Abstract
Cognitive neuroimaging studies of individual differences seek to reveal brain mechanisms of cognition by associating intersubject variability in brain activation with other variables of interest, such as sex, personality trait, or mood state. The choice of a priori regions of interest (ROIs) raises problems, because the selection criterion is typically consistent activation across prior studies, suggesting little intersubject variability. Here, we introduce a novel approach for selecting regions that are defined on the basis of their variance characteristics, rather than on the basis of their location or because of theoretical expectations. These regions of variance (ROVs) constitute the search space with which to assess how much of the observed variance can be ascribed to specific variables of interest. We compare the ROI and ROV approaches by applying each to the same data set and suggest that the conjunction of both methods may yield the greatest likelihood of capturing the rich relation between brain and behavior, while limiting the search space for statistical analyses and minimizing false positive errors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allman, J. M., Hakeem, A., Erwin, J. M., Nimchinsky, E., & Hof, P. (2001). The anterior cingulate cortex. The evolution of an interface between emotion and cognition. In A. R. Damasio, A. Harrington, J. Kasan, B. S. McEwen, H. Moss, & R. Shailah (Eds.), Unity of knowledge: The convergence of natural and human science (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 935, pp. 107–117). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Amin, Z., Constable, R. T., & Canli, T. (2004). Attentional bias for valenced stimuli as a function of personality in the dot-probe task. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 15–23.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech. Rep. C-1). Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 215–222.
Canli, T., Amin, Z., Haas, B., Omura, K., & Constable, R. T. (2004). A double dissociation between mood states and personality traits in the anterior cingulate. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118, 897–904.
Canli, T., Sivers, H., Whitfield, S. L., Gotlib, I. H., & Gabrieli, J.D.E. (2002). Amygdala response to happy faces as a function of extraversion. Science, 296, 2191.
Canli, T., Zhao, Z., Desmond, J. E., Kang, E., Gross, J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2001). An f MRI study of personality influences on brain reactivity to emotional stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 33–42.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Odessa, FL: PAR Inc.
Eugene, F., Levesque, J., Mensour, B., Leroux, J. M., Beaudoin, G., Bourgouin, P., & Beauregard, M. (2003). The impact of individual differences on the neural circuitry underlying sadness. Neuro-Image, 19, 354–364.
Hamann, S., & Canli, T. (2004). Individual differences in emotion processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 233–238.
Holmes, A. P., & Friston, K. J. (1998). Generalisability, random effects and population inference [Abstract]. NeuroImage, 7, S754.
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introduction to multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
Liotti, M., Mayberg, H. S., Brannan, S. K., McGinnis, S., Jerabek, P., & Fox, P. T. (2000). Differential limbic-cortical correlates of sadness and anxiety in healthy subjects: Implications for affective disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 30–42.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Maldjian, J. A., Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R. A., & Burdette, J. H. (2003). An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. NeuroImage, 19, 1233–1239.
Meriaux, S. (2005, March 25). Problem using ‘ResMS.img’ with SPM2. http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0503&L=spm&O=D&F=&S=&P=43984.
Nichols, T. (2005, March 25). Re: Problem using ‘ResMS.img’ with SPM2. http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0503&L=spm&O=D&F=&S=&P=44436.
Ogawa, S., Lee, T. M., Kay, A. R., & Tank, D. W. (1990). Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 87, 9868–9872.
Phillips, M. L., Drevets, W. C., Rauch, S. L., & Lane, R. (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception: I. The neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 504–514.
Schmahmann, J. D., & Sherman, J. C. (1998). The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain, 121 ^(Pt. 4), 561–579.
Teasdale, J. D., Howard, R. J., Cox, S. G., Ha, Y., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C., & Checkley, S. A. (1999). Functional MRI study of the cognitive generation of affect. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 209–215.
Worsley, K., Marrett, S., Neelin, P., Vandal, A., Friston, K., & Evans, A. (1996). A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human Brain Mapping, 4, 58–73.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was funded by SUNY—Stony Brook and by National Science Foundation Grant BCS-0224221.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Omura, K., Aron, A. & Canli, T. Variance maps as a novel tool for localizing regions of interest in imaging studies of individual differences. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5, 252–261 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.2.252
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.2.252