Abstract
By investigating the visual processing involved when saccades are made to newly appearing targets, we show that this processing is significantly nonlinear and that texture boundary information predominates. We used the global, or center-of-gravity, effect whereby a saccadic eye movement directed to a target consisting of a pair of elements has an amplitude intermediate between that of saccades directed to the individual elements. We measured the effect using target elements with different visual characteristics, including phase-reversal checkerboard targets that had the same space-average luminance as the background. The contribution to the center-of-gravity calculation was used to measure relative salience. We found that positive and negative contrast elements contribute almost equal weightings. Thus, salience, assessed in this way, is a highly nonlinear function of luminance. The salience of checkerboard targets was found to decrease as check size was decreased and increase as the overall size of the target was increased. Checkerboards with an empty center were as effective as were full checkerboards, showing the importance of boundaries in the salience signal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allman, J., Miezin, F., &McGuinness, E. (1985). Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in human vision.Annual Review of Neuroscience,8, 407–439.
Becker, W. (1989). Metrics. In R. H. Wurtz & M. E. Goldberg (Eds.),The neurobiology of scaccadic eye movements (pp. 13–67). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Braddick, O. J., Campbell, F. W., &Atktnson, J., (1978). Channels in vision: Basic aspects. In R. Held, H. Leibowitz, & H.-L. Teuber (Eds.),Handbook of sensory physiology: Perception (Vol. 8, pp. 3–38). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Carlson, C. R., Moeller, J. R., &Anderson, C. H. (1984). Visual illusions without low spatial frequencies.Vision Research,24, 1407–1413.
Collewijn, H., Van Der Mark, F., &Jansen, T. C. (1975). Precise recordings of human eye movements.Vision Research,15, 447–450.
Coren, S., &Hoenig, P. (1972). Effect of non-target stimuli on the length of voluntary saccades.Perceptual & Motor Skills,34, 499–508.
Deubel, H., Findlay, J., Jacobs, A., &Brogan, D. (1988). Saccadic eye movements to targets defined by structure differences. In G. Lüer, U. Lass, & J. Shallo-Hoffman (Eds.),Eye movement research: Physiological and psychological aspects (pp. 107–145). Toronto: Hogrefe.
Deubel, H., &Hauske, G. (1988). The programming of visually guided saccades. In H. Marko, G. Hauske, & A. Struppler (Eds.),Processing structures for perception and action (pp. 67–74). Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.
Deubel, H., Wolf, W., &Hauske, G. (1984). The evaluation of the oculomotor error signal. In A. G. Gale & F.W. Johnson (Eds.),Theoretical & applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 55–62). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
De Valois, R. L., &De Valois, K. K. (1980). Spatial vision.Annual Review of Psychology,31, 309–341.
Felleman, D. J., &Van Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.Cerebral Cortex,1, 1–47.
Findlay, J. M. (1981). Local and global influences on saccadic eye movements. In D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. W. Senders (Eds.),Eye movements, cognition and visual perception (pp. 171–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,
Findlay, J. M. (1982). Global processing for saccadic eye movements.Vision Research,22, 1033–1045.
Findlay, J. M. (1985). Eye movements and visual cognition.L’Année psychologique,85, 101–136.
Findlay, J. M. (1992). Programming of stimulus elicited saccadic eye movements. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition (pp. 8–30). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Findlay, J. M., &Harris, L. R. (1984). Small saccades to double stepped targets in two dimensions. In A. G. Gale & F. W. Johnson (Eds.),Theoreticaland applied aspects of oculomotor research (pp. 71–77). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fiorentini, A., Baumgartner, G., Magnussen, S., Schiller, P. H., &Thomas, J. P. (1990). The perception of brightness and darkness: Relations to neuronal receptive fields. In L. Spillman & J. S. Werner (eds.),Visual Perception: The neurophysiological foundations (pp. 129–161). San Diego: Academic Press.
Goodale, M. A., &Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neuroscience,15, 20–25.
He, P., &Kowler, E. (1989). The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: Implications for “center-of-gravity” tendencies.Vision Research,29, 1165–1181.
Julesz, B., &Bergen, J. R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception oftextures.Bell System Technical Journal,62, 1619–1645.
Kapoula, Z. (1985). Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system.Vision Research,25, 1155–1157.
Marr, D. (1982).Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Menz, C., &Groner, R. (1987). Saccadic programming with multiple targets under different task conditions. In J. K. O’Regan & A Lévy-Schoen (Eds.),Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 95–103). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Morrone, M. C., &Burr, D. C. (1988). Feature detection inhuman vision: A phase-dependent energy model.Proceedings of the Royal Society,235B, 221–245
Rovamo, J., Vitsu, V., &Näsänen, R. (1978). Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision.Nature,271, 54–55.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985). “Where” and “What” in vision.Science,228, 1217–1219.
Shapley, R., &Gordon, J. (1985). Nonlinearity in the perception of form.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 84–88.
Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision.Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing,31, 156–177.
Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Watt, R. J. (1988).Visualprocessing: Computational, psychophysical and cognitive research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zetzsche, C., Deubel, H., &Elsner, T. (1984). Similar mechanisms of visual processing in perception and oculomotor control.Perception,13 A16. (Abstract, Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Visual Perception, Cambridge, 1984)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by SERC Grant GR/E/88165. A preliminary report of Experiment I appeared in the Proceedings of the Fourth European Eye Movement Conference (Deubel, Findlay, Jacobs, & Brogan, 1988).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Findlay, J.M., Brogan, D. & Wenban-Smith, M.G. The spatial signal for saccadic eye movements emphasizes visual boundaries. Perception & Psychophysics 53, 633–641 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211739
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211739