Abstract
Rabbits were trained in eyelid conditioning with a “backward” arrangement of unconditioned stimulus (UCS) followed by conditioned stimulus (CS). When such a CS was tested alone it was observed to produce substantial conditioned responding if the UCS had been arranged to be “surprising” during the backward pairings, but not if it had been arranged to be “expected.” The comparisons were made in a within-subjects design where the surprisingness of the UCS on the different pairing occasions was manipulated by preceding the UCS by discriminative CSs which were otherwise either never followed by the UCS (CS−) or consistently followed by the UCS (CS+). The results may have implications for the nonmonotonic course of responding seen during backward conditioning, as a UCS is at first surprising, but then expected on the basis of contextual cues.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bernstein, A. L. Temporal factors in the formation of conditioned eyelid reactions in human subjects. Journal of General Psychology, 1934, 10, 173–197.
Champion, R. A., & Jones, J. E. Forward, backward, and pseudoconditioning of the GSR. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961, 62, 58–61.
Gormezano, I., & Moore, J. W. Classical conditioning. In M. H. Marx (Ed.),Learning: processes. Toronto: Macmillan, 1969.
Karris, J. D. Forward conditioning, backward conditioning, pseudoconditioning and adaptation to the conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1941, 28, 491–502.
Heth, C. P. Simultaneous and backward Pavlovian conditioning as a function of number of CS-UCS pairings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, 1974.
Kamin, L. J. “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.),Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior. Aversive stimulation. Miami: University of Miami Press, 1968.
Kirrble, G. A.Hilgard and Marquis’ conditioning and learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1961.
Krane, R. V., & Wagner, A. R. Taste aversion learning with a delayed shock US: Implications for the “generality of the laws of learning.” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975, 88, 882–889.
Moscovitch, A., & LoLordo, V. M. Role of safety in the Pavlovian backward fear conditioning procedure. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968, 66, 673–678.
Osgood, C. E.Method and theory in experimental psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.
Pavlov, I. P.Lectures on conditioned reflexes. New York: International Publishers, 1928.
Plotkin, R. C., & Oakley, P. A. Backward conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975, 88, 586–590.
Siegel, S., & Domjan, M. Backward conditioning as an inhibitory procedure. Learning and Motivation, 1971, 2, 1–11.
Smith, M. C., Coleman, S. R., & Gormezano, I. Classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-UCS intervals. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969, 69, 226–231.
Spooner, A., & Kellogg, W. N. The backward conditioning curve. American Journal of Psychology, 1947, 60, 321–334.
Terry, W. S., & Wagner, A. R. Short-term memory for “surprising” vs. “expected” USs in Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1975, 1, 122–133.
Wagner, A. R. Priming in STM: An information processing mechanism for self-generated or retreival-generated depression in performance. In T. J. Tighe and R. N. Leaton (Eds.),Habituation. Perspectives from child development,animal behavior, and neurophysiology. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (in press).
Wagner, A. R. Elementary associations. In H. H. Kendler & J. T. Spence (Eds.),Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.
Wagner, A. R., Rudy, J. W., & Whitlow, J. W. Rehearsal in animal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 97, 407–426.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant BM574-20521 to Allan R. Wagner.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, A.R., Terry, W.S. Backward conditioning to a CS following an expected vs. a surprising UCS. Animal Learning & Behavior 3, 370–374 (1975). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213461
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213461