Abstract
We studied categorization in pigeons, using carefully controlled photographs. Within daily sessions, 4 pigeons had to classify each of 32 photographs into either its proper basic-level category (cars, chairs, flowers, or people; four-key forced choice procedure) or its proper superordinate-level category (natural or artificial; two-key forced choice procedure). The pigeons successfully classified the same stimuli at both levels. Overall, the pigeons learned the basic discrimination more quickly than the superordinate discrimination, but this difference was reliable only for artificial stimuli (cars and chairs), not for natural stimuli (flowers and people). The pigeons also exhibited reliable discrimination transfer to novel photographs, attesting to the open-endedness of these basic and superordinate categories.
Article PDF
References
Astley, S. L., &Wasserman, E. A. (1992). Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons: All negative stimuli are not created equal.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 193–207.
Aust, U., &Huber, L. (2001). The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,29, 107–119.
Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F., Jr., &Knauss, K. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 219–234.
D’Amato, M. R., &Van Sant, P. (1988). The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 43–55.
Edwards, C. A., &Honig, W. K. (1987). Memorization and “feature selection” in the acquisition of natural concepts in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,18, 235–260.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A.. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Greene, S. L. (1983). Feature memorization in pigeon concept formation. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 4. Discrimination processes (pp. 209–231). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Hampton, J. A. (2001). The role of similarity in natural categorization. In U. Hahn & M. Ramscar (Eds.),Similarity and categorization (pp. 13–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1984). Objects, categories, and discriminative stimuli. In H. L. Roitblat, T. C. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 233–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concept in the pigeon.Science,146, 549–551.
Lubow, R. E. (1974). High-order concept formation in the pigeon.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 475–483.
Mandler, J. M., &McDonough, L. (2000). Advancing downward to the basic level.Journal of Cognition & Development,1, 379–403.
Mareschal, D., &Quinn, P. C. (2001). Categorization in infancy.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,5, 443–450.
Markman, E. M. (1989).Categorization and naming in children: Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Poole, J., &Lander, D. G. (1971). The pigeon’s concept of pigeon.Psychonomic Science,25, 157–158.
Ribar, R. J., Oakes, L. M., &Spalding, T. L. (2004). Infants can rapidly form new categorical representations.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 536–541.
Roberts, W. A., &Mazmanian, D. S. (1988). Concept learning at different levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,14, 247–260.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., &BoyesBraem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8, 382–439.
Sands, S. F., Lincoln, C. E., &Wright, A. A. (1982). Pictorial similarity judgments and the organization of visual memory in the rhesus monkey.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,111, 369–389.
Schrier, A. M., &Brady, P. M. (1987). Categorization of natural stimuli by monkeys (Macaca mulatta): Effects of stimulus set size and modification of exemplars.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,13, 136–143.
Smith, E. E., &Medin, D. L. (1981).Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smith, J. E. K. (1982). Simple algorithms for M-alternative forcedchoice calculations.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 95–96.
Vonk, J., &McDonald, S. E. (2002). Natural concepts in a juvenile gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) at three levels of abstraction.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,78, 315–332.
Wasserman, E. A., DeVolder, C. L., &Coppage, D. J. (1992). Nonsimilarity-based conceptualization in pigeons via secondary or mediated generalization.Psychological Science,3, 374–378.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH47313.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lazareva, O.F., Freiburger, K.L. & Wasserman, E.A. Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 1111–1117 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196745
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196745