Abstract
This paper presents a functional measurement analysis of Parducci’s range-frequency theory. The theory provides a basis for (1)finding context-invariant psychophysical scales, (2)establishing the validity of rating scales, and (3) explaining contextual effects in judgment. In an experimental illustration, Ss judged the magnitude of numerals in nine different distributions. All data were used to obtain the psychophysical function for numerals and also to test the model. The large contextual effects were consistent with the model. Quantitative tests of fit supported the equal-interval assumption of the category scale. The psychophysical function appeared nearly linear but with a significant negative acceleration. The data were shown to be qualitatively inconsistent with generalizations of Helson’s theory of adaptation level and Johnson’s correlation-regression theory. They supported Parducci’s range-frequency theory and illustrated how it could be used to factor out contextual effects from effects of stimulus magnitude. Extensions of the range-frequency approach are also discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. H. Functional measurement and psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 153–170.
Birnbaum, M. H. The nonadditivity of impressions. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1972.
Birnbaum, M. H., & Veit, C. T. Scale convergence as a criterion for rescaling: Information integration with difference, ratio, and averaging tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 1974, 15, 7–15.
Bogartz, R. S., & Wackwitz, J. H. Polynomial response scaling and functional measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1971, 8, 418–443.
Galanter, E. Contemporary psychophysics. In R. Brown et al (Eds.),New directions in psychology I. New York: Holt. Rinehart, & Winston, 1962.
Garner, W. R. Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 48, 218–224.
Harvey, O. J., & Campbell, D. T. Judgment of weight as affected by adaptation range, adaptation duration, magnitude of unlabeled anchor, and judgment language. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 65, 12–21.
Helson, H.Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
Helson, H., & Kosaki, A. Anchor effects using numerical estimates of simple dot patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 4, 163–164.
Johnson, D. M., & Mullally, C. R. Correlation-and-regression model for category judgments. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 205–215.
Luce, R. D., & Galanter, E. Psychophysical scaling. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley, 1963.
Parducci, A. Range-frequency compromise in judgment. Psychological Monographs, 1963, 77(2, Whole No. 565).
Parducci, A. Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 1965, 72, 407–418.
Parducci, A. Contextual effects: A range-frequency analysis. In E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, 1973, in press.
Parducci, A., Calfee, R. C., Marshall, L. M., & Davidson, L. P. Context effects in judgment: Adaptation-level as function of mean, midpoint, and median of the stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960, 60, 65–77.
Parducci, A., & Perrett, L. F. Category rating scales: Effects of spacing and frequency of stimulus values. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1971, 89, 427–452.
Poulton, E. C. The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 1–19.
Rule, S. J., & Curtis, D. W. Conjoint scaling of subjective number and weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 97, 305–309.
Stevens, S. S. Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review, 1971, 78, 426–450.
Stevens, S. S., & Galanter, E. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957, 54, 377–411.
Treisman, M. Sensory scaling and the psychophysical law. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964, 16, 11–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author would like to thank Allen Parducci, whose research inspired the present work and who provided valuable guidance on this project. Thanks are also due to Norman H. Anderson and Clairice T. Veit for their helpful suggestions on earlier drafts. This research was completed while the author held a National Defense Education Act Title IV graduate fellowship at the University of California, Los Angeles, where computing support was provided by Carnpus Computing Network. This paper was completed while the author held a National Institute of Mental Health postdoctoral fellowship at the Center for Human Information Processing, University, of California, San Diego, which provided assistance in the preparation of the manuscript through NIMH Grant MH-15828.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birnbaum, M.H. Using contextual effects to derive psychophysical scales. Perception & Psychophysics 15, 89–96 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205834
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205834