Abstract
In studies using Averbach and Coriell’s (1961) partial-report bar-probe paradigm with linear arrays, most errors involve the naming of an item that was in the display but in a position other than the cued one. Up to now, there is no general agreement on the origin of these location errors. Point of departure in this paper is that part of the location errors arises from inappropriate application of the cue. It is tested whether this originates from problems to perceive the position of the cue (“cue-displacement hypothesis”) or from confusion about the order of the items in the array (“item-order hypothesis”). The results of two bar-probe experiments are reported. A novel, crucial, finding in both experiments is that, among the location errors, there was a preponderance of response letters that came from the central side of the cued item. In the second experiment, this was observed not only in the usual postcue conditions but also when the cue preceded the array. These results positively corroborate the cue-displacement hypothesis and do not support the item-order hypothesis: The cue tends to be perceived more toward the center of the visual field than it actually is exposed—that is, there is a central drift of the cue.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Averbach, E., &Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision.Bell System Technical Journal,40, 309–328.
Bedell, H. E., &Flom, M. C. (1981). Monocular spatial distortion in strabismic amblyopia.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,20, 263–268.
Butler, B. E., Mewhort, D. J. K., &Tramer, S. C. (1987). Location errors in tachistoscopic recognition: Guesses, probe errors, or spatial confusion?Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 339–350.
Campbell, A. J., &Mewhort, D. J. K. (1980). On familiarity effects in visual information processing.Canadian Journal of Psychology,34, 134–154.
Dixon, P., &Di Lollo, V. (1991). Effects of display luminance, stimulus type, and probe duration on visible and schematic perception.Canadian Journal of Psychology,45, 54–74.
Eriksen, C.W. (1990). Attentional search of the visual field. In D. Brogan (Ed.),Visual search (pp. 3–19). London: Taylor & Francis.
Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention.American Journal of Psychology,83, 330–342.
Estes, W. K. (1978). Perceptual processing in letter recognition and reading. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception IX (pp. 163–220). New York: Academic Press.
Estes, W. K., Allmeyer, D. H., &Reder, R. M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 1–15.
Fryklund, I. (1975). Effects of cued-set spatial arrangement and target-background similarity in the partial-report paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 375–386.
Hagenaar, R., &van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). On the relation between type of arrays and type of errors in partial-report bar-probe studies.Acta Psychologica,88, 89–104.
Hagenzieker, M. P., van der Heijden, A. H. C., &Hagenaar, R. (1990). Time courses in visual-information processing: Some empirical evidence for inhibition.Psychological Research,52, 13–21.
Harcum, E. R. (1964). An isolation effect in pattern perception similar to that in serial learning.Perceptual & Motor Skills,19, 855–860.
Harcum, E. R. (1970). Defining shape for perceptual element-position curves.Psychological Bulletin,74, 362–372.
Irwin, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 307–317.
Irwin, D. E., &Brown, J. S. (1987). Tests of a model of informational persistence.Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 317–338.
Irwin, D. E., &Yeomans, J. M. (1986). Sensory registration and informational persistence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 343–360.
Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioural sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1977). Naming and locating simultaneously and sequentially presented letters.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 293–302.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Thomas, E. A. C. (1976). Extracting identity and location information from briefly presented letter arrays.Perception & Psychophysics,20, 243–258.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Thomas, E. A. C. (1977). Effect of level of confusability on reporting letters from briefly presented visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 269–279.
Leibowitz, H. W., Myers, N. A., &Grant, D. A. (1955). Frequency of seeing and radial localization of single and multiple visual stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 369–373.
Lowe, D. G. (1975). Processing of information about location in brief visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 309–316.
Mateeff, S., &Gourevich, A. (1983). Peripheral vision and perceived visual direction.Biological Cybernetics,49, 111–118.
Mateeff, S., &Gourevich, A. (1984). Brief stimuli localization in visual periphery.Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgarica,10, 64–71.
Mateeff, S., &Hohnsbein, J. (1988). Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away.Vision Research,28, 711–719.
Mewhort, D. J. K. (1987). Information stores and mechanisms: Early stages in visual processing. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 335–357). New York: Erlbaum.
Mewhort, D. J. K., Butler, B. E., Feldman-Stewart, D., &Tramer, S. (1988). “Iconic memory,” location information, and the bar-probe task: A reply to Chow (1986).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 729–737.
Mewhort, D. J. K., &Campbell, A. J. (1978). Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 93–101.
Mewhort, D. J. K., Campbell, A. J., Marchetti, F. M., &Campbell, J. I. D. (1981). Identification, localization, and “iconic memory”: An evaluation of the bar-probe task.Memory & Cognition,9, 50–67.
Mewhort, D. J. K., Marchetti, F. M., &Campbell, A. J. (1982). Blank characters in tachistoscopic recognition: Space has both a symbolic and a sensory role.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 559–575.
Mitrani, L., &Dimitrov, G. (1982). Retinal location and visual localization during pursuit eye movement.Vision Research,22, 1047–1051.
O’Regan, J. K. (1984). Retinal versus extraretinal influences in flash localization during saccadic eye movements in the presence of a visible background.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 1–14.
Osaka, N. (1977). Effect of refraction on perceived locus of a target in the peripheral visual field.Journal of Psychology,95, 59–62.
Rauk, M., &Luuk, A. (1980). Identification and detection of spatial position in one-dimensional pattern. InProblems of cognitive psychology (Acta et Commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis, Vol. 522, pp. 143–163). Tartu, Estonia: Tartu Riiklik Ülikool.
Rose, D., &Halpern, D. L. (1992). Stimulus mislocalization depends on spatial frequency.Perception,21, 289–296.
Skavenski, A. A. (1990). Eye movement and visual localization of objects in space. In E. Kowler (Ed.),Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 263–287). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Snyder, C. R. R. (1972). Selection, inspection and naming in visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology,92, 428–431.
Townsend, V. M. (1973). Loss of spatial information following a tachistoscopic exposure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,98, 113–118.
van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1986). On selection in vision.Psychological Research,48, 211–219.
van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992).Selective attention in vision. New York: Routledge.
van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1993). The role of position in object selection in vision.Psychological Research,56, 44–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagenaar, R., Van Der Heijden, A.H.C. Location errors in partial-report bar-probe experiments: In search of the origin of cue-alignment problems. Memory & Cognition 25, 641–652 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211305
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211305