Abstract
Two new procedures were employed to investigate the effects of semantic and grammatical gender on lexical access in Italian and to investigate the interaction of gender with other factors that are known to influence lexical access in other languages. The gender-monitoring task requires a conscious decision about the gender of each noun, whereas the word repetition task does not require explicit attention to gender. In both tasks, single words are presented out of context, under speeded conditions. Both procedures proved to be sensitive indices of word recognition, with reaction times that are closely tied to the point at which words can be uniquely identified (although some processing before and after the uniqueness point was seen). In both tasks, reaction times were strongly affected by phonological factors (e.g., length, number of syllables, and presence of frication on the initial consonant). Phonological transparency of gender marking had a reliable effect on gender monitoring but had no effect on word repetition, suggesting that explicit attention to gender may be a factor affecting utilization of this phonological cue. Semantic factors (including semantic gender) had no effect on performance. Frequency and age of acquisition had very small effects when other factors were controlled. Implications for current models of lexical access are discussed, with special reference to the role of gender.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balota, D. A. (1992). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303–358). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bates, E., &Devescovi, A. (1989). A cross-linguistic approach to sentence production. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.),The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 225–253). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., &Pizzamiglio, L. (1994).Gender priming in Italian. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, San Diego.
Bates, E., &MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.),The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3–73). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brooks, J., Braine, M. D. S., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E., &Sudhalter, V. (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 76–95.
Brown, P., Senft, G., &Wheeldon, L. (Eds.) (1993).Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics: Annual Report 1992. Nijmegen: Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Burani, C. (1992). Patterns of inflectional errors with reference to the Italian adjectival system.Rivista di Linguistica,4, 255–272.
Caselli, M. C., &Casadio, P. (1992).Fondazione MacArthur: Lo sviluppo comunicativo nella prima infanzia [MacArthur Foundation: Communicative development in early infancy]. Rome: Istituto di Psicologia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.
Caselli, M. C., Leonard, L., Volterra, V., &Campagnoli, M. (1993). Toward mastery of Italian morphology: A cross-sectional study.Journal of Child Language,20, 377–393.
Caselli, M. C., Rampelli, L., Volterra, V., &Maragna, S. (1994).Linguaggio e sordità [Language and deafness]. Florence: La Nuova Italia.
Cassidy, K., &Kelly, M. (1991). Phonological information for grammatical category assignment.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 348–369.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Colé, P., &Ségui, J. (1994). Grammatical incongruency and vocabulary types.Memory & Cognition,22, 387–394.
Connine, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., &Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1084–1096.
Dell, G., &O’Sheaghda, P. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production.Cognition,42, 287–314.
De Mauro, T., Mancini, F., Vedovelli, M., &Voghera, M. (1993).Lessico di frequenza dell’ italiano parlato [Frequency dictionary of spoken Italian]. Rome: Fondazione IBM Italia.
De Ruiter, J. P. (1992).Predicting and measuring the moment of auditory word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Department of Cognitive Science.
Deutsch, W., &Wijnen, F. (1985). The article’s noun and the noun’s article: Explorations into the representation and access of linguistic gender in Dutch.Linguistics,23, 793–810.
Devescovi, A., D’Amico, S., Smith, S., Mimica, I., & Bates, E. (1993).The development of sentence comprehension in Italian and Serbo-Croatian: Local versus distributed cues. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Department of Psychology.
Fodor, J. (1959). The origin of grammatical gender.Lingua,8, 1–41.
Frauenfelder, U., &Tyler, L. (Eds.) (1987).Spoken word recognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Friederici, F., &Schriefers, H. (1993).Semantic and morphosyntactic context effects on word recognition: The influence of peripheral and central processing variables. Unpublished manuscript, Cognitive Science Lab, Institut für Psychologie, Berlin.
Goodman, J., &Huttenlocher, J. (1988). Do we know how people identify spoken words?Journal of Memory & Language,27, 684–698.
Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken-word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 267–283.
Grosjean, F., Dommergues, J.-Y., Cornu, E., Guillelmon, D., &Besson, C. (1994). The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 590–598.
Herron, D. (1994).Grammatical and acoustic contributions to the processing of open- and closed-class words. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of California, San Diego, Department of Cognitive Science. International dictionary: English/Spanish, Spanish/English. (1973). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Jarema, G., &Friederici, A. D. (1994). Processing articles and pronouns in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from French.Brain & Language,46, 683–694.
Kail, M. (1989). Cue validity, cue cost, and processing types in sentence comprehension in French and Spanish. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.),The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 77–117). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kilborn, K. (1987).Sentence processing in a second language: Seeking a performance definition of fluency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, Department of Psychology.
Leonard, L., Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. C., McGregor, K., &Sabbadini, L. (1992). Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar.Language Acquisition,2, 151–179.
Leonard, L. B., Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. C., &Sabbadini, L. (1993). The use of articles by Italian-speaking children with specific language impairment.Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,7, 19–27.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989).Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Liu, H., &Bates, E. (1993).Single-word shadowing and the study of lexical access (Tech. Rep. No. 9306). La Jolla: University of California, San Diego, Center for Research in Language.
Luce, P., Pisoni, D., &Goldinger, S. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 122–147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,43 (2, Serial No. 174).
MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., &McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 255–277.
Maratsos, M. (1981). Problems in categorial evolution: Can formal categories arise from semantic ones? In W. Deutsch (Ed.),The child’s construction of language. London/New York: Academic Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.),Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 148–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mills, A. (1986).The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Morrison, C., Ellis, A., &Quinlan, P. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 705–714.
Mulford, R. (1983). Comprehension of Icelandic pronouns: Semantic vs. formal factors.Journal of Child Language,12, 443–453.
Orsolini, M. (1993, July).Children’s semantic processing of gender cues. Paper presented at the Sixth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Trieste, Italy.
Palazzi, F. (1973).Novissimo dizionario della lingua italiana [New dictionary of the Italian language]. Milan: Ceschino.
Radeau, M., &Morais, J. (1990). The uniqueness point effect in the shadowing of spoken words.Speech Communication,9, 155–164.
Radeau, M., Mousty, P., &Bertelson, P. (1989). The effect of the uniqueness point in spoken-word recognition.Psychological Research,51, 123–128.
Slowiaczek, L. M. (1994). Semantic priming in a single-word shadowing task.American Journal of Psychology,107, 245–260.
Taft, M., &Hambly, G. (1986). Exploring the Cohort Model of spoken word recognition.Cognition,22, 259–282.
Whalen, D. (1991). Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 351–360.
Zubin, D., &Köpcke, K. (1981). Gender: A less than arbitrary grammatical category. In C. M. R. Hendrick & M. Miller (Eds.),Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIDCD Grant PHS DC00216-09 to E.B., and by a grant from the Clinica e Centro di Ricerca Santa Lucia to L.P. During manuscript preparation, E.B. was a visiting scholar at the Istituto di Psicologia, Consiglio Nazionale di Ricerca, in laboratories directed by Virginia Volterra at the Istituto Statale Sordo-Muti, Via Nomentana 56, Rome, Italy.
Any errors of design or interpretation that remain are, of course, our own.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L. et al. Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 847–862 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206800
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206800