Abstract
The two studies reported involve the visual search of word lists for a target item when the rate of presentation is controlled and the words are presented tachistoscopically. In the first study, the target is differentiated physically from the filler items by being capitalized. When the target is the last item in a list, it is readily identified at all presentation rates, but when it is the first word or is embedded in a list, recognition accuracy is inversely related to presentation rate. In the second study, the differentiation between target and filler items is in terms of the presence or absence of category membership. All Ss at all presentation rates do significantly better on lists with an animal word as a target and a set of unrelated words as filler items than on the converse arrangement.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
LAWRENCE, D. H., & SASAKI, E. H. An n-channel stroboscopic tachistoscope for typewritten stimuli. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1970, 2, 63–65.
NEISSER, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
NEISSER, U., & BELLER, H. K. Searching through word lists. British Journal of Psychology, 1965, 56, 349–358.
NEISSER, U., NOVICK, R., & LAZAR, R. Searching for ten targets simultaneously. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1963, 17, 955–961.
POTTER, M. C., & LEVY, E. I. Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81, 10–15.
SPASAKI, E. H. The influence of number and type of targets upon rapid scanning of word lists. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Stanford University, 1970.
THORNDIKE, E. L., & LORGE, I.The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words; New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1944.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
These studies were supported by Research Grant HD-00897 from the National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lawrence, D.H. Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation*. Perception & Psychophysics 10, 85–89 (1971). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214320
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214320