Abstract
Subjects studied pairs of compound words; pair members were presented simultaneously (one above the other) for 2 sec or sequentially (one immediately following the other) for 1 sec each, and 6-sec interstimulus intervals separated the end of presentation of one pair and the start of that of another. A subsequent recognition test includedwithin-pair andbetween-pair conjunction foils (recombinations of stimulus parts from the same study pair and from separate pairs, respectively). Previous experiments using faces as stimuli have demonstrated that when faces are presented simultaneously there are many more false alarms to within-pair than to between-pair conjunction items, and when faces are presented sequentially there is an equal number of false alarms in those two conditions. However, Experiment 1 showed that for compound word stimuli there were equally high false alarm rates to both types of foils in both study conditions relative to completely new test items. Experiment 2 showed that when rehearsal of compound words was prevented, the pattern of conjunction errors was very similar to the one typically obtained for faces. In Experiment 3, subjects falsely recalled conjunctions of withinpair compound words but not conjunctions of between-pair words in the simultaneous-study condition; no conjunctions were recalled in the sequential-study condition. The results support the idea that working memory processing is necessary for binding stimulus parts together in episodic memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, W., Reinitz, M. T., Beusmans, J., &Gopal, S. (1999). Role of attention in spatial learning during simulated route navigation.Environment & Planning A,31, 1459–1472.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., &Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for texts.Cognitive Psychology,11, 177–220.
Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Keys, B. A., Carter, C. S., Cohen, J., Kaye, J. A., Janowsky, J. S., Taylor, S. F., Yesavage, J. A., Mumenthaler, M. S., Jagust, W. J., &Reed, B. R. (2001). Context processing in older adults: Evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 746–763.
Brown, R., &McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 325–337.
Chalfonte, B. L., &Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults.Memory & Cognition,24, 403–416.
Chandler, C. C., &Gargano, G. J. (1998). Retrieval processes that produce interference in modified forced-choice recognition tests.Memory & Cognition,26, 220–231.
Cohen, N. J., &Eichenbaum, H. (1993).Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Goshen-Gottstein, Y., &Moscovitch, M. (1995). Repetition priming effects for newly formed associations are perceptually based: Evidence from shallow encoding and format specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1249–1262.
Hannigan, S. L., &Reinitz, M. T. (2000). Practical factors that influence the likelihood of false recognition: Influences of temporal factors on memory conjunction errors.Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 309–321.
Hannigan, S. L., &Reinitz, M. T. (2001). A demonstration and comparison of two types of inference-based memory errors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 931–940.
Hannigan, S. L., &Reinitz, M. T. (2003). Migration of objects and inferences across episodes.Memory & Cognition,31, 434–444.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Iidaka, T., Anderson, N. D., Kapur, S., Cabeza, R., &Craik, F. I. M. (2000). The effect of divided attention on encoding and retrieval in episodic memory revealed by positron emission tomography.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 267–280.
Jones, T. C., &Jacoby, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory.Journal of Memory & Language,44, 82–102.
Köhler, S., &Moscovitch, M. (1997). Unconscious visual processing in neuropsychological syndromes: A survey of the literature and an evaluation of models of consciousness. In M. D. Rugg (Ed.),Cognitive neuroscience: Studies in cognition (pp. 305–373). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kroll, N. E. A., Knight, R. T., Metcalfe, J., Wolf, E. S., &Tulving, E. (1996). Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 176–196.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., &Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 19–31.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 159–188.
Metcalfe, J. (1990). Composite holographic associative recall model (CHARM) and blended memories in eyewitness testimony.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 145–160.
Moscovitch, M. (2000). Theories of memory and consciousness. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 609–625). New York: Oxford University Press.
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory of the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Reinitz, M. T. (2002). Illusions of memory.Comments on Theoretical Biology,6, 411–430.
Reinitz, M. T., &Demb, J. B. (1994). Implicit and explicit memory for compound words.Memory & Cognition,22, 687–694.
Reinitz, M. T., &Hannigan, S. L. (2001). Effects of simultaneous stimulus presentation and attention switching on memory conjunction errors.Journal of Memory & Language,44, 206–219.
Reinitz, M. T., Lammers, W. J., &Cochran, B. P. (1992). Memoryconjunction errors: Miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory.Memory & Cognition,20, 1–11.
Reinitz, M. T., Morrissey, J., &Demb, J. B. (1994). The role of attention in face encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 161–168.
Reinitz, M. T., Verfaellie, M., &Milberg, W. (1996). Memory conjunction errors in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 286–299.
Rubin, S. R., Van Petten, C., Glisky, E. L., &Newberg, W. M. (1999). Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Event-related potential and neuropsychological data.Cognitive Neuropsychology,16, 459–488.
Schacter, D. L., Kaszniak, A.W., Kihlstrom, J. F., &Valdiserri, M. (1991). The relation between source memory and aging.Psychology & Aging,6, 559–568.
Strong, E. K. (1912). The effect of length of series on recognition memory.Psychological Review,19, 447–462.
Underwood, B. J., Kapelak, S. M., &Malmi, R. A. (1976). Integration of discrete verbal units in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 293–300.
Zechmeister, E. B., &McKillip, J. (1972). Recall of place on the page.Journal of Educational Psychology,63, 446–453.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reinitz, M.T., Hannigan, S.L. False memories for compound words: Role of working memory. Memory & Cognition 32, 463–473 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195839
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195839