Abstract
Recognizing a well-known melody (e.g., one’s national anthem) is not an all-or-none process. Instead, recognition develops progressively while the melody unfolds over time. To examine which factors govern the time course of this recognition process, the gating paradigm, initially designed to study auditory word recognition, was adapted to music. Musicians and nonmusicians were presented with segments of increasing duration of familiar and unfamiliar melodies (i.e., the first note, then the first two notes, then the first three notes, and so forth). Recognition was assessed after each segment either by requiring participants to provide a familiarity judgment (Experiment 1) or by asking them to sing the melody that they thought had been presented (Experiment 2). In general, the more familiar the melody, the fewer the notes required for recognition. Musicians judged music’s familiarity within fewer notes than did nonmusicians, whereas the reverse situation (i.e., musicians were slower than nonmusicians) occurred when a sung response was requested. However, both musicians and nonmusicians appeared to segment melodies into the same perceptual units (i.e., motives) in order to access the correct representation in memory. These results are interpreted in light of the cohort model (Marslen-Wilson, 1987), as applied to the music domain.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann, G., Wathanasin, S., Birkett, T., &Russell, P. (1992).Experimenter program. Brighton, U.K.: University of Sussex, Network Analysis Ltd.
Attneave, F., &Olson, R. K. (1971). Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling.American Journal of Psychology,84, 147–166.
Bartlett, J. C., &Dowling, W. J. (1980). Recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 501–515.
Berthier, J. E. (1979).1000 chants [1,000 songs]. Paris: Presses de l’Ile-de-France.
Bigand, E., &Parncutt, R. (1999). Perceiving musical tension in long chord sequences.Psychological Research,62, 237–254.
Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience.Psychological Bulletin,109, 204–223.
Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Cotton, S., &Grosjean, F. (1984). The gating paradigm: A comparison of successive and individual presentation formats.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 41–48.
Deliége, I. (1987). Grouping conditions in listening to music: An approach to Lerdahl and Jackendoff`s grouping preference rules.Music Perception,4, 325–360.
Deutsch, D. (1972). Octave generalization and tune recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 411–412.
Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies.Psychological Review,85, 341–354.
Dowling, W. J. (1984). Musical experience and tonal scales in the recognition of octave-scrambled melodies.Psychomusicology,4, 13–32.
Dowling, W. J., &Fujitani, D. S. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 524–531.
Dowling, W. J., &Harwood, D. L. (1986).Music cognition. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Dowling, W. J., &Hollombe, A. W. (1977). The perception of melodies distorted by splitting into several octaves: Effects of increasing proximity and melodic contour.Perception & Psychophysics,21, 60–64.
Frauenfelder, U. H. (1996). Computational models of spoken word recognition. In T. Dijkstra & K. de Smedt (Eds.),Computational psycholinguistics: AI and connectionist models of human language processing. London: Taylor & Francis.
Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 267–283.
Grosjean, F. (1996). Gating.Language & Cognitive Processes,11, 597–604.
Halpern, A. R., Bartlett, J. C., &Dowling, W. J. (1995). Aging and experience in the recognition of musical transpositions.Psychology & Aging,10, 325–342.
Handel, S. (1989).Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hébert, S., &Peretz, I. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners?Memory & Cognition,25, 518–533.
Idson, W. L., &Massaro, D. W. (1978). A bidimensional model of pitch in the recognition of melodies.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 551–565.
Johnson, N. F., &Pugh, K. R. (1994). A cohort model of visual word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,26, 240–346.
Kallman, H. J., &Massaro, D. W. (1979). Tone chroma is functional in melody recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,26, 32–36.
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing.Psychological Review,100, 609–639.
Koriat, A., &Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 34–53.
Krumhansl, C. L. (1990).Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Shepard, R. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 579–594.
Lerdahl, F., &Jackendoff, R. S. (1983).A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.Cognition,25, 71–102.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., &Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions during word-recognition in continuous speech.Cognitive Psychology,10, 29–63.
Narmour, E. (1990).The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Palmer, C., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1987a). Independent temporal and pitch structures in determination of musical phrases.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 116–126.
Palmer, C., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1987b). Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: Effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 505–518.
Peretz, I. (1989). Clustering in music: An appraisal of task factors.International Journal of Psychology,24, 157–178.
Peretz, I., Babaï, M., Lussier, I., Hébert, S., &Gagnon, L. (1995). Corpus d’extraits musicaux: Indices relatifs á la familiarité, à l’âge d’acquisition et aux évocations verbales.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 211–239.
Peretz, I., Gagnon, L., &Bouchard, B. (1998). Music and emotion: Perceptual determinants, immediacy, and isolation after brain damage.Cognition,68, 111–141.
Peretz, I., Gaudreau, D., &Bonnel, A.-M. (1998). Exposure effects on music preference and recognition.Memory & Cognition,26, 884–902.
Peynircioĝlu, Z. F., Tekcan, A. I., Wagner, J. L., Baxter, T. L., &Shaffer, S. D. (1998). Name or hum that tune: Feeling of knowing for music.Memory & Cognition,26, 1131–1137.
Protopapas, A. (1999). Connectionist modeling of speech perception.Psychological Bulletin,125, 410–436.
Schellenberg, E. G. (1996). Expectancy in melody: Tests of the implication-realization model.Cognition,58, 75–125.
Schellenberg, E. G., Iverson, P., &McKinnon, M. C. (1999). Name that tune: Identifying popular recordings from brief excerpts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 641–646.
Smith, J. D. (1997). The place of musical novices in music science.Music Perception,14, 227–262.
Smith, J. D., Nelson, D. G., Grohskopf, L. A., &Appleton, T. (1994). What child is this? What interval was that? Familiar tunes and music perception in novice listeners.Cognition,52, 23–54.
Tyler, L. K. (1984). The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 417–427.
Tyler, L. K., &Wessels, J. (1985). Is gating an on-line task? Evidence from naming latency data.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 217–222.
Walley, A. C., Michela, V. L., &Wood, D. R. (1995). The gating paradigm: Effects of presentation format on spoken word recognition by children and adults.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 343–351.
White, B. W. (1960). Recognition of distorted melodies.American Journal of Psychology,73, 100–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research was supported by a doctoral scholarship from the Groupe de Recherche en Neuropsychologie Expérimentale (University of Montreal) to S.D.B., a fellowship from the Fonds Concertés de l’Aide à la Recherche to N.A., and a grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada to I.P.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bella, S.D., Peretz, I. & Aronoff, N. Time course of melody recognition: A gating paradigm study. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 1019–1028 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194831
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194831