Abstract
Watkins, LeCompte, and Kim (2000) suggested that the recall advantage for rare words in mixed lists is due to a compensatory study strategy that favors the rare words. They found the advantage was reversed when rare and common words were studied under incidental learning conditions. The present study investigated the possibility that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is also the result of a compensatory study strategy. Experiment 1 replicated the findings of Watkins et al. that the rareword advantage in recall is eliminated under incidental learning conditions. In contrast, Experiment 2 showed that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is maintained under both intentional and incidental learning conditions. Experiment 3 replicated the results of Experiments 1 and 2 using different stimuli and a different orienting task. Finally, Experiment 4 showed that the rare-word advantage in recognition is maintained with pure lists. These findings show that the rare-word advantage in recognition memory is not the result of a compensatory study strategy. Instead, rare words are encoded more distinctively than common words, irrespective of participants’ intention to remember them.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, L. R., &Garton, R. F. (1968). The influence of word-knowledge on the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.Psychonomic Science,10, 401–402.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Review,79, 97–123.
Arndt, J., &Reder, L. M. (2002). Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process interpretation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 830–842.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &Gulikers, L. (1995).CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Balota, D. A., &Neely, J. H. (1980). Test-expectancy and wordfrequency effects in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 576–687.
Clark, S. E., &Burchett, R. E. R. (1994). Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall.Memory & Cognition,22, 55–62.
DeLosh, E. L., &McDaniel, M. A. (1996). The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1136–1146.
Dewhurst, S. A., &Hitch, G. J. (1999). Cognitive effort and recollective experience in recognition memory.Memory,7, 129–146.
Dewhurst, S. A., Hitch, G. J., &Barry, C. (1998). Separate effects of word frequency and age of acquisition in recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 284–298.
Dewhurst, S. A., &Parry, L. A. (2000). Emotionality, distinctiveness, and recollective experience.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 541–551.
Duchek, J. M., &Neely, J. H. (1989). A dissociative word-frequency × levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.Memory & Cognition,17, 148–162.
Earhard, B. (1982). Determinants of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,10, 115–124.
Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience.Memory & Cognition,16, 309–313.
Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition.Memory & Cognition,18, 23–30.
Gerhand, S., &Barry, C. (1999). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition,27, 592–602.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.
Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., &Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory.Psychological Review,100, 546–567.
Glanzer, M., &Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 21–31.
Gorman, A. M. (1961). Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,61, 23–29.
Greene, R. L., &Thapar, A. (1994). Mirror effect in frequency discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 946–952.
Gregg, V. H. (1976). Word frequency, recognition, and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp. 183–216). New York: Wiley.
Gregg, V. H., Montgomery, D., &Castano, D. (1980). Recall of common and uncommon words from single and mixed lists.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 240–245.
Hirshman, E., &Arndt, J. (1997). Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1306–1323.
Hirshman, E., &Palij, M. (1992). Rehearsal and the word frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 477–484.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,3, 306–340.
Joordens, S., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
Kim, K., &Glanzer, M. (1993). Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 638–652.
Kinoshita, S. (1995). The word frequency effect in recognition memory versus repetition priming.Memory & Cognition,23, 569–580.
Kučcera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
MacLeod, C. M., &Kampe, K. E. (1996). Word frequency effects in recall, recognition, and word fragment completion tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 132–142.
Malmberg, K. J., &Nelson, T. O. (2003). The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,31, 35–43.
Malmberg, K. J., Steyvers, M., Stephens, J. D., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2002). Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,30, 607–613.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
May, R. B., &Tryk, H. E. (1970). Word sequence, word frequency, and free recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,24, 299–304.
McClelland, J. L., &Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory.Psychological Review,105, 724–760.
McCormack, P. D. (1972). Recognition memory: How complex a retrieval system?Canadian Journal of Psychology,26, 19–41.
McCormack, P. D., &Swenson, A. L. (1972). Recognition memory for common and rare words.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 72–77.
Mutter, S. A., &Hashtroudi, S. (1987). Cognitive effort and the word frequency effect on recognition and lexical decision.American Journal of Psychology,100, 93–116.
Rajaram, S. (1996). Perceptual effects on remembering: Recollective processes in picture recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 365–377.
Rao, K. V., &Proctor, R. W. (1984). Study-phase processing and the word frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 386–394.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 156–163.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—Retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1998). The effectiveness of retrieval from memory. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.),Rational models of cognition (pp. 73–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1–12.
Watkins, M. J., LeCompte, D. C., &Kim, K. (2000). Role of study strategy in recall of mixed lists of common and rare words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 239–245.
Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 681–690.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dewhurst, S.A., Brandt, K.R. & Sharp, M.S. Intention to learn influences the word frequency effect in recall but not in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 32, 1316–1325 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206322
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206322