Abstract
It has often been suggested that Gestalt-like visual grouping processes may operate preattentively, but Mack and Rock (1998) suggested that no visual grouping takes place under “inattention.” We introduced a new method to assess this. While participants performed a demanding change-detection task on a small matrix at fixation, task-irrelevant background elements were arranged by color similarity into columns, rows, or pseudorandomly. Independent of any change in the target matrix, background grouping could also change or remain the same on each trial. This influenced accuracy of change judgments for the central task, even though background grouping or its change usually could not be explicitly reported when probed with surprise questions as in Mack and Rock. This suggests that visual grouping may arise implicitly under inattention and provides a new method for testing the boundaries of this processing. Here we extended the initial result to changes in background grouping remote from the target and to those occurring across an intervening saccade.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben-Av, M. B., Sagi, D., &Braun, J. (1992). Visual attention and perceptual grouping.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 277–294.
Blackmore, S. J., Brelstaff, G., Nelson, K., &Troscianko, T. (1995). Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes.Perception,24, 1075–1081.
Braun, J., &Sagi, D. (1990). Vision outside the focus of attention.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 45–58.
Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., &Irwin, D. E. (1995). Memory for structural information across eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1441–1458.
Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cuing of visual attention.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 170–178.
Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,36, 28–71.
Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 224–234.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphical system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentations, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Corbetta, M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Drury, H. A., Linenweber, M. R., Petersen, S. E., Raichle, M. E., Van Essen, D. C., &Shulman, G. L. (1998). A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements.Neuron,21, 761–773.
Currie, C. B., McConkie, G. W., Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., &Irwin, D. E. (2000). The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 673–683.
Davis, G., &Driver, J. (1994). Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system.Nature,371, 791–793.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 448–456.
Driver, J., &Baylis, G. C. (1998). Attention and visual object segmentation. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.),The attentive brain (pp. 229–325). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., &Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention and phenomenal objects.Cognition,80, 61–95.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. [W.] (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 578–593.
Enns, J. T., &Rensink, R. (1992).VScope: Vision testing software for the Macintosh. Vancouver, BC: Micropsych Software.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Fernandez-Duque, D., &Thornton, I. M. (2000). Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system?Visual Cognition,7, 323–344.
Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.),Perception (5th ed., pp. 89–110). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hayhoe, M. M., Bensinger, D. G., &Ballard, D. H. (1998). Task constraints in visual working memory.Vision Research,38, 125–137.
Henderson, J. M., &Hollingworth, A. (2003). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 58–71.
Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1987). Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 449–463.
Hollingworth, A., &Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes.Visual Cognition,7, 213–235.
Hollingworth, A., Schrock, G., &Henderson, J. M. (2001). Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene.Memory & Cognition,29, 296–304.
Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., &Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 761–768.
Irwin, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 307–317.
Irwin, D. E., &Andrews, R. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In T. Inui & J. L. Mc-Clelland (Eds.),Attention and performance: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience (Vol. 14, pp. 121–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Irwin, D. E., Zacks, J. L., &Brown, J. S. (1990). Visual memory and the perception of a stable visual environment.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 35–46.
Jonides, J., Irwin, D. E., &Yantis, S. (1982). Integrating visual information from successive fixations.Science,215, 192–194.
Jonides, J., Irwin, D. E., &Yantis, S. (1983). Failure to integrate information from successive fixations.Science,222, 188.
Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions.Nature,290, 91–97.
Kahneman, D., &Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.),Varieties of attention (pp. 29–61). New York: Academic Press.
Kellman, P. J., Yin, C., &Shipley, T. F. (1998). A common mechanism for illusory and occluded object completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 859–869.
Kimchi, R., &Razpurker-Apfeld, I. (2004). Perceptual grouping and attention: Not all groupings are equal.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 687–696.
Kustov, A. A., &Robinson, D. L. (1996). Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements.Nature,384, 74–77.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Lavie, N. (2000). Selective attention and cognitive control: Dissociating attentional functions through different types of load. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 175–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lavie, N., &Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 183–197.
Mack, A., &Rock, I. (1998).Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuma, R., Kahn, S., &Rock, I. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention.Cognitive Psychology,24, 475–501.
McConkie, G. W., &Currie, C. B. (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 563–581.
McConkie, G. W., &Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?Perception & Psychophysics,25, 221–224.
Merikle, P. M., Smilek, D., &Eastwood, J. D. (2001). Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology.Cognition,79, 115–134.
Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., &Franconeri, S. L. (2002). The siren song of implicit change detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 798–815.
Moore, C. M. (2001). Inattentional blindness: Perception or memory and what does it matter?Psyche,7. Available at http://psyche.cs. monash.edu.au/v7/psyche-7-02-moore.html.
Moore, C. M., &Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 339–352.
Moore, C. M., Grosjean, M., &Lleras, A. (2003). Using inattentional blindness as an operational definition of unattended: The case of surface completion.Visual Cognition,10, 299–318.
Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., & Chabris, C. F. (2000). Sustained inattentional blindness: The role of location in the detection of unexpected dynamic events.Psyche,6. Available at http://psyche.cs. monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-14-most.html.
Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., &Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness.Psychological Science,12, 9–17.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Newby, E. A., &Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness as a function of proximity to the focus of attention.Perception,27, 1025–1040.
Newby E. A., &Rock, I. (2001). Location and attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 155–168.
O’Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., &Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking.Visual Cognition,7, 191–211.
O’Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., &Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes.”Nature,398, 34.
Palmer, S. [E.] (1999).Vision science: From photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books; MIT Press.
Palmer, S. [E.], Neff, J., &Beck, D. (1996). Late influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 75–80.
Palmer, S. E., &Nelson, R. (2000). Late influences on perceptual grouping: Illusory figures.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1321–1331.
Palmer, S. [E.], &Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 29–55.
Peterhans, E., &von der Heydt, R. (1989). Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex: II. Contours bridging gaps.Journal of Neuroscience,9, 1749–1763.
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 283–290.
Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., &Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 426–442.
Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., &Henderson, J. M. (1990). Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 199–210.
Rayner, K. (1992). Eye movements and visual cognition. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rees, G., Russell, C., Frith, C. D., &Driver, J. (1999). Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words.Science,286, 2504–2507.
Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection.Annual Review of Psychology,53, 245–277.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (2000). On the failure to detect changes across brief interruptions.Visual Cognition,7, 127–145.
Rock, I., &Broscole, L. (1964). Grouping based on phenomenal proximity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,67, 531–538.
Rock, I., Linnett, C. M., Grant, P., &Mack, A. (1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method.Cognitive Psychology,24, 502–534.
Shapiro, K. L. (2000). Change blindness: Theory or paradigm?Visual Cognition,7, 83–91.
Simons, D. J. (2000a). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 147–155.
Simons, D. J. (2000b). Current approaches to change blindness.Visual Cognition,7, 1–15.
Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 261–267.
Smilek, D., Eastwood, J. D., &Merikle, P. M. (2000). Does unattended information facilitate change detection?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 480–487.
Thornton, I. M., &Fernandez-Duque, D. (2000). An implicit measure of undetected change.Spatial Vision,14, 21–44.
Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 194–214.
Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision.Computer Vision, Graphics & Vision Processing,31, 156–177.
von der Heydt, R., &Peterhans, E. (1989). Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex: I. Lines of pattern discontinuity.Journal of Neuroscience,9, 1731–1748.
Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von Gestalt.Psychologische Forschung,4, 301–350.
Williams, P., &Simons, D. J. (2000). Detecting changes in novel, complex three-dimensional objects.Visual Cognition,7, 297–322.
Wolfe, J. M. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.),Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. J.D. holds a Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russell, C., Driver, J. New indirect measures of “inattentive” visual grouping in a change-detection task. Perception & Psychophysics 67, 606–623 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193518
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193518