Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate mechanisms underlying attentional capture by color. Previous work has shown that a color singleton is able to summon attention only in the presence of a relevant attentional set, whereas when a color singleton is not useful for a task, evidence for purely stimulus-driven attentional capture is controversial. Three visual search experiments (T-L task) were conducted using a method different from that based on set sizes, consisting of monitoring target-singleton distance in a unique display size. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that attention can be summoned in a real stimulus-driven manner by an irrelevant color singleton. Experiment 2A extended this observation, showing that the color singleton attracted attention even when capture was detrimental. However, Experiment 2B showed that such capture can be strategically prevented. Finally, in Experiment 3, we examined whether such a capture was due to a spatial shift or to a filtering cost, providing evidence supporting the shift hypothesis. Stimulus-driven capture was observed when color was neither the defining nor the reported target attribute (Yantis, 1993) and when subjects naive of visual search tasks were used. The present results give experimental support to many contemporary models of visual attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention.Psychological Review,97, 523–547.
Carr, T. H., &Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic and repetition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center—surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 341–350.
Cave, K. R. (1999). The FeatureGate model of visual selection.Psychological Research,62, 182–194.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Cave, K. R., &Zimmerman, J. M. (1997). Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice.Psychological Science,8, 399–403.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 193–222.
Duncan, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 85–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. E., &Dagenbach, D. (1991). Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: Further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 551–560.
Folk, C. L., &Annett, S. (1994). Do locally defined feature discontinuities capture attention?Perception & Psychophysics,56, 277–287.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R.W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 682–685.
Gibson, B. S., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Surprise! An unexpected color singleton does not capture attention in visual search.Psychological Science,9, 176–182.
Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., &Ross, W. D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object representations.Psychological Review,101, 470–489.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 356–388.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Julesz, B., &Bergen, J.R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures.Bell System Technical Journal,62, 1619–1645.
Koch, C., &Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology,4, 219–227.
Kwak, H.-W., Dagenbach, D., &Egeth, H. E. (1991). Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 473–480.
Martin-Emerson, R., &Kramer, A. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 739–751.
Matthews, P. B. C. (1991). The human stretch reflex and the motor cortex.Trends in Neuroscience,14, 87–91.
Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.
Nothdurft, H. C. (1993). Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search.Vision Research,33, 839–844.
O’Regan, J.K., Rensink, R.A., &Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes.”Nature,398, 34.
Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 307–318.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V (pp. 669–682). New York: Academic Press.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm.Visual Cognition,7, 377–396.
Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 261–267.
Spence, C., &Driver, J. (1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 555–574.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J., &Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1342–1353.
Todd, S., &Kramer, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 198–210.
Treisman, A. M., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Turatto, M., &Galfano, G. (2000). Color, form and luminanace capture attention in visual search.Vision Research,40, 1639–1643.
Ungerleider, L. G., &Haxby, J. V. (1994). “What” and “where” in the human brain.Current Opinion in Neurobiology,4, 157–165.
Walley, R. E., &Weiden, T. D. (1973). Lateral inhibition and cognitive masking: A neuropsychological theory of attention.Psychological Review,80, 284–302.
Warner, C. B., Juola, J. F., &Koshino, H. (1990). Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,48, 243–251.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Extending guided search: Why guided search needs a preattentive “item map.” In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.),Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 247–270). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.),Attention (pp. 13–73). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 676–681.
Yantis, S., &Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 812–825.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onset and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Yantis S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onset and selective attention: Voluntary vs. automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by grants brom CNR and MURST.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turatto, M., Galfano, G. Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 286–297 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194469
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194469