Abstract
Comparisons were made between cortical evoked responses obtained under two conditions: (1) while Ss were reading, and (2) while they were attempting to count auditory signals. The amplitudes of evoked responses to low-detectability auditory stimuli were found to be approximately doubled when the Ss were required to count the number of stimuli, as compared to amplitudes recorded when they were reading. The duration of the response was also markedly increased. These increases in response amplitude and duration are considerably greater than those observed in earlierexperiments, where high-levelsignalswere used. Inter-S variability of the waveform of the averageevoked response was observed to be much less when the Ss counted the stimuli. In another experiment the level of the auditory signalwas varied over a range of approximately +4 to -4 decibels relative to the listeners’ behavioral thresholds. The per cent of signalswhich they counted varied from near-zero to 100, over this range, and the evoked response concurrently showed a variation from “unmeasureable” to approximately 8 microvolts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BATES, J. A. Electrical activity of the cortex accompanying movement.J. Physiol., (Lond.) 1951, 113, 240–257.
CHAPMAN, R. M., & BRAGDON, H. R. Evoked responsesto numerical and non-numerical visual stimuli while problem solving.Nature, (Lond.) 1964, 203, 1155–1157.
DAVIS, H. Enhancement of evoked cortical potentials in humans related to a task requiring a decision.Science, 1964, 145, 182–183.
DAVIS, H., & YOSHIE, N. Human evoked cortical responses to auditory stimuli.PhysioL, 1963, 6, 164.
DAVIS, H.Personal communication, 1968.
DEBECKER, J., & DESMEDT, J. S. Rate of intramodality SWitching disclosed by sensory evoked potentials averaged during signal detection tests.J. PhysioL, (Lond.) 1966, 185, 52–82.
DONCHIN, E., & COHEN, L. Averagedevoked potentials and intramodality selective attention.EEG elin. NeurophysioL, 1967, 22, 537–546.
DONCHIN, E., & UNDSLEY, D. B. Averagedevoked potentials and reaction time to visualstimuli.EEG elin. Neurophysiol., 1966, 20, 217–223.
GARCIA-AUST, E., BOZACZ, H., & NANZULU, A. Effects of attention upon visualevoked responses.EEG clin. NeurophysioL, 1964, 17, 136–143.
GOLDSTEIN, R. Electroencephalic audiometry. In A. Bruce Graham (Ed.),Sensorineural hearing processes and disorders. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1967.
GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
GROSS, M. M., BEGLEITER, H., TOBIN, M., & KISSIN, B. Auditory evoked response comparison during counting clicks and reading.EEG clin. Neurophysioi; 1965, 18, 451–454.
JANE, J., SMIRNOV, G., & JASPER, H. Effects of distraction upon simultaneous visual and auditory evoked potentials.EEG elin. Neurophysiol., 1962, 14, 344–358.
LARSON, L. Correlation between the psychological significance of stimuli and the magnitudes of the startle blink and evoked EEG potentials in man.Acta physiol. Scand., 1960, 48, 276–294.
ONISHI, S., & DAVIS, H. Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.. 1968. in Dress.
SALTERFIEID, J. H. Evoked cortical response enhancement and attention in man. A study of responses to auditory and shock stimuli.EEG clin. NeurophysioL, 1967, 19, 470–475.
SPONG, P., HAIDER, M., & UNDSLEY, D. B. Selective attentiveness and cortical evoked responses to visual and auditory stimuli.Science, 1965, 148, 395–397.
WATSON, C. S., FRANKS, J. R., & HOOD, D. C. Detection of tones in the absence of external masking noise.J. Acoust. Soc. A mer., 1967, 42, 1194.
WILKINSON, R., & MORLOCK, H. Auditory evoked response and reaction time.EEG elin. Neurophysiol., 1967, 23, 50–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in’ full by a U.S. Public Health Service, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare research grant from the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness. The authors wish to express their appreciation to Dr. Donald H. Eldredge for making available the facilities of the Electrophysiology Laboratory at Central Institue for the Deaf, for this work. We also thank Dr. Hallowell Davis and Dr. James D. Miller for their advice and criticism throughout the course of these experiments. 1
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03209548.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mast, T.E., Watson, C.S. Attention and auditory evoked responses to low-detectability signals. Perception & Psychophysics 4, 237–240 (1968). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206309
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206309