greenberg, G. Z., & Larkin, W. D. (1968). Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: The probe-signal method. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1513–1523.
Hafter, E. R., Schlauch, R. S., & Tang, J. (1993). Attending to auditory filters that were not stimulated directly. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 743–747.
Hawkins, H. L., Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., Mouloua, M., Downing, C. J., & Woodward, D. P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 802–811.
Hébert, S., Peretz, I., & Gagnon, L. (1995). Perceiving the tonal ending of tune excerpts: The roles of pre-existing representation and musical expertise. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 193–209.
Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science, 182, 177–180.
Howard, J. H., Jr., O’Toole, A. J., Parasuraman, R., & Bennett, K. B. (1984). Pattern-directed attention in uncertain-frequency detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 256–264.
Johnston, H. M., & Jones, M. R. (2006). Higher order pattern structure influences auditory representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 2–17.
Jones, M. R. (1987). Dynamic pattern structure in music: Recent theory and research. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 621–634.
Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459–491.
Jones, M. R., Johnston, H. M., & Puente, J. (2006). Effects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 59–96.
Justus, T. C., & Bharucha, J. J. (2001). Modularity in musical processing: The automaticity of harmonic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1000–1011.
Kauramäki, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., & Sams, M. (2007). Selective attention increases both gain and feature selectivity of the human auditory cortex.PLoS ONE, 2, e909. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000909.
Krohn, K. I., Brattico, E., Välimäki, V., & Tervaniemi, M. (2006). Neural representations of the hierarchical scale pitch structure. Music Perception, 24, 281–296.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1979). The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 346–374.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lange, K., Krämer, U. M., & Röder, B. (2006). Attending points in time and space. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 130–140.
Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2003). Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an attended moment in time: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 40, 806–817.
Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M. G., Clark, V. P., & Hawkins, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 887–904.
Lynch, M. P., & Eilers, R. E. (1992). A study of perceptual development for musical tuning. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 599–608.
McClelland, J. L., Mirman, D., & Holt, L. L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 363–369.
McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (2006). Are there really interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 533.
Micheyl, C., Delhommeau, K., Perrot, X., & Oxenham, A. J. (2006). Influence of musical and psychoacoustical training on pitch discrimination. Hearing Research, 219, 36–47.
Mirman, D., McClelland, J. L., & Holt, L. L. (2006). Response to McQueen et al.: Theoretical and empirical arguments support interactive processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 534.
Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164.
Samuel, A. G. (2001). Knowing a word affects the fundamental perception of the sounds within it. Psychological Science, 12, 348–351.
Scharf, B. (1998). Auditory attention: The psychoacoustical approach. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 75–117). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Scharf, B., Quigley, S., Aoki, C., Peachey, N., & Reeves, A. (1987). Focused auditory attention and frequency selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 215–223.
Schellenberg, E. G., Adachi, M., Purdy, K. T., & McKinnon, M. C. (2002). Expectancy in melody: Tests of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 511–537.
Swets, J. A. (1973). The relative operating characteristic in psychology. Science, 182, 990–1000.
Tanner, W., & Norman, R. (1954). The human use of information: II. Signal detection for the case of an unknown signal parameter. Transactions of the Institute of Radio Engineering, Professional Group on Information Theory, 4, 222–227.
Tekman, H. G., & Bharucha, J. J. (1992). Time course of chord priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 33–39.
Tillmann, B., Bharucha, J. J., & Bigand, E. (2000). Implicit learning of tonality: A self-organizing approach. Psychological Review, 107, 885–913.
Tillmann, B., & Bigand, E. (2004). Musical priming: Schematic expectations resist repetition priming. In S. D. Lipscomb, R. Ashley, R. O. Gjerdingen, & P. Webster (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 674–676). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.
Tillmann, B., Bigand, E., Escoffier, N., & Lalitte, P. (2006). The influence of musical relatedness on timbre discrimination. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 343–358.
Tillmann, B., Bigand, E., & Pineau, M. (1998). Effects of global Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 470–482.
Verde, M. F., Macmillan, N. A., & Rotello, C. M. (2006). Measures of sensitivity based on a single hit rate and false alarm rate: The accuracy, precision, and robustness of d’, Az, and A’. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 643–654.
Warrier, C. M., Belin, P., Merlet, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (1999). fMRI study examining effect of melodic context on pitch discrimination. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 25, 1629.
Warrier, C. M., & Zatorre, R. J. (2002). Influence of tonal context and timbral variation on perception of pitch. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 198–207.
Watson, C. S., & Foyle, D. C. (1985). Central factors in the discrimination and identification of complex sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78, 375–380.
Watson, C. S., Kelly, W. J., & Wroton, H. W. (1976). Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns: II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 1176–1186.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marmel, F., Tillmann, B. & Dowling, W.J. Tonal expectations influence pitch perception. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 841–852 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.5.841
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.5.841