Abstract
Erickson and Kruschke (2002b) have shown that human subjects generalize category knowledge in a rule-like fashion when exposed to a rule-plus-exception categorization task. This result has remained a challenge to exemplar models of category learning. We show that these models can account for such performance, if they are augmented with exemplar-specific specificity or exemplar-specific attention. This result, however, is only achieved if the choice rule that converts evidence for competing categories into probabilities is sensitive to small differences between evidence values close to 0. Exemplar-specific attention provided the best overall approximation of the data. Exemplar-specific specificity provided a slightly worse approximation, but it predicted better the rule-like generalization pattern observed.
Article PDF
Refereces
Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,19, 716–723.
Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., &Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.Psychological Review,105, 442–481.
Ashby, F. G., &Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 33–53.
Ashby, F. G., &Maddox, W. T. (1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,37, 372–400.
Erickson, M. A., &Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 107–140.
Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (2002a).Multiple representations in inductive category learning: Evidence of stimulus- and task-dependent representation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Erickson, M. A., &Kruschke, J. K. (2002b). Rule-based extrapolation in perceptual categorization.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 160–168.
Goffe, W. L., Ferrier, G. D., &Rogers, J. (1994). Global optimization C of statistical functions with simulated annealing.Journal of Econometrics,60, 65–99.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.Psychological Review,99, 22–44.
McKinley, S. C., &Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 128–148.
Minda, J. P., &Smith, J. D. (2001). Prototypes in category learning: The effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 775–799.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 87–108.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1989). Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 279–290.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 3–27.
Nosofsky, R. M., Clark, S. E., &Shin, H. J. (1989). Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 282–304.
Nosofsky, R. M., &Johansen, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of “multiple-system” phenomena in perceptual categorization.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 375–402.
Nosofsky, R. M., &Kruschke, J. K. (2002). Single-system models and interference in category learning: Commentary on Waldron and Ashby (2001).Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 169–174.
Nosofsky, R. M., &Zaki, S. R. (2002). Exemplar and prototype models revisited: Response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.28, 924–940.
Palmeri, T. J., &Nosofsky, R. M. (1995). Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 548–568.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 353–363.
Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization.Cognitive Psychology,3, 382–407.
Sakamoto, Y., &Love, B. C. (2004). Schematic influences on category learning and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 534–553.
Sakamoto, Y., Matsuka, T., &Love, B. C. (2004). Dimension-wide vs. exemplar-specific attention in category learning and recognition. In M. Lovett, C. Schunn, C. Lebiere, & P. Munro (Eds.),Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 261–266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shin, H. J., &Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 278–304.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant SFRH/BD/8614/2002 to P.M.R. from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues, P.M., Murre, J.M.J. Rules-plus-exception tasks: A problem for exemplar models?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 640–646 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196814
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196814