Abstract
Earlier work described the presence of a significant connection between an individual's ability to disregard distracting aspects of a visual field in the classical rod-and-frame test (RFT), in which a subject is required to set a rod so that it will appear vertical in the presence of a square frame that is roll tilted from vertical, and in paper-and-pencil tests, in which the subject is required to find a hidden figure embedded in a more complex figure (the Embedded Figures Test [EFT]; see, e.g., Witkin, Dyk, Faterson, Goodenough, & Karp, 1962; Witkin et al., 1954; Witkin, Oltman, Raskin, & Karp, 1971). This has led to a belief in the existence of a bipolar dimension of cognitive style that is utilized in such disembedding tasks—namely, the extent to which an individual is dependent on or independent from the influence of a distracting visual field. The influence of an inducing visual field on the perception of elevation measured by the setting of a visual target to appear at eye level (the visually perceived eye level [VPEL] discrimination) has also been found to be correlated with the RFT. We have thus explored the possible involvement of the dependence/independence cognitive style on the VPEL discrimination. Measurements were made on each of 18 subjects (9 of them female, 9 male) setting a small target to the VPEL in the presence of a pitched visual field across a range of six pitches from −30° (topbackward) to +20° (topforward) and on each of three tests generally recognized as tests of cognitive spatial abilities: the EFT, the Gestalt Completion Test, and the Snowy Pictures Test (SPT). Although there were significant pairwise correlations relating performance on the three cognitive tests (1.73, 1.48, and 1.71), the correlation of each of these three with the slope of the VPEL-versus-pitch function was not significant, as it was with the slope of the perception of visual pitch of the field (PVP)-versus-pitch function. VPEL, PVP, and a cognitive factor separated into three essentially independent factors in a multiple-factor analysis, with the three cognitive tests clustering at the cognitive factor, and with no significant loading on either of the other two factors. From the above considerations and a multiple-factor analytic treatment including additional results from this and other laboratories, we conclude that the cognitive-processing style held to be involved in the performance on the EFT and the perception of vertical as measured by the RFT is not general for egocentric space perception; it does not involve the perception of elevation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annett, M. (1992). Spatial ability in subgroups of left- and right-handers.British Journal of Psychology,83, 495–515.
Asch, S. E., &Witkin, H. A. (1948). Studies in space orientation: II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 455–477.
Bailey, W., Hustmyer, F., &Kristofferson, A. (1961). Alcoholism, brain damage, and perceptual dependence.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol,22, 377–393.
Bennett, D. H. (1956). Perception of the upright in relation to body image.British Journal of Mental Science,102, 487–506.
Brosnan, M. J. (1998). Spatial ability in children's play with Lego blocks.Perceptual & Motor Skills,87, 19–28.
Chance, J. E., &Goldstein, A. G. (1971). Internal-external control of reinforcement and embedded-figures performance.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 33–34.
Crandall, V. J., &Sinkeldam, C. (1964). Children's dependent and achievement behaviors in social situations and their perceptual field dependence.Journal of Personality,32, 1–22.
Ebenholtz, S. M. (1977). Determinants of the rod and frame effect: The role of retinal size.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 531–538.
Ebenholtz, S. M., &Benzschawel, T. L. (1977). The rod and frame effect and induced head tilt as a function of observation distance.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 491–496.
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., &Derman, D. (1976).Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests 1976. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Freedman, R. J., &Rovegno, L. (1981). Ocular dominance, cognitive strategy, and sex differences in spatial ability.Perceptual & Motor Skills,52, 651–654.
Geiringer, E. R., &Hyde, J. S. (1976). Sex differences on Piaget's water-level task: Spatial ability incognito.Perceptual & Motor Skills,42, 1323–1328.
Goldstein, A. G., &Chance, J. E. (1965). Effects of practice on sex-related differences in performance on Embedded Figures.Psychonomic Science,3, 361–362.
Gottschaldt, K. (1926). [Gestalt factors and repetition].Psychologische Forschung,8, 261–317. [English translation and condensation in W. D. Ellis (1958).A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 109–122). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.]
Guzy, L. T., Cohen, M. M., &Ebenholtz, S. M. (2003). Field dependence with pitched, rolled, and yawed visual frame effects. In J. Andre, D. A. Owens, & L. O. Harvey, Jr. (Eds.),Visual perception: The influence of H. W. Leibowitz (pp. 125–141). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hall, C. W., Gregory, G., Billinger, E., &Fisher, T. (1988). Field independence and simultaneous processing in preschool children.Perceptual & Motor Skills,66, 891–897.
Harley, J. P., Kalish, D. I., &Silverman, A. J. (1974). Eye movements and sex differences in field articulation.Perceptual & Motor Skills,38, 615–622.
Howard, I. P. (1986). The perception of posture, self motion, and the visual vertical. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. I. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 18.1–18.62). New York: Wiley.
Howard, I. P., &Templeton, W. B. (1966).Human spatial orientation. New York: Wiley.
Hudson, T. E., Li, W., &Matin, L. (2000). Independence of visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and perceived visual pitch (PVP).Vision Research,40, 2605–2619.
Karp, S. A. (1963). Field dependence and overcoming embeddedness.Journal of Consulting Psychology,27, 294–302.
Karp, S. A., Poster, D. C., &Goodman, A. (1963). Differentiation in alcoholic women.Journal of Personality,31, 386–393.
Li, W., Dallal, N., &Matin, L. (2001). Influences of visual pitch and visual yaw on visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and straight ahead (VPSA) for erect and rolled-to-horizontal observers.Vision Research,41, 2873–2894.
Li, W., &Matin, L. (1996). Visually perceived eye level is influenced identically by lines from erect and pitched planes.Perception,25, 831–852.
Li, W., &Matin, L. (1998). Change in visually perceived eye level without change in perceived pitch.Perception,27, 553–572.
Li, W., &Matin, L. (2005a). The rod-and-frame effect: The whole is less than the sum of its parts.Perception,34, 699–716.
Li, W., &Matin, L. (2005a). Two wrongs make a right: Linear increase of accuracy of visually-guided manual pointing, reaching, and height-matching with increase in hand-to-body distance.Vision Research,45, 533–550.
Li, W., &Matin, L. (2005c). Visually perceived vertical (VPV): Induced changes in orientation by 1-line and 2-line roll-tilted and pitched visual fields.Vision Research,45, 2037–2057.
Linn, M. C., &Peterson, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterisation of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis.Child Development,56, 1479–1498.
Matin, L., &Adkins, D. C. (1954). A second-order factor analysis of reasoning abilities.Psychometrika,19, 71–78.
Matin, L., &Fox, C. F. (1986). Perceived eye level: Elevation jointly determined by visual pitch, EEPI, and gravity.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,27(Suppl.), 333.
Matin, L., &Fox, C. F. (1989). Perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.Vision Research,29, 315–324.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (1992a). Mislocalizations of visual elevation and visual vertical induced by visual pitch: The great circle model. In B. Cohen, D. L. Tomko, & F. E. Guedry,Sensing and controlling motion: Vestibular and sensorimotor function (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 656, pp. 242–265). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (1992b). Visually perceived eye level: Changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 257–289.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (1994a). The influence of the orientation of a stationary single line in darkness on the visual perception of eye level.Vision Research,34, 311–330.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (1994b). Mirror symmetry and parallelism: Two opposite rules for the identity transform in space perception and their unified treatment in the great circle model.Spatial Vision,8, 469–489.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (1994c). Spatial summation among coextensive and parallel line segments across wide separations (50°): Egocentric localization and the great circle model.Vision Research,34, 2577–2598.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (1995). Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation.Journal of Vestibular Research,5, 499–518.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (1999). Averaging and summation of influences on visually perceived eye level between two long lines differing in pitch or roll-tilt.Vision Research,39, 307–329.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (2000). Linear combinations of signals from two lines of the same or different orientations.Vision Research,40, 517–527.
Matin, L., &Li, W. (2001). Neural model for processing the influence of visual orientation on visually perceived eye level (VPEL).Vision Research,41, 2845–2872.
Matin, L., Li, W., Hudson, T., &Hirsch, J. (2001). Perceptions of elevation and orientation: From the stimulus basis to the cerebral cortex.Journal of Vision,1, 195a.
Mihal, W. L., &Barrett, G. V. (1976). Individual differences in perceptual information processing and their relation to automobile accident involvement.Journal of Applied Psychology,61, 229–233.
Morant, R. B., &Beller, H. K. (1965). Adaptation to prismatically rotated visual fields.Science,148, 530–531.
Naylor, G. F. (1965). Subjective judgments of the vertical: An estimate of their nature and consistency.Australian Journal of Psychology,17, 213–216.
O'Donnell, J. P., Paulsen, K. A., &McGann, J. D. (1978). Matching familiar figures test: A unidimensional measure of reflectionimpulsivity?Perceptual & Motor Skills,47, 1247–1253.
Ohlmann, T., &Marendaz, C. (1991). Vicarious processes involved in selection/control of frames of reference and spatial aspects of field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.),Field dependence-independence: Cognitive style across the life span (pp. 105–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Petrusic, W. M., Varro, L., &Jamieson, D. G. (1978). Mental rotation validation of two spatial ability tests.Psychological Research,40, 139–148.
Pizzamiglio, L., &Zoccolotti, P. (1981). Sex and cognitive influence on visual hemifield superiority for face and letter recognition.Cortex,17, 215–226.
Poquin, D., Ohlmann, T., &Barraud, P. A. (1998). Isotropic visual field effect on spatial orientation and egocentric localization.Spatial Vision,11, 261–278.
Post, R. B., Teague, J. M., Welch, R. B., &Hudson, T. E. (2003). Visually perceived eye level with reversible pitch stimuli: Implications for the great circle and implicit surface models.Perception,32, 1073–1092.
Post, R. B., &Welch, R. B. (1996). The role of retinal versus perceived size in the effects of pitched displays on visually perceived eye level.Perception,25, 853–859.
Post, R. B., Welch, R. B., &Clark, V. D. (2000). Why do pitched horizontal lines have such a small effect on visually perceived eye level?Perception & Psychophysics,62, 726–734.
Rhodes, R. J., Carr, J. E., &Jurji, E. D. (1968). Interpersonal differentiation and perceptual field differentiation.Perceptual & Motor Skills,27, 172–174.
Shade, B. J. (1984). Field dependency: Cognitive style or perceptual skill?Perceptual & Motor Skills,58, 991–995.
Shaffer, D. R. (2000).Social and personality development (4th ed.). New York: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Shavit, A. Y., Li, W., Semanek, D., &Matin, L. (2004). Individual differences in sensitivity to induction-by-line: Covariation between perceived elevation (VPEL) and perceived vertical (VPV) [Abstract].Journal of Vision,4, 383a. Available at journalofvision.org/4/8/383/, doi:10.1167/4.8.383.
Sherman, J. (1967). Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning.Psychological Review,74, 290–299.
Stoper, A. E., &Cohen, M. M. (1989). Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 469–475.
Stoper, A. E., &Cohen, M. M. (1991). Optical, gravitational and kinesthetic determinants of judged eye level. In S. R. Ellis & M. K. Kaiser (Eds.),Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 390–403). London: Taylor & Francis.
Street, R. F. (1972).A Gestalt Completion Test (Teachers College, Columbia University. Contributions to Education, no. 481). New York: AMS Press. (Original work published 1931)
Thurstone, L. L. (1944).A factorial study of perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thurstone, L. L. (1947).Multiple-factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wapner, S., &Demick, J. (1991). Some open research problems on field dependence-independence: Theory and methodology. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.),Field dependence-independence: Cognitive style across the life span (pp. 401–429). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Weiner, M. (1955). Effects of training in space orientation on perception of the upright.Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 367–373.
Wenderoth, P. (1982). Fine's frame and perceived tilt.Perceptual & Motor Skills,54, 763–766.
Williams, W. N., LaPointe, L. L., &Riski, J. E. (1974). Lingual discrimination of angular changes of a grooved line by normal subjects.Perceptual & Motor Skills,38, 579–582.
Witkin, H. A. (1949a). Perception of body position and of the position of the visual field.Psychological Monographs: General & Applied,63, 1–46.
Witkin, H. A. (1949b). Sex differences in perception.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences,12, 22–26.
Witkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures.Journal of Personality,19, 1–15.
Witkin, H. A. (1977).Cognitive styles in personal and cultural adaptation (Heinz Werner Lecture Series, Vol. II). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
Witkin, H. A., &Asch, S. E. (1948). Studies in space orientation: IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields.Journal of Experimental Psychology,38, 762–782.
Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., &Karp, S. A. (1962).Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.
Witkin, H. A., &Goodenough, D. R. (1977). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior.Psychological Bulletin,84, 661–688.
Witkin, H. A., &Goodenough, D. R. (1981).Cognitive styles, essence and origins: Field dependence and field independence (Psychological Issues, Monograph 51). New York: International Universities Press.
Witkin, H. A., Karp, S. A., &Goodenough, D. R. (1959). Dependence in alcoholics.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol,20, 493–504.
Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B., &Wapner, S. (1954).Personality through perception. New York: Harper.
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., &Karp, S. A. (1971).A manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work described in this article was supported by Grant EY10534 from the National Eye Institute, NIH.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hudson, T.E., Li, W. & Matin, L. The field dependence/independence cognitive style does not control the spatial perception of elevation. Perception & Psychophysics 68, 377–392 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193684
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193684