Abstract
Watson and Humphreys (1997) have proposed that the ability to prioritize new elements over old elements involves a time-consuming process (of at least 400 msec) of active inhibition of the locations of the old elements, which they referred to asvisual marking. Recently, Donk and Theeuwes (2001) have suggested that prioritized selection of new over old elements is an instantaneous process related to the luminance change accompanying the appearance of the new elements. The aim of the present study was to test these two alternatives by investigating whether prioritized selection of new over old elements could be achieved with a very short preview of the old elements (50 msec). The results indicated that participants were able to prioritize selection of new over old elements when the new elements were presented with luminance onset whereas the old elements were not. New elements could not be prioritized if both the old and the new elements appeared with luminance onset. The results indicated that prioritization of new elements is based on an instantaneous process, rather than on a time-consuming process.
Article PDF
References
Belopolsky, A. V., Theeuwes, J., & Kramer, A. F. (in press). Prioritization by visual transients in search: Evidence against the visual marking account of the preview benefit.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Donk, M., &Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 891–900.
Donk, M., &Theeuwes, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 1231–1242.
Duncan, J., Ward, R., &Shapiro, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision.Nature,369, 313–315.
Humphreys, G. W., Kyllingsb K, S., Watson, D. G., Olivers, C. N. L., Law, I., &Paulson, O. B. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioral and functional imaging procedures.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 610–635.
Jiang, Y., Chun, M.M., &Marks, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 717–730.
Klein, R.M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G.W., &Smith, K. J. (2003). History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture.Psychological Science,14, 181–185.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pratt, J., &McAuliffe, J. (2002). Inhibition of return in visual marking? The importance of the interstimulus interval and the type of search task.Visual Cognition,9, 869–888.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., &Atchley, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 130–134.
Watson, D. G., &Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attention inhibition of old objects.Psychological Review,104, 90–122.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary vs. automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donk, M., Verburg, R.C. Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 282–288 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196571
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196571