Abstract
Two different accounts have been proposed to explain the fact that (1) an effect of word frequency is present when readers of transparent orthographies read only words aloud and (2) the effect of word frequency is eliminated when subjects name words and nonwords mixed together in a single block. In the route-shifting account, subjects shift from using a lexical route that can read only words to using a nonlexical route that can read both words and nonwords via the use of sublexical spelling-sound correspondences (hence, no word frequency effect). The essence of the second, time criterion account is that the elimination of the word frequency effect is determined by the speed with which the nonwords are processed, because subjects attempt to homogenize the point in time at which they release an articulation. These two different accounts are pitted against each other in a series of naming experiments utilizing the transparent Turkish orthography. A word frequency effect persists even when words and nonwords are mixed together, provided that nonword sets are matched so as to be named as quickly as the high-frequency words and as slowly as the low-frequency words, respectively. This result is argued to be consistent with the time criterion account, but not with the unadorned route-shifting account.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baluch, B., &Besner, D. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 644–652.
Besner, D. (1999). Basic processes in reading: Multiple routines in localist and connectionist models. In P. A. McMullen & R. M. Klein (Eds.),Converging methods for understanding reading and dyslexia (pp. 413–458). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Besner, D., &Smith, M. C. (1992). Basic processes in reading: Is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking? In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.),Advances in psychology: Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 45–66). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Carr, T. H., &Pollatsek, A. (1985). Recognizing printed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 1–82). San Diego: Academic Press.
Chateau, D., &Lupker, S. J. (2003). Strategic effects in word naming: Examining the route-emphasis versus time-criterion accounts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance29, 139–151.
Coltheart, M. (1980). Reading, phonological recoding and deep dyslexia. In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia (pp. 197–226). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., &Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches.Psychological Review,100, 589–608.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., &Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256.
Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281.
Gordon, B. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 631–645.
Hudson, P. T. W., &Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length in naming and lexical decision tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 46–58.
Katz, L., &Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 157–166.
Kinoshita, S., &Lupker, S. J. (2002). Effects of filler type in naming: Change in time criterion or attentional control of pathways?Memory & Cognition,30, 1277–1287.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., &Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 570–590.
McCann, R. S., &Besner, D. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation and the locus of word frequency effects in word naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 14–24.
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., &Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 452–467.
Paap, K. R., &Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race.Psychological Research,53, 13–24.
Raman, I., Baluch, B., &Sneddon, P. (1996). What is the cognitive system’s preferred route for deriving phonology from print?European Psychologist,1, 221–227.
Rastle, K., &Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 482–503.
Simpson, G. B., &Kang, H. (1994). The flexible use of phonological information in word recognition in Korean.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 319–331.
Tabossi, P., &Laghi, L. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English.Memory & Cognition,20, 303–313.
Taylor, T. E., &Lupker, S. J. (2001). Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 117–138.
Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 439–456.
Zevin, J. D., &Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 121–135.
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., &Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages.Psychological Science,12, 379–384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant A0998 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to D.B. and in part by Middlesex University Psychology Research Fund to I.R.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raman, I., Baluch, B. & Besner, D. On the control of visual word recognition: Changing routes versus changing deadlines. Memory & Cognition 32, 489–500 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195841
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195841