Abstract
Uninformative auditory frequency cues have a facilitatory effect on reaction time and accuracy of detection and intensity discrimination of target tones for cue-target intervals of up to 3 sec (Green & McKeown, 2001; Ward, 1997). Under some conditions, however, this facilitatory effect can reverse to an inhibitory effect at cue-target intervals longer than 450 msec (Mondor, Breau, & Milliken, 1998). The present work demonstrates that such inhibitory effects are not found in target-target experiments (Experiment 1) or in cue-target experiments requiring a go-no-go discrimination of the target (Experiment 2), whereas they do appear in the paradigm used by Mondor et al. (1998, Experiment 3), albeit unaffected by the similarity of cue and target. Thus, the frequency-based inhibitory effects sometimes found in auditory cuing tasks can be distinguished empirically from those characterizing spatial inhibition of return (IOR), which are found in both target-target and go-no-go cue-target paradigms. The present work and functional and neurophysiological arguments all support the position that different mechanisms underlie spatial IOR and the inhibitory effects sometimes found in auditory frequency processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 467–477.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., &Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1467–1475.
Dorris, M. C., Everling, S., Klein, R., &Munoz, D. P. (1998). Neuronal correlates of inhibition of return (IOR): Visual and motor preparatory signals in the monkey superior colliculus.Society for Neuroscience Abstracts,24, 417.
Fuentes, L. J., Vivas, A. B., &Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory mechanisms of attentional networks: Spatial and semantic inhibitory processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1114–1126.
Green, T. J., &McKeown, J. D. (2001). Capture of attention in selective frequency listening.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1197–1210.
Greenberg, G., &Larkin, W. (1968). Frequency-response characteristics of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: The probe-signal method.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,89, 2837–2842.
Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., &Mangun, G. R. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing.Psychological Science,10, 157–161.
Harvey, N. (1980). Non-informative effects of stimuli functioning as cues.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 413–425.
Johnson, D. M., &Hafter, E. R. (1980). Uncertain-frequency detection: Cuing and condition of observation.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 143–149.
Kirby, N. H. (1976). Sequential effects in two-choice reaction time: Automatic facilitation or subjective expectancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 567–577.
Klein, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 138–147.
Klein, R. M., &MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search.Psychological Science,10, 346–352.
Kwak, H.-W., &Egeth, H. (1992). Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 455–464.
Law, M. B., Pratt, J., &Abrams, R. A. (1995). Color-based inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 402–408.
Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M. G., Clark, V. P., &Hawkins, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 887–904.
Lupiáñez, J., Milán, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., &Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1241–1254.
Macmillan, N. A., &Schwartz, M. (1975). A probe-signal investigation of uncertain-frequency detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,58, 1051–1058.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S.M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. (1987). Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space.Neuropsychologia,21, 41–54.
McDonald, J. J. (1996).Stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms in audition: Evidence from an implicit localization task. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of British Columbia.
McDonald, J. J., &Ward, L. M. (1999). Spatial relevance determines facilitatory and inhibitory effects of auditory covert spatial orienting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1234–1252.
McDonald, J. J., & Ward, L. M. (2002).Cross-modal consequences of involuntary spatial attention and inhibition of return. Manuscript submitted for publication.
McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., &Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An event-related brain potential study of inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1411–1423.
Mondor, T. A. (1999). Predictability of the cue-target relation and the time-course of auditory inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1501–1509.
Mondor, T. A., &Breau, L. M. (1999). Facilitative and inhibitory effects of location and frequency cues: Evidence of a modulation in perceptual sensitivity.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 438–444.
Mondor, T. A., Breau, L. M., &Milliken, B. (1998). Inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention: Evidence of location-based and frequency-based inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 296–302.
Mondor, T. A., &Bregman, A. S. (1994). Allocating attention to frequency regions.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 268–276.
Mondor, T. A., &Lacey, T. E. (2001). Facilitative and inhibitory effects of cuing sound duration, intensity, and timbre.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 726–736.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain.Annual Review of Neuroscience,13, 25–42.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211–228.
Pratt, J. (1995). Inhibition of return in a discrimination task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 117–120.
Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., &Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location-and identity-based choice decision tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 964–971.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennen, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Rafal, R. D., &Henik, A. (1994). The neurology of inhibition: Integrating controlled and automatic processes. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 1–51). San Diego: Academic Press.
Rafal, R. D., Posner, M. I., Friedman, J. H., Inhoff, A. W., &Bernstein, E. (1988). Orienting of visual attention in progressive supranuclear palsy.Brain,111, 267–280.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 367–378.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). Auditory cues and inhibition of return: The importance of oculomotor activation.Experimental Brain Research,112, 119–126.
Roder, B., Spence, C., &Rosler, F. (2000). Inhibition of return and oculomotor control in the blind.NeuroReport,11, 3043–3045.
Santee, J. L., &Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 489–501.
Sapir, A., Soroker, N., Berger, A., &Henik, A. (1999). Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation.Nature Neuroscience,2, 1053–1054.
Scharf, B.,Quigely, S., Aoki, C., Peachey, N., &Reeves, A. (1987). Focused auditory attention and frequency selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 215–223.
Schlauch, R. S., &Hafter, E. R. (1991). Listening bandwidths and frequency uncertainty in pure-tone signal detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,90, 1332–1339.
Schmidt, W. C. (1996). “Inhibition of return” without visual input.Neuropsychologia,34, 943–952.
Simion, F., Valenza, E., Umiltá, C., &Dalla Barba, B. (1995). Inhibition of return in newborns is temporo-nasal asymmetrical.Infant Behavior & Development,18, 189–194.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 555–574.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1998a). Auditory and audiovisual inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 125–139.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1998b). Inhibition of return following an auditory cue: The role of central reorienting events.Experimental Brain Research,188, 352–360.
Spence, C., Lloyd, D., McGlone, F., Nicholls, M. E. R., &Driver, J. (2000). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition.Experimental Brain Research,134, 42–48.
Stein, B. E., &Meredith, M. A. (1993).The merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Marzi, C. A., &Berlucchi, G. (1987). Distribution in the visual field of the costs of voluntarily associated attention and of the inhibitory after-effects of covert orienting.Neuropsychologia,25, 55–71.
Tassinari, G., &Berlucchi, G. (1995). Covert orienting to noninformative cues: Reaction time studies.Behavioural Brain Research,71, 101–112.
Tassinari, G., &Campara, D. (1996). Consequences of covert orienting to non-informative stimuli of different modalities: A unitary mechanism?Neuropsychologia,34, 235–245.
Taylor, T. L., &Klien, R. M. (1998a). Inhibition of return to color: A replication and nonextension of Law, Pratt, and Abrams (1995).Perception & Psychophysics,60, 1452–1456.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (1998b). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 625–643.
Tipper, S. P., MacQueen, G. M., &Brehaut, J. C. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 45–52.
Valenza, E., Simion, F., &Umiltá, C. (1994). Inhibition of return in newborn infants.Infant Behavior & Development,17, 293–302.
Ward, L. M. (1997). Involuntary listening aids hearing.Psychological Science,8, 112–118.
Ward, L. M., &Mori, S. (1996). Attention cuing aids auditory intensity resolution.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,100, 1722–1727.
Wright, R. D., &Richard, C. (1996). Inhibition of return at multiple locations in visual space.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 324–327.
Wright, R. D., &Ward, L. M. (1998). The control of visual attention. In R. D. Wright (Ed.),Visual attention (pp. 132–186). New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) operating grant to L.M.W. and by a NSERC Predoctoral Research Fellowship to D.J.P.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prime, D.J., Ward, L.M. Auditory frequency-based inhibition differs from spatial IOR. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 771–784 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194744
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194744