Abstract
Despite a dismal reputation, olfaction’s resolving power actually appears to be keen, especially when the contaminating influence of noise in the stimulus is discounted from psychophysical performance. In a previous investigation, subjects were able to resolve a change of 4% in the concentration of butyl alcohol. In the present experiment, these same subjects resolved a change of 9% in the concentration of amyl butyrate. The data imply that resolving power varies among odorants. The growth of odor intensity assessed by magnitude estimations of easily discriminable (i.e., grossly different) concentrations also varies among odorants. These observations prompt the question: Does an odorant for which resolution is relatively difficult lead to slower growth of perceived intensity with concentration than an odorant for which resolution is easy? In a scaling experiment, amyl butyrate indeed led to slower growth of intensity than butyl alcohol. Nevertheless, amyl alcohol, which permitted poorer resolution than butyl alcohol, led to approximately the same rate of growth as butyl alcohol. Accordingly, growth of odor intensity with concentration may correlate only weakly with resolving power.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aharonson, E. F., Menkes, H., Gurtner, G., Swift, D. L., &Proctor, D. F. Effect of respiratory airflow rate on removal of soluble vapors by the nose.Journal of Applied Physiology, 1974,37, 654–657.
Cain, W. S. Differential sensitivity for smell: “Noise” at the nose.Science, 1977,195, 796–798. (a)
Cain, W. S. Physical and cognitive limitations on olfactory processing in human beings. In D. Müller-Schwarze & M. M. Mozell (Eds.),Chemical signals in vertebrates. New York: Plenum, 1977. Pp. 287–302. (b)
Cain, W. S., &Moskowitz, H. R. Psychophysical scaling of odor. In A. Turk, J. W. Johnston, Jr., & D. G. Moulton (Eds.),Human responses to environmental odors. New York: Academic Press, 1974. Pp. 1–32.
Cattell, J. McK. On errors of observation.American Journal of Psychology, 1893,5, 285–293.
Crozier, W. J., &Holway, A. H. On the law for minimal discrimination of intensities. I.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1937,23, 23–28.
Egan, J. P.Signal detection theory and ROC analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Gamble, E. A. McC. The applicability of Weber’s law to smell.American Journal of Psychology, 1898,10, 82–142.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1965.
Haring, H. G. Vapor pressures and Raoult’s law deviations in relation to odor enhancement and suppression. In A. Turk, J. W. Johnson, Jr., & D. G. Moulton (Eds.),Human responses to environmental odors. New York: Academic Press, 1974. Pp. 199–226.
Hornung, D. E., &Mozell, M. M. Factors influencing the differential sorption of odorant molecules across the olfactory mucosa.Journal of General Physiology, 1977,69, 343–361.
Marks, L. E.Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Mueller, C. G. Frequency of seeing functions for intensity discrimination at various levels of adapting intensity.Journal of General Physiology, 1951,34, 463–474.
Schacknow, P. N., &Raab, D. H. Intensity discrimination of tone bursts and the form of the Weber function.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 449–450.
Stevens, S. S.Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural and social prospects. New York: Wiley, 1975.
Stone, H. Behavioral aspects of absolute and differential olfactory sensitivity.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1964,116, 527–534.
Stone, H., &Bosley, J. J. Olfactory discrimination and Weber’s law.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965,20, 657–665.
Teghtsoonian, R. On the exponents in Stevens’ law and the constant in Ekman’s law.Psychological Review, 1971,78, 71–80.
Zwaardemaker, H.L’Odorat. Paris: Doin, 1925.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research was supported by Grant ES-00592 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cain, W.S. Odor magnitude: Coarse vs. fine grain. Perception & Psychophysics 22, 545–549 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198761
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198761