Abstract
A pool of 128 schematic faces was generated by varying brow, mouth, nose, eye height, and eye shape. Ratings of meaningfulness (how easy it was to find an adjective describing the face) and meaning (the adjective given to the face) were mainly a function of brow and mouth. When brow and mouth were horizontal, faces were least meaningful and neutral in expression; if either brow or mouth moved from the horizontal, faces increased in meaningfulness, meaning being dependent on the moving feature; when both brow and mouth moved from the horizontal, faces were most meaningful, and their expression was a function of the combination of brow and mouth.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bradshaw, J. L. The information conveyed by varying the dimensions of features in human outline faces. Perception & Psychophysics. 1969, 6, 5–9.
Brunswik, E., & Reiter, L. Eindrucks-chaxactere schematiserter Gesichter. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 1937, 142, 67–134.
Buzby, D. E. The interpretation of facial expressions. American Journal of Psychology. 1924, 35, 602–604.
Clark, H. J. Recognition memory for random shapes as a function of complexity, association value and delay Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965, 69, 590–595.
Davitz. J. R.The communtcation of emotional meaning. New York. McGraw-Hill, 1964.
Dunlap, K. The role of eye-muscles and mouth-muscles in the expression of the emotions. Genetic Psychology Monograph, 1927, 2, 199–233.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P.Emotion in the human face. New York: Pergamon Press, 1972.
Feleky, A M The expression of the emotions. Psychological Review. 1914, 21, 3341.
Friedman, M. P., Reed, S. K., & Carterette, E. C. Feature saliency and recognition memory for schematic faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 10, 47–50.
Frijda, N. H. The understanding of facial expression of emotion. Acta Psychologica, 1953, 9, 294–362.
Frois-Wittman, J. The ludgement of facial expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1930, 13, 113–151.
Garner, W. R. The stimulus in information processing. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 350–358.
Hanawalt, N. G. The role of the upper and lower parts of the face as the basis for judging facial expressions: II. In posed expressions and “candid camera” pictures. Journal of General Psychology. 1944, 31, 23–36.
Harrison, R. P. Pictic analysis: Toward a vocabulary and syntax for the pictorial code, with research on facial communication Unpublished doctoral thesis, Michigan State University, 1964
Kanner, L. Judging emotions from facial expressions. Psychology Monograph, 1931, 41(3, Whole No. 186)
Kothurkar, V. K Effect of interpolated recall on recognition of schematic faces. Journal of Psychological Researches, 1965, 1, 11–14.
Landis, C The interpretation of facial expression in emotion Journal of General Psychology. 1929, 2, 59–72.
Langfeld, H. S. The judgement of emotions from facial expressions. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 1918, 13, 172–184,
Munn, N. L. The effect of knowledge of the situation upon judgment of emotion from facial expressions. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology. 1940, 35, 324–338.
Plutchik, R.The emotions: Facts, theories and a new model. New York: Random House, 1962.
Reed, S. K. Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 382–407.
Rohracher, H. The psychological institute of the University of Vienna: Psychology of expressions. Acta Psychologica, 1951, 8, 201–233. Ruckmick, C. A. A preliminary study of the emotions.
Psychology Monograph, 1921, 30(Nos. 134–139), 30-35.
Samuels, M. R. Judgement of faces. Character & Personality, 1939, 8, 18–27.
Secord, P. F., & Muthard, J. Personalities in faces: IV. A descriptive analysis of the perception of women’s faces, and the identification of some physiognomic determinants Journal of Psychology, 1955, 39, 269–278.
Tversky, A., & Krantz, D H. Similarity of schematic faces A test of interdimensional additivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 124–128.
Tversky, B. Pictorial and verbal encoding in a short-term memory task. Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 6, 225–233.
Vanderplas, J. M. & Garvin, E. A. The association value of random shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 57, 147–154.
Winer, B. J.Stattsttcal prtnciples in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1962.
Zusne, L.Visttalperceptton of form. New York: Academic Press. 1970. Chap. 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This report is based on a rating study of schematic faces carried out while the author was a graduate student at McGill University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mckelviet, S.J. The meaningfulness and meaning of schematic faces. Perception & Psychophysics 14, 343–348 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212402
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212402