Abstract
Apparent movement is used to examine the nature of the visual information which specifies object identity. Constructive feature-comparison theories rely on static formal information and predict that two phases of an apparent movement display must be featurally similar in order to appear as a single object in motion. An opposing Gibsonian model is based on abstract geometrical information and predicts that the two phases may differ radically in shape but must be ecologically transformable in order to be seen as a single object. The predictions are tested by presenting subjects with displays which are similar but not transformable, and transformable but dissimilar. Results show that the transformability of the display determines its perceived object identity, while featural similarity has no effect. An event theory of object identity is offered which claims that theaffordance structure of an event, determined by geometric invariants specifies object identity. ma-
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference notes
Shaw. R. E. & Pittenger. J.On perceiving change. Paper presented at the Conference on Modes of Perception, Spring Hill. Minnesota. June 1975.
Gibson. E. J.A classification or events for the study of event perception. Paper presented at the meeting of the -American Psychological Association. Chicago. September 1975.
References
Dodwell, P. C.Visual pattern recognition. New York: Holt Rinehart, & Winston, 1970,
Foster, D. H. A method for the investigation of those transformations under which the visual recognition of a given object is invariant. I. The theory.Kybernetik, 1972,11.217–222. (a)
Foster, D. H. A method for the investigation of those transformations under which the visual recognition of a given object is invariant. 11. An example experiment: The group of rotations SO(2) acting on a Landolt ring.Kybernetik, 1972.11. 223–229. (b)
Foster, D. H. A hypothesis connecting visual pattern recognition and apparent motion.Kybernetik, 1973,13, 151–154. (a)
Foster, D. H. An experimental examination of a hypothesis connecting visual pattern recognition and apparent motion.Kybernetik, 1973.14. 63–70. (b)
Gibson, J. J. Optical motions and transformations as stimuli for visual perception.Psychological Review. 1957,64. 288–295.
Gibson, J. J.The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1966. (a)
Gibson, J. J. The problem of temporal order in stimulation and perception.Journal of Psychology, 1966,62, 141–149. (b)
Jeger, M.Transformation geometry. (A. Deicke & A. Howson, Trans.). London: George Allen and Unwin, 1966.
Kolers, P. A.Aspects of motion perception. Oxford: Permagon, 1972.
Kolers, P. A.. &Pomerantz, J. R. Figural change in apparent motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971.87. 99–108.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. 1967.
Orlansky. J. The effect of similarity and difference in form on apparent visual movement.Archives of Psychology, 1940.35 (Whole No. 246).
Pittenger, J., &Shaw, R. E. Aging faces as viscal-elastic events: Implications for a theory of nonrigid shape perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 374–382.
Rosch, E..Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M.. &Boyes-Braem, P. Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology. 1976.8. 382–439.
Selfridge, O. G. Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In D. U. Blake & A. M. Uttely (Eds.),Proceedings of the symposium on the mechanization of thought processes. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. 1959,
Shaw, R. E., McIntyre, M.. &Mace, W. The role of symmetry in event perception. In H. Pick (Ed.),Perception: Essays in honor of J. J. Gibson. Ithaca: Cornell Press, 1974.
Shaw, R.E., & Wilson. B. E. Generative conceptual knowledge: How we know what we know. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Carnegie-Mellon symposium on information processing: Cognition and instruction. Vail. Colorado. June 1974. Hillsdale. N.J: Erlbaum. in press.
Squires, P. C. Topological aspects of apparent visual motion.Psychologie Forschung, 1959.26. 1–12.
Stroud, J. M. The fine structure of psychological time. In H. Quastler (Ed.).Information theory in psychology. Glencoe: Free Press, 1955.
Uhr, L. “Pattern recognition” computers as models for form perception.Psychological Bulletin, 1963,60, 40–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper was prepared as part of an undergraduate thesis in the School of Language and Communications, Hampshire College, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002, from which reprints may be obtained.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warren, W.H. Visual information for object identity in apparent movement. Perception & Psychophysics 21, 264–268 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214238
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214238