Abstract
Seven experiments were conducted to replicate, and extend, a finding by Tipper, Driver, and Weaver (1991). They reported evidence for dynamic, object-centered inhibition of return (IOR)—that is, coding of inhibition following a peripheral cue in coordinates that move with the previously cued object, providing a dynamic bias against reattending to that object. The present experiments used a variation of Posner and Cohen’s (1984) spatial cuing paradigm. Subjects responded manually (simple reaction time) to a luminance increment in one of two peripheral boxes, one of which had previously been cued (brightened). Experiments 1, 2, and 5 replicated the standard (environmental) IOR effect when the display was stationary. IOR was more marked for right-side targets than for left-side targets and tended to be affected by the compatibility between response hand and (cued) target position. However, when the boxes moved around the display center (Experiments 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7), contrary to Tipper et al., there was no evidence of dynamic, object-centered IOR. Rather, there was strong evidence of attentive tracking of whatever box happened to move from left to right, irrespective of the direction of its motion (clockwise or counterclockwise) and whether it was more likely to contain the target than the other (right-to-left moving) box. There was a tendency for left-to-right tracking to be more marked with right-hand responses, pointing to the existence of a dynamic stimulus-response compatibility effect. The implications of the present findings for the role of attentive tracking and IOR in dynamic scenes are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 467–477.
Braddick, O. (1974). A short-range process in apparent motion.Vision Research,14, 519–527.
Castiello, U., &Umiltà, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 837–848.
Cavanagh, P. (1992, September 11). Attention-based motion perception.Science,257, 1563–1565.
Cavanagh, P. (1993). The perception of form and motion.Current Biology,3, 177–182.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Crawford, T. J., &Müller, H. J. (1992). Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements.Vision Research,32, 293–304.
Dick, M., Ullman, S., &Sagi, D. (1987, July 24). Parallel and serial processes in motion detection.Science,237, 400–402.
Downing, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 188–202.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egly, R., Rafal, R. D., & Henik, A. (1992, November). Reflexive and voluntary orienting in detection and discrimination tasks. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
Finley, G. A. (1985). A high-speed point plotter for vision research.Vision Research,25, 1993–1997.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 317–329.
Gawryszewski, L. G., Riggio, L., Rizzolatti, G., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues.Neuropsychologia,25, 19–29.
Gibson, B. S., &Egeth, H. (1994a). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence from temporal order judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 669–680.
Gibson, B. S., &Egeth, H. (1994b). Inhibition of return to objectbased and environment-based locations.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 323–339.
Halligan, P. W., &Marshall, J. C. (1989). Laterality of motor response in visuo-spatial neglect: A case study.Neuropsychologia,27, 1301–1307.
Heywood, S., &Churcher, J. (1980). Structure of the visual array and saccadic latency: Implications for oculomotor control.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 335–341.
Hodgson, T. L., &Müller, H. J. (1995). Evidence relating to premotor theories of attention. In J. M. Findlay, R. W. Kentridge, & R. Walker (Eds.),Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes, and applications (pp. 305–316). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hodgson, T. L., Müller, H. J., & O’Leary, M. J. (1995). Attentional localization prior to simple and directed manual responses. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Honda, H., &Findlay, J. M. (1992). Saccades to targets in threedimensional space: Dependence of saccadic latency on target location.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 167–174.
Humphreys, G. W., &Müller, H. J. (1993). SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search.Cognitive Psychology,25, 43–110.
Ivry, R. B., &Cohen, A. (1990). Dissociation of short- and long-range apparent motion in visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 317–331.
Joanette, Y., Brouchon, M., Gauthier, L., &Samson, M. (1986). Pointing with left versus right hand in left visual field neglect.Neuropsychologia,24, 391–396.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., &Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information.Cognitive Psychology,24, 175–219.
Kingstone, A., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1992, June). Covert orienting in the split brain. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Quebec.
Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787.
McConkie, G. W., &Rayner, K. (1976). Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,8, 365–368.
Müller, H. J. (1995). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Discrete or continuous interaction? Unpublished manuscript.
Müller, H. J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1991). Luminance-increment detection: Capacity-limited or not?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 107–124.
Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (1995). Attentional tracking of moving objects. Manuscript in preparation.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment of analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory.Neuropsychologia,9, 97–113.
Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., &Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers.Brain & Language,14, 174–180.
Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211–218.
Possamaï, C.-A. (1991). A responding hand effect in a simple-RT precueing experiment: Evidence for a late locus of facilitation.Acta Psychologica,77, 47–63.
Previc, F. H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,13, 519–575.
Pylyshyn, Z. W., &Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism.Spatial Vision,3, 151–224.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Rayner, K., &Bertera, J. H. (1979, October 26). Reading without a fovea.Science,206, 468–469.
Rizzolatti, G., &Gallese, V. (1988). Mechanisms and theories of spatial neglect. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 1, pp. 223–246). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., &Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favour of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 31–40.
Robertson, I. H., &North, N. (1993). Active and passive activation of left limbs: Influence on visual and sensory neglect.Neuropsychologia,31, 193–300.
Schmidt, W., Klein, R. M., & Müller, H. J. (1995). Temporal order judgments do not reveal “inhibition of return”: A commentary on Gibson and Egeth (1994). Manuscript submitted for publication.
Shepherd, M. (1984). EMDISP: A visual display system with digital and analogue sampling.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,16, 297–302.
Simon, J. R., Sly, P. E., &Vilapakkam, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions towards the stimulus source.Acta Psychologica,47, 63–81.
Terry, K. M., Valdes, L. A., &Neill, W. T. (1994). Does “inhibition of return” occur in discrimination tasks?Perception & Psychophysics,55, 279–286.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., &Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 289–298.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., &Burak, A. L. (1994). Objectbased and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 478–499.
Treisman, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Yantis, S. (1992). Multi-element visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization.Cognitive Psychology,24, 295–340.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture.Current Directions in Psychological Science,2, 156–161.
Yantis, S., &Gibson, B. S. (1994). Object continuity in apparent motion and attention.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 182–204.
Yantis, S., &Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 295–340.
Yantis, S., &Jones, E. (1991). Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 166–178.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by SERC Grant GR/H/54966 to H.J.M. The authors would like to thank Scott Little and Kate Parmenter for their help with conducting some of the experiments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Müller, H.J., Von Mühlenen, A. Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 224–249 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211877
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211877