Abstract
The degree to which conditioned stimuli (CSs) control responding is often influenced when contextual cues are also associated with the unconditioned stimulus (US). In Experiment 1, selective ibotenate (IBO) lesions of the hippocampus impaired the ability of rats to inhibit responding to contextual cues made excitatory by presentation of unsignaled USs during simple Pavlovian CS—US training. Hippocampal damage had little effect on responding if few or no unsignaled USs had been delivered in the context. In Experiment 2, there was no evidence of increased responding to contextual cues when IBO lesions were given after excitatory training. However, lesioned rats showed greater resistance to CS extinction than did controls. An interpretation that encompasses these and other findings is that selective lesions of the hippocampus impair the formation of at least some types of inhibitory associations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bouton, M. E. (1994). Context, ambiguity and classical conditioning. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 3, 49–53.
Davidson, T. L., & Jarrard, L. E. (1989). Retention of concurrent conditional discriminations in rats with ibotenate lesions of hippocampus. Psychobiology, 17, 49–60.
Davidson, T. L., McKernan, M. G., & Jarrard, L. E. (1991). Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: A challenge to configural association theory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 227–234.
Dickinson, A., & Balleine, B. (1994). Motivational control of goal-directed action. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 1–18.
Dickinson, A., & Dawson, G. R. (1988). Motivational control of instrumental performance: The role of prior experience of the reinforcer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40B, 113–134.
Dickinson, A., & Dearing, M. F. (1979). Appetitive-aversive interactions and inhibitory processes. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.), Mechanisms of learning and motivation: A memorial volume to Jerzy Konorski (pp. 203–231). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. J. (1992). The hippocampus: What does it do? Behavioral & Neural Biology, 57, 2–36.
Gibbon, J., & Balsam, P. D. (1980). Spreading association in time. In C. M. Locurto, H. S. Terrace, & J. Gibbon (Eds.), Autoshaping and conditioning theory (pp. 219–253). New York: Academic Press.
Good, M., & Honey, R. C. (1991). Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 499–509.
Han, J.-S., Gallagher, M., & Holland, P. (1995). Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 7323–7329.
Honey, R. C., & Good, M. (1993). Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 107, 23–33.
Jarrard, L. E. (1973). The hippocampus and motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 1–12.
Jarrard, L. E. (1989). On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 29, 251–259.
Jarrard, L. E. (1993). On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 80, 9–26.
Jarrard, L. E., & Davidson, T. L. (1995). The hippocampus and non-spatial discrimination: Is learning still “not possible”? In N. E. Spear, L. S. Parker, & M. L. Woodruff (Eds.), Neurobehavioral plasticity (pp. 15–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kim, J. J., & Fanselow, M. S. (1992). Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. Science, 256, 675–677.
Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Morris, R. G. M., Schenk, F., Tweedie, F., & Jarrard, L. E. (1990). Ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and/or subiculum: Dissociating components of allocentric spatial learning. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2, 1016–1028.
Myers, C. E., & Gluck, M. A. (1994). Context, conditioning, and hippocampal representation in animal learning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 835–847.
O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552.
Philips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1992). Differential contributions of amygdala and hippocampus to cues and contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 274–285.
Rawlins, J. N. P. (1985). Associations across time: The hippocampus as a temporary memory store. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 8, 479–496.
Rescorla, R. A. (1968). Probability or shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 66, 1–5.
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variation in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.
Rudy, J. W., & Sutherland, R. J. (1994). The memory-coherence problem, configural associations, and the hippocampal system. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 119–146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Seldon, N. R. W., Everitt, B. J., Jarrard, L. E., & Robbins, T. W. (1991). Complementary roles for the amygdala and hippocampus in aversive conditioning to explicit and contextual cues. Neuroscience, 42, 335–350.
Solomon, P. R. (1977). Role of hippocampus in blocking and conditioned inhibition of rabbit’s nictitating membrane response. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 91, 407–417.
Williams, D. A., Overmier, J. B., & LoLordo, V. M. (1992). A reevaluation of Rescorla’s early dictums about Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 275–290.
Wilson, A., Brooks, D. C., & Bouton, M. E. (1995). The role of the rat hippocampal system in several effects of context in extinction. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 828–836.
Winocur, G., Rawlins, J. N. P., & Gray, J. A. (1987). The hippocampus and conditioning to contextual cues. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 617–625.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We thank Curtis Chong for assistance in the collection of data and Javier Morell for his helpful comments during discussions of this work. Support for this research was provided by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, and, in part, by a National Science Foundation Pre-Doctoral Fellowship. Portions of these results were presented at the 66th and 67th annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benoit, S.C., Davidson, T.L., Chan, KH. et al. Pavlovian conditioning and extinction of context cues and punctate CSs in rats with ibotenate lesions of the hippocampus. Psychobiology 27, 26–39 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332096
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332096