Abstract
Dutch-learning and English-learning 9-month-olds were tested, using the Headturn Preference Procedure, for their ability to segment Dutch words with strong/weak stress patterns from fluent Dutch speech. This prosodic pattern is highly typical for words of both languages. The infants were familiarized with pairs of words and then tested on four passages, two that included the familiarized words and two that did not. Both the Dutch-and the English-learning infants gave evidence of segmenting the targets from the passages, to an equivalent degree. Thus, English-learning infants are able to extract words from fluent speech in a language that is phonetically different from English. We discuss the possibility that this cross-language segmentation ability is aided by the similarity of the typical rhythmic structure of Dutch and English words.
References
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., &Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of probability statistics by 8-month-old infants.Psychological Science,9, 321–324.
Best, C. T., Lafleur, R., &McRoberts, G. W. (1995). Divergent developmental patterns for infants’ perception of two non-native contrasts.Infant Behavior & Development,18, 339–350.
Carlson, R.,Elenius, K.,Granström, B. &Hunnicutt, S. (1985).Phonetic and orthographic properties of the basic vocabulary of five European languages (Quarterly Progress & Status Report 1985/1, pp. 63-94). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology (RTH), Speech Transmission Laboratory.
Christophe, A., &Morton, J. (1998). Is Dutch native English? Linguistic analysis by 2-month-olds.Developmental Science,1, 215–219.
Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cutler, A., &Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 218–236.
Cutler, A., &Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary.Computer Speech & Language,2, 133–142.
Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. G., &Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 385–400.
Cutler, A., &Norris, D. G. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 113–121.
Cutler, A., &Otake, T. (1994). Mora or phonemes? Further evidence for language-specific listening.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 824–844.
Echols, C. H., Crowhurst, M. J., &Childers, J. B. (1997). Perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 202–225.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Wright Cassidy, K., Druss, B., &Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for young infants.Cognition,26, 269–286.
Jusczyk, P. W. (1997).The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). A reply to Littman and to Denenberg.Science,280, 1176–1177.
Jusczyk, P. W., &Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants’ detection of sound patterns of words in fluent speech.Cognitive Psychology,29, 1–23.
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., &Redanz, N. (1993). Preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words.Child Development,64, 675–687.
Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J., Svenkerud, V. Y., &Jusczyk, A. M. (1993). Infants’ sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 402–420.
Jusczyk, P. W., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Kennedy, L., Woodward, A., &Piwoz, J. (1992). Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants.Cognitive Psychology,24, 252–293.
Jusczyk, P. W., Hohne, E. A., &Bauman, A. (1999). Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1465–1476.
Jusczyk, P. W., Houston, D., &Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants.Cognitive Psychology,39, 159–207.
Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., &Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 630–645.
Kemler Nelson, D. G., Jusczyk, P. W., Mandel, D. R., Myers, J., Turk, A., &Gerken, L. A. (1995). The Headturn Preference Procedure for testing auditory perception.Infant Behavior & Development,18, 111–116.
Kuijpers, C. T. L., Coolen, R., Houston, D., &Cutler, A. (1998). Using the head-turning technique to explore cross-linguistic performance differences.Advances in Infancy Research,12, 205–220.
McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., &Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 621–638.
Mehler, J., Dommergues, J. Y., Frauenfelder, U., &Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 298–305.
Mehler, J., Jusczyk, P. W., Lambertz, G., Halsted, N., Bertoncini, J., &Amiel-Tison, C. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants.Cognition,29, 144–178.
Morgan, J. L. (1996). A rhythmic bias in preverbal speech segmentation.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 666–688.
Myers, J., Jusczyk, P. W., Kemler Nelson, D. G., Charles-Luce, J., Woodward, A. L., &Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1996). Infants’ sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech.Journal of Child Language,23, 1–30.
Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., &Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Towards an understanding of the role of rhythm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 756–766.
Newsome, M., &Jusczyk, P. W. (1995). Do infants use stress as a cue for segmenting fluent speech? In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.),Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 415–426). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., &Mehler, J. (1993). Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 258–278.
Otake, T., Hatano, G., &Yoneyama, K. (1996). Speech segmentation by Japanese listeners. In T. Otake & A. Cutler (Eds.),Phonological structure and language processing: Cross-linguistic studies (pp. 183–201). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rietveld, A. C. M., &Koopmans-van Beinum, F. J. (1987). Vowel reduction and stress.Speech Communication,6, 217–229.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., &Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.Science,274, 1926–1928.
Schreuder, R., &Baayen, R. H. (1994). Prefix stripping re-revisited.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 357–375.
van de Weijer, J. (1998).Language input for word discovery. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Nijmegen.
Vroomen, J., van Zon, M., &de Gelder, B. (1996). Cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperceptions and word spotting.Memory & Cognition,24, 744–755.
Werker, J. F., &Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual re-organization during the first year of life.Infant Behavior & Development,7, 49–63.
Woodward, J. Z., &Aslin, R. N. (1990, Month).Segmentation cues in maternal speech to infants. Paper presented at the 7th biennial meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Montreal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a National Research Scientist Predoctoral Award to D.M.H. and by Research Grant 15795 from NICHD and Senior Scientist Award 01490 from NIMH to P.W.J. The study in The Netherlands was conducted while D.M.H. was a visitor at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. The authors are grateful to Joost Beekman for assistance recruiting and testing subjects in The Netherlands and Niels Janssen for computing frequency analyses of the vowels in the target words. The authors also thank Nuria Sebastian-Galles and Ann Marie Jusczyk for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houston, D.M., Jusczyk, P.W., Kuijpers, C. et al. Cross-language word segmentation by 9-month-olds. Psychon Bull Rev 7, 504–509 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214363
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214363