Abstract
The present study examined nearly 1,000 tips recorded for two taxicabs, two hair salons, and two restaurants. In each of the six cases, amount of tip increased linearly as a function of the amount of the bill. Contrary to standard microeconomic theory, there was a magnitude effect in that as the amount of the bill increased, the percent tip tended to decrease. The present results extend the findings of Chapman and Winquist (1998), obtained using hypothetical scenarios, to real-world tipping behavior. Chapman and Winquist argued that a magnitude effect in tipping reflects the shape of the utility function for money. We suggest, however, that the magnitude effect may be the mathematical consequence of replotting the fundamental relationship between tip and bill amounts in terms of percent tip, given that the observed linear relation between tip and bill amounts has a positive intercept. We suggest further that the positive intercept arises because a tip represents a judgment as to what constitutes a fair or equitable wage, and part of what constitutes a fair wage is independent of the amount of the bill, reflecting compensation for simply being there when needed. The present account implies that different explanations may be needed for magnitude effects observed in different domains.
Article PDF
References
Bodvarsson, O. B., &Gibson, W. A. (1994). Gratuities and customer appraisal of service: Evidence from Minnesota restaurants.Journal of Socio-Economics,23, 287–302.
Chapman, G. B., &Winquist, J. R. (1998). The magnitude effect: Temporal discount effects and restaurant tips.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 119–123.
Green, L., Fry, A. F., &Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison.Psychological Science,5, 33–36.
Green, L., Myerson, J., &McFadden, E. (1997). Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward.Memory & Cognition,25, 715–723.
Green, L., Myerson, J., &Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 418–427.
Harris, M. B. (1995). Waiters, customers, and service: Some tips about tipping.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,25, 725–744.
Kirby, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 54–70.
Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption.Economic Journal,97, 666–684.
Loewenstein, G., &Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation.Quarterly Journal of Economics,107, 573–597.
Loewenstein, G., &Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies: Intertemporal choice.Journal of Economic Perspectives,3, 181–193.
Lynn, M., &Grassman, A. (1990). Restaurant tipping: An examination of three “rational” explanations.Journal of Economic Psychology,11, 169–181.
Peters, T. J., &Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982).In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
Prelec, D., &Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach.Management Science,37, 770–786.
Raineri, A., &Rachlin, H. (1993). The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,6, 77–94.
Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility.Review of Economic Studies,4, 155–161.
Thaler, R. H. (1992).The winner’s curse: Paradoxes and anomalies of economic life. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH55308 from the National Institute of Mental Health. A preliminary report was presented at the meeting of the Society for the Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, May 2000, Washington, DC.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green, L., Myerson, J. & Schneider, R. Is there a magnitude effect in tipping?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 381–386 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196495
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196495