Skip to main content
Log in

An on-line task for contrasting auditory processing in the verbal and nonverbal domains and norms for younger and older adults

  • Published:
Behavior Research Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrasting linguistic and nonlinguistic processing has been of interest to many researchers with different scientific, theoretical, or clinical questions. However, previous work on this type of comparative analysis and experimentation has been limited. In particular, little is known about the differences and similarities between the perceptual, cognitive, and neural processing of nonverbal environmental sounds and that of speech sounds. With the aim of contrasting verbal and nonverbal processing in the auditory modality, we developed a new on-line measure that can be administered to subjects from different clinical, neurological, or sociocultural groups. This is an on-line task of sound to picture matching, in which the sounds are either environmental sounds or their linguistic equivalents and which is controlled for potential task and item confounds across the two sound types. Here, we describe the design and development of our measure and report norming data for healthy subjects from two different adult age groups: younger adults (18–24 years of age) and older adults (54–78 years of age). We also outline other populations to which the test has been or is being administered. In addition to the results reported here, the test can be useful to other researchers who are interested in systematically contrasting verbal and nonverbal auditory processing in other populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. B., &Janata, P. (2002). A comparison of neural circuits underlying auditory and visual object categorization.NeuroImage,16, 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballas, J. A. (1993). Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 250–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballas, J. A., &Howard, J. H. (1987). Interpreting the language of environmental sounds.Environment & Behavior,19, 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, J. C. (1977). Remembering environmental sounds: The role of verbalization at input.Memory & Cognition,5, 404–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., D’Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., Herron, D., Lu, C. C., Pechmann, T., Pléh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Gutierrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K., Mehotcheva, T., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Tzeng, A., &Tzeng, O. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 344–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J. R. (1997). Functional magnetic resonance imaging: Language mapping.Neurosurgery Clinics of North America,8, 383–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S., Springer, J. A., Kaufman, J. N., &Possing, E. T. (2000). Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds.Cerebral Cortex,10, 512–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C. Y., &Schacter, D. L. (1995). Auditory priming for nonverbal information: Implicit and explicit memory for environmental sounds.Consciousness & Cognition,4, 440–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., Bellmann, A., De Ribaupierre, F., &Assal, G. (1996). Nonverbal auditory recognition in normal subjects and brain-damaged patients: Evidence for parallel processing.Neuropsychologia,34, 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., Bellmann, A., Meuli, R. A., Assal, G., &Steck, A. J. (2000). Auditory agnosia and auditory spatial deficits following left hemispheric lesions: Evidence for distinct processing pathways.Neuropsychologia,38, 797–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, A., Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., & Bates, E. (2004, May).Is there a dissociation between verbal and environmental sound processing in young children? Paper presented at the14th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies, Chicago.

  • Cycowicz, Y. M., &Friedman, D. (1998). Effect of sound familiarity on the event-related potentials elicited by novel environmental sounds.Brain & Cognition,36, 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, F., Bussiere, J., &Saygin, A. P. (2002). The effects of linguistic mediation on the identification of environmental sounds.Center for Research in Language Newsletter,14, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, F., Saygin, A. P., Paulsen, C., Trauner, D., & Bates, E. (2004, July).The co-development of environmental sound and language comprehension in school-age children. Paper presented at Attention and Performance XXI: Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development. Iron Horse, CO.

  • Dick, F., Saygin, A. P., Pitzalis, S. M., Galati, G., Bentrovato, S., D’Amico, S., Pizzamiglio, L. & Bates, E. (2004).What is involved and what is necessary for complex linguistic and non-linguistic auditory processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Faglioni, P., Spinnler, H., &Vignolo, L. A. (1969). Contrasting behavior of right and left hemisphere-damaged patients on a discriminative and a semantic task of auditory recognition.Cortex,5, 366–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gygi, B. (2001).Factors in the identification of environmental sounds. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, C., Buchsbaum, B., &Hickok, G. (2001). Perception of speech, music, and sounds: An fMRI study [CD-ROM].Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,27, 949.9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazui, S., Naritomi, H., Sawada, T., Inoue, N., &Okuda, J. (1990). Subcortical auditory agnosia.Brain & Language,38, 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkman, M., Granstrom, M. L., Appelqvist, K., &Liukkonen, E. (1998). Neuropsychological characteristics of five children with the Landau-Kleffner syndrome: Dissociation of auditory and phonological discrimination.Journal of International Neuropsychological Society,4, 566–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P.W., &Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis.Discourse Processes,25, 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. W., Wightman, F. L., Brefczynski, J. A., Phinney, R. E., Binder, J. R., &DeYoe, E. A. (2004). Human brain regions involved in recognizing environmental sounds.Cerebral Cortex,14, 1008–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeder, P. P., Meuli, R. A., Adriani, M., Bellmann, A., Fornari, E., Thiran, J. P., Pittet, A., &Clarke, S. (2001). Distinct pathways involved in sound recognition and localization: A human fMRI study.NeuroImage,14, 802–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcell, M. M., Borrela, D., Greene, M., Kerr, E., &Rogers, S. (2000). Confrontation naming of environmental sounds.Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology,22, 830–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcell, M. M., Busby, E. A., Mansker, J. K., &Whelan, M. L. (1998). Confrontation naming of familiar sounds and pictures by individuals with Down syndrome.American Journal of Mental Retardation,102, 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia,9, 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saygin, A. P. (2001).Contrasting verbal and nonverbal auditory processing in aphasia. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Wilson, S. M., Dronkers, N., &Bates, E. (2003). Neural resources for processing language and environmental sounds: Evidence from aphasia.Brain,126, 928–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saygin, A. P., &Moineau, S. (2002). Auditory agnosia with preserved verbal comprehension after unilateral left hemisphere lesion involving Wernicke’s area [CD-ROM].Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,28, 673.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnider, A., Benson, D. F., Alexander, D. N., &Schnider-Klaus, A. (1994). Non-verbal environmental sound recognition after unilateral hemispheric stroke.Brain,117, 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinnler, H., &Vignolo, L. A. (1966). Impaired recognition of meaningful sounds in aphasia.Cortex,2, 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, G. P., &Jones, D. M. (1995). Priming the identification of environmental sounds.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 741–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Székely, A., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Federmeier, K., Herron, D., Iyer, G., Jacobsen, T., &Bates, E. (2003). Timed picture naming: Extended norms and validation against previous studies.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35, 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Lancker, D., Cornelius, C., Kreiman, J., Tonick, I., Tanguay, P., &Schulman, M. L. (1988). Recognition of environmental sounds in autistic children.Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,27, 423–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Petten, C., &Rheinfelder, H. (1995). Conceptual relationships between spoken words and environmental sounds: Event-related brain potential measures.Neuropsychologia,33, 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varney, N. R. (1980). Sound recognition in relation to aural language comprehension in aphasic patients.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry,43, 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vignolo, L. A. (1982). Auditory agnosia.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B. Biological Sciences,298, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, R., Chollet, F., Hadar, U., Friston, K., Hoffner, E., &Frackowiak, R. (1991). Distribution of cortical neural networks involved in word comprehension and word retrieval.Brain,114, 1803–1817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayşe Pinar Saygin.

Additional information

This research was supported by Cross-Linguistic Studies in Aphasia Grant NIH/NIDCD RO1-DC00216 to E.B. and by Language, Communication and the Brain CRL Training Grant NIH T 32 DC00041, and Training Program in Cognitive Neuroscience Grant NIH/NIMH 1 T32 MH20002-02 to F.D.

Note—This article was accepted by the previous editor, Jonathan Vaughan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saygin, A.P., Dick, F. & Bates, E. An on-line task for contrasting auditory processing in the verbal and nonverbal domains and norms for younger and older adults. Behavior Research Methods 37, 99–110 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206403

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206403

Keywords

Navigation