Abstract
Piéron (1914, 1920, 1952) demonstrated that simple reaction time decays as a hyperbolic function of luminance. Similarities between cell latencies and reaction time (RT) to luminance suggest that this relationship may be determined by retinal processes. If the exponent of the Piéron function is specific to a given sensory modality, as assumed by some authors (e.g., Bonnet, 1992a, 1992b; Norwich, 1987), it should reflect receptor activities. Consequently, functions with different exponents should fit data for different luminance ranges. In a contrast-discrimination experiment, we investigated this question with a large range of luminance levels in a two-alternative spatial forced-choice task. The results of the experiment show that three functions with different exponents fit RT to the three luminance ranges (scotopic, mesopic, and photopic). The exponent decreases with increasing luminance. The findings indicate that the exponent and the asymptotic latency of the RT function reflect receptor activities of the visual system.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baird, J. C. (1970). A cognitive theory of psychophysics: I. Information transmission, partitioning and Weber’s law.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,11, 35–46.
Baird, J. C., &Noma, E. (1978).Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Benimoff, N. I., Schneider, S., &Hood, D. C. (1982). Interactions between rod and cone channels above threshold: A test of various models.Vision Research,22, 1133–1140.
Bernhard, C. G. (1940). Contributions to the neurophysiology of the optical pathway.Acta Physiologica Scandinavica,1 (Suppl. 1), 52–94.
Bonnet, C. (1992a). Psychophysical scaling within an information processing approach?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,15, 560–561.
Bonnet, C. (1992b). Sensation and psychophysics of reaction time.International Journal of Psychology,27, 373.
Bonnet, C. (1997).Sensory functions estimated from reaction time measurements. Manuscript in preparation.
Bujas, Z., Szabo, S., Mayer, D., Ajdukovic, D., &Vodanovic, M. (1989). Reaction time as a tentative measure of taste intensity and of taste mixture effects.Acta Biologica,14, 17–37.
Buser, P., &Imbert, M. (1987).Vision. Paris: Hermann.
Cattell, J. M. (1886). The influence of the intensity of the stimulus on the length of the reaction time.Brain,8, 512–515.
Chocholle, R. (1940). Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l’intensité à diverses fréquences [Variation in auditory reaction times as a function of diverse frequency intensities].L’Année Psychologique,41/42, 65–124.
Davson, H. (1962).The eye: II. The visual process. New York: Academic Press.
Djupsund, K., Fyhrquist, N., Hariyama, T., &Donner, K. (1996). The effect of background luminance on visual responses to strong flashes: Perceived brightness and the early rise of photoreceptor responses.Vision Research,36, 3253–3264.
Doma, H., &Hallett, P. E. (1988). Rod-cone dependence of saccadic eye-movement latency in a foveating task.Vision Research,28, 899–913.
Doma, H., &Hallett, P. E. (1989). Variable contributions of rods and cones to saccadic eye-movement latency in a non-foveating task.Vision Research,29, 563–577.
Donner, K. (1989). Visual latency and brightness: An interpretation based on the responses of rods and ganglion cells in the frog retina.Visual Neuroscience,3, 39–51.
Exner, S. (1868). Über die zu einer Gesichtswahrnehmung nötige Zeit [The necessary time for a visual perception].Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften,57, 601–632.
Graham, W. R. (1965).Vision and visual perception. New York: Wiley.
Haig, C. (1941). The course of rod dark adaptation as influenced by the intensity and duration of preadaptation to light.Journal of General Physiology,24, 735–751.
Hecht, S. (1934). Vision: II. The nature of the photoreceptor process. In C. Murchison (Ed.),Handbook of general experimental psychology (pp. 704–828). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Hecht, S., Peskin, J. C., &Patt, M. (1938). Intensity discrimination in the human eye: II. Relationship between ? I/I and intensity for different parts of the spectrum.Journal of General Physiology,22, 7–19.
Hecht, S., &Shlaer, S. (1938). An adaptometer for measuring human dark adaptation.Journal of the Optical Society of America,28, 269–275.
Hood, D. C., &Finkelstein, M. A. (1986). Sensibility to light. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 5XXX1 to 5XXX66). New York: Wiley.
Ikeda, M., &Urakubo, M. (1969). Rod-cone interrelation.Journal of the Optical Society of America,59, 217–222.
Lappin, J. S., &Dish, K. (1972). The latency operating characteristic: II. Effects of visual stimulus intensity on choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 367–372.
Link, S. W. (1992).The wave theory of discrimination and similarity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mansfield, R. J. W. (1973). Latency functions in human vision.Vision Research,13, 2219–2234.
Monnier, M. (1949). Retinal time, retinocortical time, alpha blocking time, and motor reaction time.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,1, 516–517.
Norwich, K. H. (1987). On the theory of Weber fractions.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 286–298.
Norwich, K. H., Seburn, C. N. L., &Axelrad, E. (1989). An information approach to reaction times.Bulletin of Mathematical Biology,51, 347–358.
Pachella, R. G., &Fisher, D. F. (1969). Effect of stimulus degradation and similarity on the trade-off between speed and accuracy in absolute judgements.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 7–9.
Piéron, H. (1914). Recherches sur les lois de variation des temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensités excitatrices [Research on the laws of variation of sensory latencies as a function of stimulus intensities].L’Année Psychologique,20, 17–96.
Piéron, H. (1920). Nouvelles recherches sur l’analyse du temps de latence sensorielle et sur la loi qui relie ce temps à l’intensité de l’excitation [New research on the analysis of sensory latencies and on the law relating this time to the intensity of the stimulus].L’Année Psychologique,22, 58–142.
Piéron, H. (1952).The sensations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Pins, D. P., &Bonnet, C. (1996). On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron’s law and choice reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 390–400.
Posner, M. I. (1986).Chronometric exploration of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Teghtsoonian, H. (1971). On the exponents in Stevens’ law and the constants in Eckman’s law.Psychological Review,78, 71–80.
Ueno, T. (1977). Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels.Vision Research,17, 227–232.
Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1966). The perceptual and physiologic significance of visual evoked responses recorded from the scalp in man. In H. M. Burian & J. H. Jacobson (Eds.),Clinical electroretinography (pp. 203–223). New York: Pergamon.
Vaughan, H. G., Jr.,Costa, L. D., &Gilden, L. (1966). The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity.Vision Research,6, 645–656.
Vaughan, H. G., Jr., &Hull, R. C. (1965). Functional relation between stimulus intensity and photically evoked cerebral responses in man.Nature,206, 720–722.
Ward, L. M., &Davidson, K. P. (1997).Exponent convergence in Norwich’s conservation law for psychophysics: Simple reaction time, Weber fractions and loudness. Manuscript in preparation.
Wundt, W. (1886).Eléments de psychologie physiologique [Elements of physiological psychology; translation ofGrundzüge der physiologisches Psychologie, 1874]. Paris: Felix Alcan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Thanks are due to J. C. Baird, L. M. Ward, and J. E. Cutting for their insightful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pins, D., Bonnet, C. Reaction times reveal the contribution of the different receptor components in luminance perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, 359–366 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210793
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210793