Abstract
Spatial judgments are affected by both fine-grained and categorical knowledge. We investigated whether, and how, the two forms of knowledge are learned in real-world, navigable space, as well as the time course of learning each type of knowledge. Participants were Northwestern University undergraduates who estimated the locations of buildings and other landmarks on campus. The Northwestern campus is roughly divided into three regions whose borders are not easy to discern, either from a map or by navigation. Nevertheless, students often refer to these regions linguistically and use them when making housing decisions, choosing classes, and so forth. We found that knowledge of both the fine-grained configuration of locations and the regional distinctions increased with time. However, regional influences on judgments occurred later in students’ time on campus. Consequently, computed distances across the nonexistent border between north and south campus locations became more biased with time. The results have implications for understanding how spatial representations develop in navigable environments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acredolo, L. P. (1981). Small- and large-scale spatial concepts in infancy and childhood. In L. S. Liben, A. H. Patterson, & N. Newcombe (Eds.), Spatial representation and behavior across the life span (pp. 63–81). New York: Academic Press.
Carbon, C.-C., & Leder, H. (2005). The Wall inside the brain: Over-estimation of distances crossing the former Iron Curtain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 746–750.
Cheng, K., Shettleworth, S. J., Huttenlocher, J., & Rieser, J. J. (2007). Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 625–637.
DeLoache, J. S. (1989). Young children’s understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space. Cognitive Development, 4, 121–139. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(89)90012-9
DeLoache, J. S. (2000). Dual representation and young children’s use of scale models. Child Development, 71, 329–338.
Friedman, A. (2009). The role of categories and spatial cuing in global-scale location estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 35, 94–112. doi:10.1037/a0013590
Friedman, A., & Brown, N. R. (2000a). Reasoning about geography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 193–219.
Friedman, A., & Brown, N. R. (2000b). Updating geographical knowledge: Principles of coherence and inertia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 900–914.
Friedman, A., Kerkman, D. D., Brown, N. R., Stea, D., & Cappello, H. M. (2005). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in North Americans’ geographic location judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1054–1060.
Friedman, A., & Kohler, B. (2003). Bidimensional regression: Assessing the configural similarity and accuracy of cognitive maps and other two-dimensional data sets. Psychological Methods, 8, 468–491.
Friedman, A., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Global-scale location and distance estimates: Common representations and strategies in absolute and relative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 333–346. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.333
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152–158.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45–56.
Hauser, M. D. (2009). The possibility of impossible cultures. Nature, 460, 190–196.
Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. S. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370, 57–59.
Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. S. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195–232.
Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory & Cognition, 13, 208–217.
Holyoak, K. J., & Mah, W. A. (1982) Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 328–352.
Hund, A. M., & Plumert, J. M. (2002). Delay-induced bias in children’s memory for location. Child Development, 73, 829–840. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00441
Hund, A. M., & Plumert, J. M. (2003). Does information about what things are influence children’s memory for where things are? Developmental Psychology, 39, 939–947.
Hund, A. M., & Plumert, J. M. (2005). The stability and flexibility of spatial categories. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 1–44.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., Corrigan, B., & Crawford, L. E. (2004). Spatial categories and the estimation of location. Cognition, 93, 75–97. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.006
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.352
Huttenlocher, J., Newcombe, N., & Sandberg, E. H. (1994). The coding of spatial location in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 115–147. doi:10.1006/cogp.1994.1014
Kerkman, D. D., Friedman, A., Brown, N. R., Stea, D., & Carmichael, A. (2003). The development of geographic categories and biases. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 265–285.
Kitchin, R. M., & Fotheringham, A. S. (1997). Aggregation issues in cognitive mapping. The Professional Geographer, 49, 269–280.
Learmonth, A. E., Newcombe, N. S., Sheridan, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Why size counts: Children’s spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures. Developmental Science, 11, 414–426.
Liben, L. S. (2003). Extending space: Exploring the territory of spatial development. Human Development, 46, 61–68. doi:10.1159/000067777
Loftus, G., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
Maki, R. H. (1981). Categorization and distance effects with spatial linear orders. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 15–32.
McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 87–121.
McNamara, T. P., Rump, W., & Werner, S. (2003). Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 589–595.
Montello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 312–321). Berlin: Springer.
Mou, W., McNamara, T. P., Valiquette, C. M., & Rump, B. (2004). Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 142–157.
Mou, W., Zhao, M., & McNamara, T. P. (2007). Layout geometry in the selection of intrinsic frames of reference from multiple viewpoints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 145–154.
Newcombe, N. S., & Chiang, N. C.-R. (2007). Learning geographical information from hypothetical maps. Memory & Cognition, 35, 895–909.
Newcombe, N., & Liben, L. S. (1982). Barrier effects in the cognitive maps of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 46–58.
Plumert, J. M., & Hund, A. M. (2001). The development of memory for location: What role do spatial prototypes play? Child Development, 72, 370–384. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00284
Simmering, V. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2007). Carving up space at imaginary joints: Can people mentally impose arbitrary spatial category boundaries? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 871–894. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.871
Spencer, J. P., & Hund, A. M. (2002). Prototypes and particulars: Geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 16–37. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.16
Spencer, J. P., Simmering, V. R., & Schutte, A. R. (2006). Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: Geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 473–490.
Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437.
Tobler, W. R. (1965). Computation of the correspondence of geographical patterns. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15, 131–139.
Tobler, W. R. (1994). Bidimensional regression. Geographical Analysis, 26, 187–212.
Waller, D., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 1051–1063.
Wenderoth, P., & van der Zwan, R. (1991). Local and global mechanisms of one- and two-dimensional orientation illusions. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 321–332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSF Grant SBE-0541957, the Spatial Intelligence and Learning Center, to D.H.U., and a Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to A.F.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uttal, D.H., Friedman, A., Hand, L.L. et al. Learning fine-grained and category information in navigable real-world space. Mem Cogn 38, 1026–1040 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1026
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1026