Abstract
Two experiments assessed whether odors left on stimulus objects by experimenters who handle them might confound the interpretation of ostensibly visually guided object-memory tasks for rats. In Experiment 1, rats were able to discriminate the relative recency with which an experimenter touched two otherwise identical objects (intertouch interval = 4 sec), presumably on the basis of an odorintensity discrimination. However, after the rats mastered the odor discrimination with no delay between when the second of the two stimulus objects was last touched by the experimenter and when the rats were permitted to attempt the discrimination, their performance dropped to chance levels when this delay was increased to 15 sec. In Experiment 2, rats were trained in two slightly different ways to perform a delayed-nonmatching-to-sample (DNMS) task, one that involved systematic differences in the temporal order in which the experimenter handled the sample and novel stimulus objects and one that did not. There were no significant differences in the rate at which rats mastered the DNMS task with these two procedures, and the performance of rats that were trained according to the former procedure was unaffected when they were switched to the latter procedure. Moreover, rats required considerably fewer trials to master the DNMS task than the rats in Experiment 1 required to master the odor discrimination. These findings demonstrate that, under certain circumstances, rats can discriminate the relative recency with which two objects are handled by an experimenter, but that this ability contributes little to their performance of conventional object-based DNMS tasks.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burešová, O., &Bureš, J. (1981). Role of olfactory cues in the radial maze performances of rats.Behavioral Brain Research,3, 405–409.
Mishkin, M., &Appenzeller, T. (1987, June). The anatomy of memory.Scientific American,256, 80–89.
Mumby, D. G., &Pinel, J. P. J. (1994). Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats.Behavioral Neuroscience,108, 11–18.
Mumby, D. G., Pinel, J. P. J., &Anzarut, D. S. (1991). A test battery for assessing nonspatial memory in brain-damaged rats.Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,17, 130.
Mumby, D. G., Pinel, J. P. J., &Dastur, F. N. (1993). Mediodorsal thalamic lesions and object recognition in rats.Psychobiology,21, 27–36.
Mumby, D. G., Pinel, J. P. J., Kornecook, T. J., Shen, M. J., &Redila, V. A. (1995). Memory deficits following lesions of hippocampus or amygdala in rat: Assessment by an object-memory test battery.Psychobiology,23, 26–36.
Mumby, D. G., Pinel, J. P. J., &Wood, E. R. (1990). Nonrecurringitems delayed nonmatching-to-sample in rats: A new paradigm for testing nonspatial working memory.Psychobiology,18, 321–326.
Mumby, D. G., Wood, E. R., &Pinel, J. P. J. (1992). Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala.Psychobiology,20, 18–27.
Otto, T., &Eichenbaum, H. (1992). Neuronal activity in the hippocampus during delayed non-match to sample performance in rats: Evidence for hippocampal processing in recognition memory.Hippocampus,2, 323–334.
Roullet, P., Lassalle, J. M., &Jegat, R. (1993). A study of behavioral and sensorial bases of radial maze learning in mice.Behavioral & Neural Biology,59, 173–179.
Wood, E. R., Mumby, D. G., Pinel, J. P. J., &Phillips, A. G. (1993). Impaired object recognition memory in rats following ischemiainduced damage to the hippocampus.Behavioral Neuroscience,107, 51–62.
Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., &Amaral, D. G. (1989). Lesions of the amygdala that spare adjacent cortical regions do not impair memory or exacerbate the impairment following lesions of the hippocampal formation.Journal of Neuroscience,9, 1922–1936.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant to J.P.J.P. from the British Columbia Health Care Research Foundation. D.G.M. was supported by a postgraduate studentship from the Medical Research Council of Canada. E.R.W. was supported by a Commonwealth Scholarship. The authors thank Gerard Martin and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this manuscript, and Maggie Edwards for the drawing in Figure 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mumby, D.G., Kornecook, T.J., Wood, E.R. et al. The role of experimenter-odor cues in the performance of object-memory tasks by rats. Animal Learning & Behavior 23, 447–453 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198944
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198944