Abstract
There is a longstanding tradition in psychological research for norming lists of words that are used in experimental studies. The present study extends this practice to graphic imagery by obtaining norming data on 24 simple abstract graphic shapes composed of three straight-line segments. The attributes obtained in the norming procedure were the shapes’ familiarity, describability, associability, availability, and potential for word association. Results from rating data indicate significantly different, yet reliable, responses by participants to the various shape configurations. Multidimensional scaling analysis of shape ratings identified two underlying dimensions of perceived differences: thecontinuity of a shape’s linear direction and theconsistency or regularity of its interior angles. By contrast, performance in generating word associations for figures appeared to be linguistically driven, with initial responses related to the similarity of shapes to letters of the alphabet. The norms and the computer program used to collect them can be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alario, F.-X., &Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 531–552.
Bellezza, F. S. (1983). The spatial-arrangement mnemonic.Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 830–837.
Bellezza, F. S. (1986). A mnemonic based on arranging words on visual patterns.Journal of Educational Psychology,78, 217–224.
Bunch, J. M., Seyferth, T., Williams, D., Haun, D., & Kealy, W. A. (2004, April).Symmetrical or not, are “spatial mnemonics” credible aids for learning? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
Clark, J. M., &Paivio, A. (2004). Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 371–383.
Craik, F. I., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. (Original work published 1885. Retrieved October 11, 2005 from psychclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/index.htm)
Jenkins, J. J. (1970). The 1952 Minnesota word association norms. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.),Norms of word association (pp. 1–38). New York: Academic Press.
McDougall, S. J. P., Curry, M. B., &de Bruijn, O. (1999). Measuring symbol and icon characteristics: Norms for concreteness, complexity, meaningfulness, familiarity, and semantic distance for 239 symbols.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 487–519.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved October 02, 2005 from www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
Nishimoto, T., Miyawaki, K., Ueda, T., Une, Y., &Takahashi, M. (2005). Japanese normative set of 359 pictures.Behavior Research Methods,37, 398–416.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Saal, F. E., Downey, R. G., &Lahey, M. A. (1980). Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data.Psychological Bulletin,88, 413–428.
Sadoski, M., &Paivio, A. (1994). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.),Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 582–601). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 174–215.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kealy, W.A., Ritzhaupt, A.D. & Spears, C. Psychological norms for simple three-line graphic shapes. Behavior Research Methods 39, 1012–1019 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192998
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192998