Abstract
The effect on the number of letters S can report of the duration of each sequentially presented letter was compared with that of processing time, defined as the time from the onset of a letter to the onset of the next letter. Four Ss were each shown 1250 common English words, from four to eight letters long, one letter at a time. Each letter acted as a visual noise field for the preceding letter. The duration of each letter and the interval between letters was varied independently. The S reported the letters he saw after each word was displayed. It was found that the processing time (onset to onset) predicted the number of letters correctly reported, regardless of the partition between on time and off time. A calculation was made of the number of milliseconds of on plus off time that are needed to ensure correct report of each letter. This time was independent of the duration of the processing time, but was positively correlated with the number of letters in the word. This correlation is probably in part artifactual, so that no claim can be made that it takes longer to process a letter of a long as compared to a short word.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
AARONSON, D. Temporal factors in perception and short-term memory. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67, 130–144.
HABER, R. N. Information processing analyses of visual perception: An introduction. In R. N. Haber (Ed.),Information processing approaches to visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1969. Pp. 1–15.
HABER, R. N., & STANDING, L. G. Direct measures of short-term visual storage. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 21, in press.
RAYMOND, B., & GLANZER, M. Continuity of exposure length effects in tachistoscopic perception. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 7, 287–288.
SCHARF, B., ZAMANSKY, H. S., & BRIGHTBILL, H. S. Word recognition with masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 110–112.
SPERLING, G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 1960, 74 (Whole No. 498), 1–29.
SPERLING, G. A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 1963, 5, 19–31.
SPERLING, G. Successive approximations to a model for a short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 1967, 27, 285–292.
THORNDIKE, E. L., & LORGE, I.A teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press, 1944.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the United States Public Health Service, MH-10753, and by grants from the National Science Foundation, GB-2909, GB-5910, and GB-4547, to the first author. The authors would like to thank Barbara Herr for her assistance with some of the data analyses.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haber, R.N., Nathanson, L.S. Processing of sequentially presented letters. Perception & Psychophysics 5, 359–361 (1969). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210658
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210658