Abstract
Spoken sentence comprehension is based upon rapid and complex psychological processes, yielding a constantly fluctuating cognitive load. The aim of this study was to evaluate on-line click monitoring, a classical but poorly exploited experimental method, which should allow for an easy measurement of processing load at any chosen point of experimental sentences. In Experiments 1 and 2, we obtained longer latencies to clicks located at the boundary of reversible object relative clauses than to clicks identically located in subject relatives and to clicks located earlier within object relatives. Experiment 3 further revealed that this effect of syntactic type was specific to transposed object relatives and did not occur with normal object relatives. In Experiment 4, we observed longer latencies with semantically reversible than with irreversible sentences, but no difference between actives and passives. These results were obtained under strict control of potential lexical and phonological biases, and suggest that on-line click monitoring may be one useful tool in the study of sentence comprehension.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, K., &Bever, T. G. (1969). Syntactic structure modifies attention during speech perception and recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,21, 280–290.
Baird, R., &Koslick, J. D. (1974). Recall of grammatical relations within clause-containing sentences.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,3, 165–171.
Berent, I., &Perfetti, C. A. (1993). An on-line method in studying music parsing.Cognition,46, 203–222.
Bertelson, P., &Tisseyre, F. (1972). Lateral asymmetry in the perceived sequence of speech and nonspeech stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 356–362.
Bever, T. G., &Chiarello, R. J. (1974, August 9). Cerebral dominance in musicians and nonmusicians.Science,185, 537–539.
Bever, T. G., Lackner, J. R., &Kirk, R. (1969). The underlying structures of sentences are the primary units of immediate speech processing.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 225–234.
Bever, T. G., Lackner, J. R., &Stolz, W. (1969). Transitional probability is not a general mechanism for the segmentation of speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology,79, 387–394.
Bond, Z. S. (1972). Phonological units in sentence perception.Phonetica,25, 129–139.
Bradshaw, J. L., &Nettleton, N. C. (1988). Monaural asymmetries. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.),Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research (pp. 45–69). New York: Wiley.
Bryden, M. P. (1988). An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.),Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research (pp. 1–43). New York: Wiley.
Caramazza, A., &Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia.Brain & Language,5, 572–583.
Cutler, A., &Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 113–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ferreira, F., &Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 348–368.
Flores d’Arcais, G. B. (1978). The perception of complex sentences. In W. J. M. Levelt & G. B. Flores d’Arcais (Eds.),Studies in the perception of language (pp. 155–185). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Fodor, J. A., &Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 414–420.
Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., &Garrett, M. F. (1974).The psychology of language. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ford, M. (1983). A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 203–218.
Forster, K. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 27–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Forster, K., &Olbrei, I. (1973). Semantic heuristics and syntactic analysis.Cognition,23, 319–347.
Frauenfelder, U., Segui, J., &Mehler, J. (1980). Monitoring around the relative clause.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 328–337.
Frazier, L. (1987). Theories of sentence processing. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.),Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language understanding (pp. 493–522). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garfield, J. L. (1987).Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garrett, M. [F.], Bever, T. [G.], &Fodor, J. [A.] (1966). The active use of grammar in speech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,1, 30–32.
Gough, P. B. (1965). Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 107–111.
Gough, P. B. (1966). The verification of sentences: The effect of delay of evidence and sentence length.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 492–496.
Green, D. W. (1977). The immediate processing of sentences.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 135–146.
Herriot, P. (1969). The comprehension of active and passive sentences as a function of pragmatic expectations.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 166–169.
Holmes, V. M. (1979). Some hypotheses about syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett (pp. 227–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holmes, V. M., &Forster, K. I. (1970). Detection of extraneous signals during sentence recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,7, 297–301.
Holmes, V. M., &O’Regan, J. K. (1981). Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 417–430.
Jarvella, R. L., &Herman, S. J. (1973). Speed and accuracy of sentence recall: Effects of ear of presentation, semantics, and grammar.Journal of Experimental Psychology,97, 108–110.
Keele, S. W. (1986). Motor control. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, pp. 30-1 to 30-60). New York: Wiley.
Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening.Cortex,3, 163–178.
Kinsbourne, M. (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention.Acta Psychologica,33, 193–201.
Ladefoged, P., &Broadbent, D. E. (1960). Perception of sequence in auditory events.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,13, 162–170.
Mehler, J. (1963). Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of English sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,2, 346–351.
Mehler, J., Segui, J., &Carey, P. (1978). Tails of words: Monitoring ambiguity.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 29–35.
Noizet, G., Deyts, F., &Deyts, J. P. (1972). Producing complex sentences by applying relative transformations.Linguistics,89, 49–67.
Reber, A. S. (1973). Locating clicks in sentences: Left, center, and right.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 133–138.
Savin, H. B., &Perchonock, E. (1965). Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,4, 348–353.
Slobin, D. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 219–227.
Stoffer, T. H. (1985). Representation of phrase structure in the perception of music.Music Perception,3, 191–220.
Wanner, E., &Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. A. Miller (Eds.),Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 119–159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, L., Mehler, J. Click monitoring revisited: An on-line study of sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition 24, 94–102 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197275
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197275