Trichobezoar is a rare intriguing disorder in which swallowed hairs accumulates in the stomach. Being indigestible and slippery, it could not be propulsed and becomes entrapped within the stomach. Large amounts can thus accumulate over the years forming a hair ball. Rapunzel syndrome is a variant where hair accumulation reaches the small gut and beyond in some cases. Although the syndrome has been known for many years, only 24 cases have been reported in the literature and the discovery of a new case is always surprising. In this report, we present two cases discovered within a period of three months. One of them was pregnant and had small bowel intussusception and perforation, a very rare combination. We hereby add two more cases to the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first report on two cases of Rapunzel syndrome, the diagnosis of which demands a high index of suspicion.

Reported in the 18th century[1], trichobezoar is a com-bination of “trich” meaning hair in Greek and “bezoar” meaning poison antidote in Arabic or Persian[2]. The habitual swallowing of hairs over the years leads to the formation of a hair ball in the stomach. Extension of hairs beyond the stomach into the small bowel in the form of a tail has been termed Rapunzel syndrome[3], after Rapunzel, the heroine of a German fairy tale[4].

Trichobezoar was first reported in 1779 by Baudamant[1]. The word is a combination of “trich” and “bezoar”, with the former meaning hair in Greek, and the later meaning poison antidote in Arabic or Persian[2]. By necessity, trichotillomania (plucking of hairs) and trichophagia (swallowing of hairs) are the leading events.

Rapunzel syndrome, described first by Vaughan and colleagues in 1968[3], is an extension of the gastric trichobezoar into the small gut in the form of a long tail. It is named after Rapunzel, the heroine of a German fairy tale by the Grimm brothers. She used to let her long golden hair tress down the tower where she was imprisoned, to allow her prince lover to climb up.

The syndrome has been rarely reported. In their report in 1999, Dalshaug and colleagues found only 11 cases[4], whereas in a recent search in 2007, only 24 cases were retrieved from the literature[5].

The reason why hair collects in the stomach is not fully understood. Debakey and Oschner suggested that hair entrapment in the gastric folds is the initiating event[6]. Due to its indigestibility, resilience and slippery nature, it becomes entrapped within the mucosal folds where it gets enmeshed, and acquires more hairs and thus a larger size.

The clinical picture ranges from abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, early satiety and weight loss, to bleeding ulcer, intestinal obstruction and perforation. Intussusception has also been reported[4].

Although a psychiatric trouble is usually present[7], this is not always the case as the syndrome may affect healthy women[8]. In the first case reported here, the patient had a history of pica, which should be an alarming sign, mandating behavioural or psychiatric intervention. In the second case, although the patient denied any psychiatric troubles or social strains, on careful enquiry, her husband revealed that she had the habit of putting hair in her mouth while thinking.

Anaemia and hypoalbuminaemia associated with chronic gastritis usually go unnoticed until the case is brought to light by the onset of severer complications such as hemorrhage, enteric or pancreatic or biliary obstruction. The onset of perforation and peritonitis is largely responsible for an attendant mortality of about 30%[9]. In the second case, it was evident that intestinal perforation was a very recent onset as the patient showed no relevant signs on initial evaluation.

Trichobezoar affects young females almost exclusively[9] and it has been previously reported during pregnancy[10]. The presence of pregnancy may complicate the management, and foetal loss, as occurred in our second patient, is always a possibility. Provided there is no eminent danger, it might be wise to postpone intervention till the patient delivers.

As mentioned in the classic series of Debakey et al[6], an upper abdominal mass remains the commonest presenting sign. In our cases, an upper abdominal mass was easily visible due to its large size and the cachectic habitus of the patients.

Diagnostic modalities include US, CT scan and upper endoscopy. CT scan has a high accuracy rate, but the accuracy of US in such cases is not so high[12]. On CT scan, a well-circumscribed lesion, composed of concentric whorls of different densities with pockets of air enmeshed within it, appears in the region of stomach. Oral contrast fills the more peripheral interstices of the lesion and a thin band of contrast circumscribes it. Absence of significant post intravenous contrast enhancement precludes a neoplastic lesion[13]. In our second case, US failed to give the correct diagnosis, and as CT scan was not an option due to the presence of pregnancy, upper endoscopy was needed to reach the diagnosis. Endoscopy has also been reported to have a therapeutic potential[11]. It is probable that US is not the modality of choice in such conditions[1112].

Laparoscopy may be successful in extracting the hair ball[1014]. In our cases, this would not be an easy undertaking due to the young age of the first case and the presence of intussusception and pregnancy in the second. Other minimally invasive modalities like extracorporeal lithotripter, endoscopic lithotripter, and laser fragmentation[9] are emerging. Their role and success rates need to be defined and open surgery remains the gold standard.

In conclusion, surgeons, physicians, and radiologists should consider trichobezoar in the differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal obstruction in young females, especially in the presence of an upper abdominal mass. Timely diagnosis and treatment are of utmost importance to avoid a possible fatal outcome. As recurrences are known, each patient should have a proper psychiatric evaluation and follow-up.