Abstract
The idea that memory is not unitary but is instead composed of multiple systems has a long history and has been debated with particular vigor in the last 20 years. Nevertheless, whether or not there are multiple memory systems remains unsettled. In this article, we suggest that psychologists wishing to classify memory can learn from biological systematics, the discipline that creates taxonomies of species. In so doing, we suggest that psychologists have made two assumptions in classifying memory: that features of memory are perfectly correlated, and that there is a straightforward mapping between taxonomy and theory. We argue that these assumptions are likely to be incorrect, but we also argue that there is a place for taxonomy in the study of memory. Taxonomies of memory are organizational schemes for data—they are descriptive, not explanatory-and so can inspire theory, although they cannot serve as theories themselves.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249–277.
Baddeley, A. D. (1966). The capacity for generating information by randomization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 119–129.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D., & Warrington, E. K. (1970). Amnesia and the distinction between long- and short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 176–189.
Baum, D. A., & Larson, A. (1991). Adaptation reviewed: A phylogenetic methodology for studying character macroevolution. Systematic Zoology, 40, 1–18.
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociation among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 657–668.
Blaxton, T. A. (1999). Combining disruption and activation techniques to map conceptual and perceptual memory processes in the human brain. In J. K. Foster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: Structure, function, or process? (pp. 104–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brady, R. H. (1985). On the independence of systematics. Cladistics, 1, 113–126.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12–21.
Cermak, L. S., & Reale, L. (1978). Depth of processing and retention of words by alcoholic Korsakoff patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 165–174.
Challis, B. H., & Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 595–607.
Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 844–847.
Cohen, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, N. J., Poldrack, R. A., & Eichenbaum, H. (1997). Memory for items and memory for relations in the procedural/declarative memory framework. Memory, 5, 131–178.
Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and patternanalyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210, 207–210.
Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429–432.
Corkin, S. (1968). Acquisition of motor skill after bilateral medial temporal lobe excision. Neuropsychologia, 6, 255–265.
Craik, F. I., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.
Crisci, J. V., & Steussy, T. F. (1980). Determining primitive character states for phylogenetic reconstruction. Systematic Botany, 5, 112–135.
de Pinna, M. C. (1991). Concepts and tests of homology and the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics, 7, 367–394.
Dienes, Z., & Berry, D. (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 3–23.
Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. Psychological Review, 95, 91–101.
Estabrook, G. F. (1972). Cladistic methodology: A discussion of the theoretical basis for the induction of evolutionary history. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 3, 427–456.
Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomics of human performance. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Foster, J. K., & Jelicic, M. (1999). Memory: Systems, process, or function? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 87–115.
Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1999). The architecture of human memory. In J. K. Foster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: Structure, function, or process? (pp. 205–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 501–518.
Graf, P., Squire, L. R., & Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 164–178.
Green, R. E. A., & Shanks, D. R. (1993). On the existence of independent explicit and implicit learning systems: An examination of some evidence. Memory & Cognition, 21, 304–317.
Hayes, B. K., & Hennessy, R. (1996). The nature and development of nonverbal implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 22–43.
Heindel, W. C., Salmon, D. P., Shults, C. W., Walicke, P. A., & Butters, N. (1989). Neuropsychological evidence for multiple implicit memory systems: A comparison of Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s disease patients. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 582–587.
Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Hintzman, D. L. (1990). Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 109–140.
Hirst, W. (1982). The amnesic syndrome: Descriptions and explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 435–460.
Howe, M. L., Rabinowitz, F. M., & Grant, M. J. (1993). On measuring (in)dependence of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 100, 737–747.
Huppert, F. A., & Piercy, M. (1982). In search of the functional locus of amnesic syndromes. In L. S. Cermak (Ed.), Human memory and amnesia (pp. 123–137). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340.
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
Johnson, L.A.S. (1970). Rainbow’s end: The quest for an optimal taxonomy. Systematic Zoology, 19, 203–239.
Keane, M. M., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Fenneman, A. C., Growdon, J. H., & Corkin, S. (1991). Evidence for a dissociation between perceptual and conceptual priming in Alzheimer’s disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 326–342.
Keppel, G., & Underwood, B. J. (1962). Proactive inhibition in shortterm retention of single items. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1, 153–161.
Knopman, D. (1991). Unaware learning versus preserved learning in pharmacologic amnesia: Similarities and differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 1017–1029.
Kolers, P. A., & Roediger, H. L., III (1984). Procedures of mind. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 425–449.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 47–60.
Kosslyn, S. M., & Van Kleeck, M. (1990). Broken brains and normal minds: Why humpty-dumpty needs a skeleton. In E. Schwartz (Ed.), Computational neuroscience (pp. 390–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maslin, T. P. (1952). Morphological criteria of phyletic relationships. Systematic Zoology, 1, 49–70.
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mayr, E. (1969). Principles of systematic zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1995). How should implicit memory phenomena be modeled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 777–784.
Melton, A. W. (1963). Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 2, 1–21.
Metcalfe, J., Cottrell, G. W., & Mencl, W. E. (1992). Cognitive binding: A computational-modeling analysis of a distinction between implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 289–298.
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons of other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 269–310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moscovitch, M., & Umiltà, C. (1991). Conscious and nonconscious aspects of memory: A neuropsychological framework of modules and central systems. In. R. G. Lister & H. J. Weingartner (Eds.), Perspectives in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 229–266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nadel, L. (1994). Multiple memory systems: What and why, an update. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 39–63). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Naito, M. (1990). Repetition priming in children and adults: Age-related dissociation between implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 462–484.
Neely, J. H. (1989). Experimental dissociations and the episodic/semantic memory distinction. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 229–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nissen, M. J., Willingham, D. B., & Hartman, M. (1989). Explicit and implicit remembering: When is learning preserved in amnesia? Neuropsychologia, 27, 341–352.
Nyberg, L., & Tulving, E. (1996). Classifying human long-term memory: Evidence from converging dissociations. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 163–183.
O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Olton, D. S. (1989). Inferring psychological dissociations from experimental dissociations: The temporal context of episodic memory. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 161–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ostergaard, A. L. (1999). Priming deficits in amnesia: Now you see them, now you don’t. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 175–190.
Ostergaard, A. L., & Jernigan, T. L. (1993). Are word priming and explicit memory mediated by different brain structures? In P. Graf & M. Masson (Eds.), Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 327–349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perruchet, P., & Amorim, M.-A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 18, 785–800.
Perruchet, P., Bigand, E., & Benoit-Gonin, F. (1997). The emergence of explicit knowledge during the early phase of learning in sequential reaction time tasks. Psychological Research, 60, 4–13.
Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198.
Platnick, N. I. (1980). Philosophy and the transformation of cladistics. Systematic Zoology, 28, 537–546.
Poldrack, R. A. (1996). On testing for stochastic dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 434–448.
Price, C. J., Mummery, C. J., Moore, C. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Friston, K. J. (1999). Delineating necessary and sufficient neural systems with functional imaging studies of neuropsychological patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 371–382.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16–45.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1995). Bias in the priming of object decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 754–767.
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1996). Bias effects in implicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 403–421.
Reber, P. J., & Squire, L. R. (1994). Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. Learning & Memory, 1, 217–229.
Ridley, M. (1986). Evolution and classification. London: Longman.
Robbins, T. W. (1996). Refining the taxonomy of memory. Science, 273, 1353–1354.
Roediger, H. L., III (1990). Implicit memory: A commentary. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 373–380.
Roediger, H. L., III, Buckner, R., & McDermott, K. B. (1999). Components of processing. In J. K. Foster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: Structure, function, or process? (pp. 31–65). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roediger, H. L., III, Rajaram, S., & Srinivas, K. (1990). Specifying criteria for postulating memory systems. In A. Diamond (Ed.), The development and neural bases of higher cognitive function (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 608, pp. 572–595). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Russo, R., Nichelli, P., Gibertoni, M., & Cornia, C. (1995). Developmental trends in implicit and explicit memory: A picture completion study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 566–578.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 501–518.
Schacter, D. L. (1992). Understanding implicit memory: A cognitive neuroscience approach. American Psychologist, 47, 559–569.
Schacter, D. L., & Cooper, L. A. (1995). Bias in the priming of object decisions: Logic, assumption, and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 768–776.
Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (1994a). Memory systems 1994. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (1994b). What are the memory systems of 1994? In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 1–38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schacter, D. L., Wagner, A. D., & Buckner, R. L. (2000). Memory systems of 1999. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 627–643). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1970). Independent functioning of verbal memory stores: A neuropsychological study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 261–273.
Shanks, D. R., & Johnstone, T. (1999). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1435–1451.
Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable learning systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
Sherry, D. F., & Schacter, D. L. (1987).The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review, 94, 439–454.
Shimamura, A. P. (1985). Problems with the finding of stochastic independence as evidence for multiple memory systems. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 506–508.
Simpson, G. G. (1961). Principles of animal taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sneath, P. H. A., & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Sokal, R. R., & Sneath, P. H. A. (1963). The principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991). The medial temporal lobe memory system. Science, 253, 1380–1386.
Stadler, M. A. (1997). Distinguishing implicit and explicit learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 56–62.
Stern, L. D. (1981). A review of theories of human amnesia. Memory & Cognition, 9, 247–262.
Stevens, P. F. (1980). Evolutionary polarity of character states. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 11, 333–358.
Toth, J. P., & Hunt, R. R. (1999). Not one versus many, but zero versus any: Structure and function in the context of the multiple-memory systems debate. In J. K. Foster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: Structure, function, or process? (pp. 232–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization and memory (pp. 382–403). New York: Academic Press.
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E. (1984). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385–398.
Tulving, E. (1985). On the classif ication problem in learning and memory. In L.-G. Nilsson & T. Archer (Eds.), Perspectives on learning and memory (pp. 67–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tulving, E. (1986). What kind of a hypothesis is the distinction between episodic and semantic memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 307–311.
Tulving, E. (1999). Study of memory: Processes and systems. In J. K. Foster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: Structure, function, or process? (pp. 11–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E. (2000). Concepts of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I.M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 33–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301–306.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 8, 336–342.
Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesia: Consolidation or retrieval? Nature, 228, 628–630.
Weldon, M. S. (1999). The memory chop shop: Issues in the search for memory systems. In J. K. Foster & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Memory: Structure, function, or process? (pp. 162–204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wickelgren, W. A. (1973). The long and short of memory. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 425–438.
Wiley, E. O., Siegel-Causey, D., Brooks, D. R., & Funk, V. A. (1991). The compleat cladist: A primer of phylogenetic procedures (Spec. Pub. No. 19). Lawrence: University of Kansas Museum of Natural History.
Willingham, D. B. (1997). Implicit and explicit memory do not differ in flexibility: Comment on Dienes and Berry (1997). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 587–591.
Willingham, D. B. (1998). What differentiates declarative and procedural memory: Reply to Cohen, Poldrack, and Eichenbaum (1997). Memory, 6, 689–699
Winocur, G. (1982). The amnesic syndrome: A deficit of cue utilization. In L. S. Cermak (Ed.), Human memory and amnesia (pp. 139–166). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by NIH Grant RO1 NS40106-01 and NSF Grant BRS9905342.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willingham, D.B., Goedert, K. The role of taxonomies in the study of human memory. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 1, 250–265 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.1.3.250
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.1.3.250