Abstract
Visual salience and perceptual load may both influence the efficiency of visual selection. Recently, Gibson and Bryant (2008) showed that perceptual load can dominate color salience in a distractor interference paradigm. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the possibility that knowledge (of color or load) may modulate the relative operation of these two mechanisms. Consistent with previous findings, perceptual load dominated color salience, but only in certain contexts in which display load was mixed and high-load displays preceded other high-load displays. More important, color salience dominated perceptual load in other contexts in which display load was mixed and low-load displays preceded high-load displays. In addition, color salience also dominated perceptual load in contexts in which display load was fixed and advance knowledge of load was available. Altogether, the present findings suggest that the competition between color salience and perceptual load can vary as a function of task context, thereby supporting top-down accounts, although the precise aspect of task context remains to be identified.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496.
Belopolsky, A. V., Zwaan, L., Theeuwes, J., & Kramer, A. F. (2007). The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 934–938.
Bjork, E. L., & Murray, J. T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472–484.
Burnham, B. R. (2007). Displaywide visual features associated with a search display’s appearance can mediate attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 392–422.
Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2009). Perceptual load modulates attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 404–410.
Driver, J. (2001). A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 53–78.
Eltiti, S., Wallace, D., & Fox, E. (2005). Selective target processing: Perceptual load or distractor salience? Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 876–885.
Eriksen, C. W., & Eriksen, B. A. (1979). Target redundancy in visual search: Do repetitions of target within the display impair processing? Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 195–205.
Estes, W. K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 278–286.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030–1044.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
Fournier, L. R., & Shorter, S. (2001). Is evidence for late selection due to automatic or attentional processing of stimulus identities? Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 991–1003.
Gibson, B. S., & Bryant, T. A. (2008). The identity intrusion effect: Attentional capture or perceptual load? Visual Cognition, 16, 182–199.
Gibson, B. S., & Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 699–706.
Gibson, B. S., & Peterson, M. A. (2001). Inattentional blindness and attentional capture: Evidence for attention-based theories of visual salience. In C. L. Folk & B. S. Gibson (Eds.), Attraction, distraction, and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 51–76). New York: Elsevier.
Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. E. (2003). Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 1003–1020.
Lamy, D., & Yashar, A. (2008). Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: Target uncertainty does. Vision Research, 48, 1274–1279.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 451–468.
Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.
Lavie, N., & Cox, S. (1997). On the efficiency of visual selection attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection. Psychological Science, 8, 395–398.
Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183–197.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247–279.
Müller, H. J., Geyer, T., Zehetleitner, M., & Krummenacher, J. (2009). Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1–16.
Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pinto, Y., Olivers, C. N. L., & Theeuwes, J. (2005). Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1354–1361.
Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 489–501.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 799–806.
Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65–70.
Theeuwes, J., & Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1342–1353.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., & Belopolsky, A. V. (2004). Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 697–702.
Torralbo, A., & Beck, D. M. (2008). Perceptual-load-induced selection as a result of local competitive interactions in visual cortex. Psychological Science, 19, 1045–1050.
van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
The authors thank Gregory J. Davis, Bradley A. Dobrzenski, Daniel Fanuele, and Ann C. Flies for their help with data collection.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biggs, A.T., Gibson, B.S. Competition between color salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down set. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 53–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.53
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.1.53