Abstract
The present note demonstrates that Baron’s (1971) second-guess data are not inconsistent with the basic assumptions of Kristofferson’s attention-switching model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, L. G., &Kristofferson, A. B. Successiveness discrimination: Two models.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 37–46.
Allport, D. A. Phenomenal simultaneity and the perceptual moment hypothesis.British Journal of Psychology, 1968,59, 395–406.
Baron, J. The threshold for successiveness.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 201–207.
Kristofferson, A. B. Attention and psychophysical time.Acta Psychologica, 1967,27, 92–100. (a)
Kristofferson, A. B. Successiveness discrimination as a two state quantal process.Science, 1967,158, 1337–1339. (b)
Kristofferson, A. B. Attention. In R. M. Patton, T. A. Tanner, J. Markowitz, and J. A. Swets (Eds.),Applications of research on human decision making. Washington, D.C: NASA, 1970. pp. 49–64.
Stroud, J. M. The fine structure of psychological time. In H. Quastler (Ed.).Information theory tn psychology. New York: Free Press, 1955.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The preparation of the paper was supported by Grant A8260 from the National Research Council of Canada. A more detailed version is available as McMaster Technical Report No. 57, 1974.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allan, L.G. Second guesses and the attention-switching model for successiveness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 17, 65–68 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203999
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203999