Abstract
Two lexical decision experiments were conducted to study the locus of age-of-acquisition (AoA) effects in skilled readers with English or Dutch as their first language. AoA effects have generally been explained in terms of phonological processing. In Experiment 1, Dutch elementary school and secondary school students were presented with words factorially manipulated on surface frequency and AoA). Two main effects and an interaction were found, confirming findings reported for English speakers by Gerhand and Barry (1999). In addition, a language development effect was established: AoA effects decreased with reading age. Elementary school students showed the largest AoA effects. Experiment 2 used two groups of subjects. The first group consisted of Dutch students enrolled in a master’s degree program in English. The second group consisted of native speakers of English. All subjects were presented with the experimental set of words used by Gerhand and Barry (1999). British subjects showed the same response pattern as reported by Gerhand and Barry (1999). The question of interest was whether Dutch subjects would show an AoA effect on the English set or not. The answer was affirmative. Dutch subjects produced identical response patterns as the British group, showing only an overall 94-msec latency delay. This result challenges predictions of the phonological completeness hypothesis. Alternative accounts in terms of semantic processing are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, T., &van Rijn, H. (1993).The Celex lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 560–585.
Brown, G. D. A., &Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming frequency.Memory & Cognition,15, 208–216.
Brysbaert, M., Lange, M., &Van Wijnendaele, I. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,12, 65–85.
Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I., &De Deyne, S. (2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks.Acta Psychologica,104, 15–226.
Burnage, G. (1990).CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen: CELEX.
Ellis, A. W., &Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflects loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1103–1123.
Ellis, A. W., &Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 515–523.
Gerhand, S., &Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 267–283.
Gerhand, S., &Barry, C. (1999). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition,27, 592–602.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1982). Word age-of-acquisition and lexical decision making.Acta Psychologica,50, 21–34.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Watson, F. L. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition effects: A review.Current Psychological Research,1, 215–226.
Harley, T. (2001).The psychology of language. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Izura, C., &Ellis, A. E. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages.Psicológica,23, 245–281.
Kohnstamm, G. A., Schaerlaekens, A. M., de Vries, A. K., Akkerhuis, G. W., &Froonincksx, M. F. (1981).Nieuwe streeflijst woordenschat voor 6-jarigen [New target vocabulary list for 6-year-old children]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Kroll, J. F., &Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 149–174.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
Lewis, M. B., Gerhand, S., &Ellis, H. D. (2001). Re-evaluating ageof-acquisition effects: Are they simply cumulative-frequency effects?Cognition,78, 189–205.
Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 107–128.
Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 331–353.
Meschyan, G., &Hernandez, A. (2002). Age of acquisition and word frequency: Determinants of object-naming speed and accuracy.Memory & Cognition,30, 262–269.
Monaghan, J., &Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representation.Reading & Writing,15, 759–788.
Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 116–133.
Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., &Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 705–714.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of word information in word recognition.Psychological Review,76, 165–178.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Schneider, W. (1988).Micro experimental laboratory user’s guide: Computer techniques for real time experimental experimentation. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Turner, J. E., Valentine, T., &Ellis, A. W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision.Memory & Cognition,26, 1282–1291.
Van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A. (1985).Voorstelbaarheidswaarden van Nederlandse woorden [Imageability norms for Dutch words]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
Van Orden, G. C., &Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1269–1291.
Zevin, J. D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001).Cumulative frequency affects reading aloud; frequency trajectory does not. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Zevin, J. D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 1–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Assink, E.M.H., van Well, S. & Knuijt, P.P.N.A. Age-of-acquisition effects in native speakers and second-language learners. Memory & Cognition 31, 1218–1228 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195805
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195805