Abstract
Pigeons were trained on two visual discrimination tasks. One task was discrimination between real objects and their photographs. Training stimuli consisted of real food (grains), photographs of food, and nonedible junk objects and their photographs. The other task was discrimination between food and nonfood using the same stimuli as those in the first task. The pigeons learned either task and showed generalization of these classifications to novel stimuli. These results suggest that pigeons can either discriminate or integrate real stimuli and their photographs. Bilateral ectostriatal lesions caused deficits in food versus nonfood discrimination, but not in object versus picture discrimination. This dissociation suggests different brain mechanisms between the two visual discriminations using the same stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bessette, B. B., &Hodos, W. (1989). Intensity, color, and pattern discrimination deficits after lesions of the core and belt regions of the ectostriatum.Visual Neuroscience,2, 27–34.
Bischof, H.-J. (1988). The visual field and visually guided behavior in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata).Journal of Comparative Physiology A,163, 329–337.
Cabe, P. A. (1976). Transfer of discrimination from solid objects to pictures by pigeons: A test of theoretical models of pictorial perception.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 545–550.
Davenport, R. K., &Rogers, C. M. (1970). Perception of photographs by apes.Behaviour,31, 319–320.
Hodos, W., &Karten, H. J. (1970). Visual intensity and pattern discrimination deficits after lesions of ectostriatum in pigeons.Journal of Comparative Neurology,140, 53–68.
Hodos, W., Karten, H. J., &Bonbright, J. C. (1973). Visual intensity and pattern discrimination after lesions of the thalamofugal visual pathway in pigeons.Journal of Comparative Neurology,148, 447–468.
Hodos, W., Weiss, S. R. B., &Bessette, B. B. (1986). Size-threshold changes after lesions of the visual telencephalon in pigeons.Behavioural Brain Research,21, 203–214.
Karten, H., &Hodos, W. (1967).A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the pigeon (Columba livia). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Karten, H., &Shimizu, T. (1989). The origins of neocortex: Connections and lamination as distinct events in evolution.Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 291–301.
Lea, S. E. G., &Harrison, S. N. (1978). Discrimination of polymorphous stimulus sets by pigeons.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 521–537.
McFadden, S. A. (1993). Constructing the three-dimensional image. In H. P. Zeigler & H.-J. Bischof (Eds.),Vision, brain & behavior in birds (pp. 47–61). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McFadden, S. A., &Wild, J. M. (1986). Binocular depth perception in the pigeon (Columba livia).Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior,45, 149–160.
Nalbach, H. O., Wolf-Oberhollenzer, F., &Kirschfeld, K. (1990). The pigeon’s eye viewed through an ophthalmoscopic microscope: Orientation of retinal landmarks and significance of eye movement.Vision Research,30, 529–540.
Perisic, M., Mihailovic, J., &Cuenod, M. (1971). Electrophysiology of contralateral and ipsilateral visual projection to the Wulst in the pigeon (Columba livia).International Journal of Neuroscience,2, 7–14.
Powers, A. S., Halasz, F., &Williams, S. (1982). The effects of lesions in telencephalic visual areas of pigeons on dimensional shifting.Physiology & Behavior,29, 1099–1104.
Reiley, N. M., Hodos, W., &Pasternak, T. (1988). Effects of serial lesions of telencephalic components of the visual system in pigeons.Visual Neuroscience,1, 387–394.
Reilly, S. (1987). Hyperstriatal lesions and attention in the pigeon.Behavioral Neuroscience,101, 74–86.
Rolls, E. T. (1994). Brain mechanisms for invariant visual recognition and learning.Behavioural Processes,33, 113–138.
Rolls, E. T., &Baylis, G. C. (1986). Size and contrast have only small effects of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey.Experimental Brain Research,65, 38–48.
Trillmich, F. (1976). Learning experiments on individual recognition in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie,41, 372–395.
Watanabe, S. (1991). Effects of ectostriatal lesions on natural concept, pseudoconcept and artificial pattern discrimination in pigeon.Visual Neuroscience,6, 497–506.
Watanabe, S. (1992). Effects of lesions in the ectostriatum and Wulst on species and individual discrimination in pigeons.Behavioural Brain Research,49, 197–203.
Watanabe, S. (1993a). Effects of the ectostriatal lesions, Wulst lesions and hemispherectomy upon visual discrimination of food in pigeons.Japanese Journal of Physiological Psychology & Psychobiology,1, 12–22.
Watanabe, S. (1993b). Object-picture equivalence in the pigeon: An analysis with natural concept and pseudoconcept discriminations.Behavioural Processes,30, 225–232.
Watanabe, S., Lea, S. E. G., &Dettrich, W. H. (1993). What can we learn from experiments on pigeon concept discrimination? In H.-J. Bischof & H. Zeigler (Eds.),Brain, vision and behavior in birds (pp. 352–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support for this research was provided by Grant in Aid for Scientific Research 0520613.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watanabe, S. Visual discrimination of real objects and pictures in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior 25, 185–192 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199057
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199057