Abstract
Recent studies have shown the existence of two qualitatively distinct groups of people based on how they judge the probability of a conditional statement. The present study was designed to test whether these differences are rooted in distinctive means of processing conditional statements and whether they are linked to differences in general intelligence. In the study, each of 120 participants completed three separate cognitive tasks involving the processing of abstract conditional statements—the probability-of-conditionals task, the conditional truth table task, and the conditional inference task—in addition to completing a test of general intelligence (AH4). The results showed a number of predicted effects: People responding with conditional (rather than conjunctive) probabilities on the first task were higher in cognitive ability, showed reasoning patterns more consistent with a suppositional treatment of the conditional, and showed a strongly “defective” truth table pattern. The results include several novel findings and post challenges to contemporary psychological theories of conditionals.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, J. (2003).A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braine, M. D. S., &O’Brien, D. P. (1991). A theory ofIf: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles.Psychological Review,98, 182–203.
Braine, M. D. S., &O’Brien, D. P. (1998). The theory of mental-propositional logic: Description and illustration. In M. D. S. Braine & D. P. O’Brien (Eds.),Mental logic (pp. 79–89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Juan-Espinosa, M., &Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted byg.Intelligence,32, 277–296.
Edgington, D. (1995). On conditionals.Mind,104, 235–329.
Edgington, D. (2003). What if? Questions about conditionals.Mind & Language,18, 380–401.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1998). Matching bias in conditional reasoning: Do we understand it after 25 years?Thinking & Reasoning,4, 45–82.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (2007).Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Clibbens, J., &Rood, B. (1995). Bias in conditional inference: Implications for mental models and mental logic.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,48A, 644–670.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Clibbens, J., &Rood, B. (1996). The role of implicit and explicit negation in conditional reasoning bias.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 392–409.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Ellis, C. E., &Newstead, S. E. (1996). On the mental representation of conditional sentences.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 1086–1114.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., Hadjichristidis, C., Thompson, V., Over, D. E., &Bennett, S. (2007). On the basis of belief in causal and diagnostic conditionals.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,60, 635–643.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., &Over, D. E. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 321–355.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1993).Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Evans, J. St. B. T., &Over, D. E. (2004).If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Over, D. E., &Handley, S. J. (2005). Supposition, extensionality and conditionals: A critique of Johnson-Laird & Byrne (2002).Psychological Review,112, 1040–1052.
Girotto, V., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). The probability of conditionals.Psychologia,47, 207–225.
Hadjichristidis, C., Stevenson, R. J., Over, D. E., Sloman, S. A., Evans, J. St. B. T., &Feeney, A. (2001). On the evaluation ofIf p then q conditionals. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.),Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 409–414). London: Erlbaum.
Handley, S., Evans, J. St. B. T., &Thompson, V. A. (2006). The negated conditional: A litmus test for the suppositional conditional?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,32, 559–569.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).Deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics and inference.Psychological Review,109, 646–678.
Klaczynski, P. A., &Daniel, D. B. (2005). Individual differences in conditional reasoning: A dual-process account.Thinking & Reasoning,11, 305–325.
Kyllonen, P., &Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?!Intelligence,14, 389–433.
Marcus, S. L., &Rips, L. J. (1979). Conditional reasoning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 199–233.
Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J., Harley, C., Wright, H., &Farelly, D. (2004). Individual differences in deductive reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 33–60.
Oaksford, M., &Chater, N. (2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,5, 349–357.
Oberauer, K., Geiger, S. M., Fischer, K., &Weidenfeld, A. (2007). Two meanings of “If ”: Individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,60, 790–819.
Oberauer, K., &Wilhelm, O. (2003). The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models and personal utilities.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 680–693.
Over, D. E., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., &Sloman, S. A. (2007). The probability of causal conditionals.Cognitive Psychology,54, 62–97.
Ramsey, F. P. (1931).The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rips, L. J., &Marcus, S. L. (1977). Suppositions and the analysis of conditional sentences. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 185–219). New York: Wiley.
Schroyens, W., & Schaeken, W. (2004). Guilt by association: On iffy propositions and the proper treatment of mental models theory.Current Psychology Letters,12. Available at cpl.revues.ord/document411 .html.
Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., &d’Ydewalle, G. (2001). The processing of negations in conditional reasoning: A meta-analytic study in mental models and/or mental logic theory.Thinking & Reasoning,7, 121–172.
Sperber, D., Cara, F., &Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task.Cognition,57, 31–95.
Stanovich, K. E. (1999).Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stanovich, K. E., &West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral & Brain Sciences,23, 645–726.
Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.),New horizons in psychology I (pp. 106–137). Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Project Grant RES-000-23-0722 from the Economic and Social Research Council of the United Kingdom.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, J.S.B.T., Handley, S.J., Neilens, H. et al. Thinking about conditionals: A study of individual differences. Memory & Cognition 35, 1772–1784 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193509
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193509