Abstract
Although inhibition of return (IOR) is widely believed to aid search by discouraging reexamination of previously inspected locations, its impact actually appears to decline as the number of target locations increases. We test three possible reasons for this paradoxical result: (1) IOR is capacity-limited, (2) IOR is sensitive to subtle changes in target location probability, and (3) IOR decays with distance from a previously attended location. The present investigation provides strong support for the third explanation, indicating that a gradient of inhibition is centered on previously attended locations. We note that this inhibitory gradient resolves a paradox in the literature. Moreover, we speculate that the inhibitory gradient may reflect a “similarity space” within which target locations near to the cue are tagged with inhibition due to their similarity to the cued location. The farther the target location is away, the less similar it is to the cued location, and thus the less inhibition it receives.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Birmingham, E., &Pratt, J. (2005). Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm.Acta Psychologica,118, 101–121.
Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., Chasteen, A. L., &Scialfa, C. T. (2005). Examining task difficulty and the time course of inhibition of return: Detecting perceptually degraded targets.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 90–98.
Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., &Craik, F. I. M. (2003). The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 970–981.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., &Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1467–1475.
Gibson, B. S., &Egeth, H. (1994). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 323–339.
Klein, R. [M.] (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M., &MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search.Psychological Science,10, 346–352.
Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., &Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 753–773.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Milliken, B., Lupiáñez, J., Roberts, M., &Stevanovski, B. (2003). Orienting in space and time: Joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 877–883.
Mondor, T. A. (1999). Predictability of the cue-target relation and the time-course of auditory inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1501–1509.
Paul, M. A., &Tipper, S. P. (2003). Object-based representations facilitate memory for inhibitory processes.Experimental Brain Research,148, 283–289.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211–228.
Pratt, J., Adam, J., &McAuliffe, J. (1998). The spatial relationship between cues and targets mediates inhibition of return.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,52, 213–216.
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jha, A. P., &Rosenquist, J. N. (1996). What is inhibited in inhibition of return.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 367–378.
Sapir, A., Soroker, N., Berger, A., &Henik, A. (1999). Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation.Nature Neuroscience,2, 1053–1054.
Snyder, J. J., &Kingstone, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited?Perception & Psychophysics,62, 452–458.
Snyder, J. J., & Kingstone, A. (in press). Inhibition of return at multiple locations and its impact on visual search.Visual Cognition.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birmingham, E., Visser, T.A.W., Snyder, J.J. et al. Inhibition of return: Unraveling a paradox. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 957–963 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194128
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194128