Abstract
For listeners to recognize words, they must map temporally distributed phonetic feature cues onto higher order phonological representations. Three experiments are reported that were performed to examine what information listeners extract from assimilated segments (e.g., place-assimilated tokens ofcone that resemblecomb) and how they interpret it. Experiment 1 employed form priming to demonstrate that listeners activate the underlying form of CONE, but not of its neighbor (COMB). Experiment 2 employed phoneme monitoring to show that the same assimilated tokens facilitate the perception of postassimilation context. Together, the results of these two experiments suggest that listeners recover both the underlying place of the modified item and information about the subsequent item from the same modified segment. Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 1, using different postassimilation contexts to demonstrate that context effects do not reflect familiarity with a given assimilation process. The results are discussed in the context of general auditory grouping mechanisms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, P. J. &Summerfield, Q. (1980). Information in speech: Some observations on the perception of [s]- stop clusters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 536–563.
Barry, M. C. (1985). A palatographic study of connected speech processes. InCambridge papers in phonetics and experimental linguistics (Vol. 4., pp. 1–16). University of Cambridge, Department of Linguistics.
Békésy, G. von (1967).Sensory inhibition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Best, C. T., Morrongiello, B., &Robson, R. (1981). Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception.Perception & Psychophysics,29, 191–211.
Boardman, I., Grossberg, S., Myers, C., &Cohen, M. (1999). Neural dynamics of perceptual order and context effects for variable-rate speech syllables.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1477–1500.
Bregman, A. S. (1978). Auditory streaming: Competition among alternative organizations.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 391–398.
Bregman, A. S. (1990).Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bregman, A. S., &Rudnicky, A. (1975). Auditory segregation: Stream or streams?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 263–267.
Browman, C. P., &Goldstein, L. (1990). Articulatory gestures as phonological units.Phonology,6, 201–231.
Coenen, E., Zwitserlood, P., &Bölte, J. (2001). Variation and assimilation in German: Consequences for lexical access and representation.Language & Cognitive Processes,16, 535–564.
Cohen J. D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Cowan, N. (1984). On short and long auditory stores.Psychological Bulletin,96, 341–370.
Darwin, C. J., Turvey, M. T., &Crowder, R. G. (1972). An auditory analog of the Sperling partial report procedure: Evidence for brief auditory storage.Cognitive Psychology,3, 255–267.
Francis, W. N., &Kuïcera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Gaskell, M. G., Hare, M., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). A connectionist model of phonological representation in speech perception.Cognitive Science,19, 407–439.
Gaskell, M. G., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 144–158.
Gaskell, M. G., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1998). Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 380–396.
Gaskell, M. G., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: Bridging the gap.Journal of Memory & Language,44, 325–349.
Goldsmith, J. (1976). Overview of autosegmental phonology.Linguistic Analysis,2, 23–68.
Gow, D. W. (2001). Assimilation and anticipation in continuous spoken word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,45, 133–159.
Gow, D. W. (2002). Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 163–179.
Gow, D. W. (2003).The acoustic manifestation of coronal to labial place assimilation in English. Manuscript in preparation.
Gow, D. W., &Gordon, P. C. (1995). Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: Evidence from priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 344–359.
Gow, D. W., & Hussami, P. (1999, November).Acoustic modification in English place assimilation. Paper presented at the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Columbus, OH.
Gow, D. W., & Im, A. (2001, November).Perceptual effects of native and non-native assimilation. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
Grossberg, S., &Myers, C. W. (2000). The resonant dynamics of speech perception: Interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects.Psychological Review,107, 735–767.
Hartline, H. F., &Ratcliff, F. (1957). Spatial summation of inhibitory influences in the eye of limulus, and the mutual interaction of receptor units.Journal of General Physiology,40, 357–376.
Hodgson, P., &Miller, J. (1996). Internal structure of phonetic cate gories: Evidence for within category trading relations.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,100, 565–576.
Holst, T., &Nolan, F. (1995). The influence of syntactic structure on [s] to [β] assimilation. In B. Connell & A. Arvanti (Eds.),Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in laboratory phonology IV. (pp. 315–333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holt, L. L., Lotto, A. J., &Kluender, K. R. (2001). Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: A case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement?Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,109, 764–774.
Julesz, B., &Hirsh, I. J. (1972). Visual and auditory perception: An essay of comparison. In E. E. David & P. B. Denes (Eds.),Human communication: A unified view (pp. 283–340). New York: McGraw Hill.
Jun, J. (1996). Place assimilation is not the result of gestural overlap.Phonology,13, 337–407.
Kenstowicz, M. (1994).Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Kerswill, P. E. (1985). A sociophonetic study of connected speech processes in Cambridge English: An outline and some results.Cambridge Papers in Phonetics & Experimental Linguistics,4, 1–39.
Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Hartcourt & Brace.
Kuehn, D. P., &Moll, K. L. (1972). Perceptual effects for forward coarticulation.Journal of Hearing & Speech Research,15, 654–664.
Lahiri, A., &Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon.Cognition,38, 245–294.
LaRiviere, C. J., Winitz, H., &Herriman, E. (1975). The distribution of perceptual cues in English prevocalic fricatives.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,3, 613–622.
Lehiste, I., &Shockey, L. (1972). On the perception of coarticulation effects in English CVC syllables.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,15, 500–506.
Lotto, A. J., &Kluender, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 602–619.
Lotto, A. J., Kluender, K. R., &Holt, L. L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica).Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,102, 1134–1140.
Mann, V. A., &Repp, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,69, 548–558.
Manuel, S. Y. (1991). Some phonetic bases for the relative malleability of syllable-final versus syllable initial consonants.Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences,5, 118–121.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism is spoken word-recognition.Cognition,25, 71–102.
Martin, J. G., &Bunnell, H. T. (1981). Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,69, 559–567.
McClelland, J. L., &Elman, J. L. (1986). Interactive processes in speech recognition: The TRACE model. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (pp. 58–121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
McNally, K. A., &Handel, S. (1977). Effect of element composition on streaming and ordering of repeating sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 451–460.
Miller, J. L. (2001). Mapping from acoustic signal to phonetic category: Internal category structure, context effects and speeded categorization.Language & Cognitive Processes,16, 683–690.
Nearey, T. M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception.Journal of Phonetics,18, 347–373.
Nearey, T. M. (1997). Speech perception as pattern recognition.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,101, 3241–3254.
Nolan, F., Holst, T., &Kuhnert, B. (1996). Modeling [s] to [S] accommodation in English.Journal of Phonetics,24, 113–137.
Norris, D. G. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition.Cognition,52, 189–234.
Norris, D. G., McQueen, J., &Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 299–370.
Ostreicher, H. J., &Sharf, D. J. (1976). Effects of coarticulation on the identification of deleted consonant and vowel sounds.Journal of Phonetics,4, 285–301.
Parker, E. M., Diehl, R. L., &Kluender, K. R. (1986). Trading relations in speech and nonspeech.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 129–142.
Petersen, G. E., &Barney, H. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,24, 175–1843.
Pickett, J. M., &Decker, L. R. (1960). Time factors in perception of a double consonant.Language & Speech,3, 11–17.
Pitt, M. A., &McQueen, J. M. (1998). Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon?Journal of Memory & Language,39, 347–370.
Repp, B. H. (1978). Perceptual integration and differentiation of spectral cues for intervocalic stop consonants.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 471–485.
Repp, B. H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception.Psychological Bulletin,92, 81–110.
Repp, B. H. (1983). Bidirectional contrast effects in the perception of VC-CV sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 147–155.
Repp, B. H., Liberman, A. M., Eccardt, T., &Pesetsky, D. (1978). Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative and affricate manner.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 621–637.
Rosenthal, R., &Rosnow, R. L. (1985).Contrast analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., &Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.Science,274, 1926–1928.
Silverman, J., &Jun, J. (1994). Aerodynamic evidence for articulatory overlap in Korean.Phonetica,51, 210–220.
Sinnott, J. M., &Saporita, T. A. (2000). Differences in American English, Spanish, and monkey perception of the say-stay trading relation.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1312–1319.
Smits, R. (2001a). Evidence for hierachical categorization of coarticulated phonemes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1145–1162.
Smits, R. (2001b). Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1109–1139.
Stevens, K. (1998).Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Strange, W. (1987). Information for vowels in formant transitions.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 550–557.
Summerfield, Q., &Haggard, M. (1977). On the dissociation of spectral and temporal cues to the voicing distinction in initial stop consonants.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,62, 435–448.
Treisman, M. (1999). There are two types of psychometric function: A theory of cue combination in the processing of complex stimuli with implications for categorical perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 517–546.
Warren, R. (1985). Criterion shift and perceptual homeostasis.Psychological Review,92, 574–584.
Watson, C. S., Kelly, W. J., &Wroton, H. W. (1976). Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns: II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of uncertainty.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,60, 1176–1186.
Wertheimer, M. (1938). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.),A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, & Trubner. (Original work published 1923)
Whalen, D. H. (1989). Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 284–292.
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., &Soli, S. D. (1981). Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: Perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,70, 966–975.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant R29DC03108 to the Massachusetts General Hospital (D.W.G., Principal Investigator) from the National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gow, D.W. Feature parsing: Feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 575–590 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194584
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194584