Abstract
Two experiments explored individual differences in memory and comprehension for adults presented information on television. Experiment 1 tested the correlation between comprehension of television and reading with young adults. The ability to comprehend these two forms of media was significantly correlated (r = .69). This finding is contrary to results from our previous study with third and sixth graders (Pezdek, Lehrer, & Simon, 1984). Experiment 2 probed two specific individual differences factors as predictors of television comprehension. The results were that good television comprehenders (1) had higher visual/spatial ability, as assessed by psychometric test performance, and (2) were more likely to utilize an imagery-based strategy in the sentence-picture verification task of Clark and Chase (1972) (e.g., “STAR IS ABOVE PLUS”). These results suggest differences in the comprehension processes that operate on information presented in different forms of media.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, D. R., &Lorch, E. P. (1983). Looking at television: Action or reaction? In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (Eds.),Understanding children’s television (pp. 1–33). New York: Academic Press.
Berry, C., Gunter, B., &Clifford, B. (1981). Memory for televised information: A problem for applied and theoretical psychology.Current Psychological Reviews,1, 171–192.
Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification.Psychological Review,82, 45–73.
Catlin, J., &Jones, N. K. (1976). Verifying affirmative and negative sentences.Psychological Review,83, 497–501.
Clark, H. H., &Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of companng sentences against pictures.Cognitive Psychology,3, 472–517
Curtis, M. E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill.Journal of Educational Psychology,72, 656–669.
Frederiksen, J. R. (1982). A componential theory of reading skills and their interactions. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 125–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greenfield, P. M. (1987). Electronic technologies, educanon, and cognitive development. In D. Berger, K. Pezdek, & W. P. Banks (Eds.),Applications ofcognitive psychology: Problem solving, education and computing (pp. 17–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gunter, B., Berry, C., &Clifford, B. R. (1981). Release from proactive interference with television news Items: Further evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 480–487.
Hunt, E. B. (1978). Mechanics of verbal ability.Psychological Review,85, 109–130.
Hunt, E. B., Lunneborg, C. E., &Lewis, J. (1975). What does it mean to be high verbal?Cognitive Psychology,7, 194–227.
Laberge, D., &Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology,6, 293–323.
Macleod, C. M., Hunt, E. B., &Mathews, N. N. (1978). Individual differences in the verification of sentence-picture relationshipsJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behovior,17, 493–507.
Neuman, W. R. (1976). Patterns of recall among television news viewers.Public Opinion Quarterly,40, 115–123.
Patberg, J., Dewitz, P., &Samuels, S. J. (1981). The effect of context on the size of the perceptual unit used in word recognition.Journal of Reading Behavior,13, 33–48.
Pezdek, K., &Hartman, E. F. (1983). Children’s television viewing: Attention and comprehension of auditory versus visual information.Child Development,54, 1015–1023.
Pezdek, K., Lehrer, A., &Simon, S. (1984). The relationship between reading and cognitive processing of television and radio.Child Development,55, 2072–2082.
Pezdek, K., Simon, S., Mackenzie, L., & Macbride, L. (1985, Apnl).Individual differences in television and text comprehension. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto.
Pezdek, K., &Stevens, E. (1984). Children’s memory for auditory and vrsual information on television.Developmental Psychology,20, 212–218.
Roper Organization, Inc. (1979).Public perceptions of television and other mass media: A twenty-year review 1959- 1978. New York: Television Information Office.
Salomon, G. (1983). Television literacy and television vs. lIteracy. In R. W. Bailey & R. M. Fosterm (Eds.),Literacy for life: The demand for reading and writing. New York: The Modem Language Association of America.
Salomon, G., &Cohen, C. C. (1977). Television formats, mastery of mental skills and the acquisition of knowledge.Journal of Educational Psychology,69, 612–619.
Samuels, S. J., Laberge, D., &Bremer, C. (1978). Units of word recognition: Evidence for developmental changes.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 715–720.
Stevenson, H. W., Parker, T., Wilkinson, A., Heglon, A., &Fish, E. (1976). Longitudinal study of individual differences in cognitive development and scholastic achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology,68, 377–400.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carroll, J. M., &Bever, T. G. (1976). Sentence-picture verification models as theories of sentence comprehension: A critique of Carpenter and Just.Psychological Review,83, 310–317.
Tversky, B. (1975). Pictorial encoding of sentences in sentence-picture verification.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,27, 405–410.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We appreciate the assistance we received from Jim Martin and Mike Slovik at Claremont High School and thank their students for participating in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pezdek, K., Simon, S., Stoeckert, J. et al. Individual differences in television comprehension. Memory & Cognition 15, 428–435 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197732
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197732