SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número2Nematodos gastrointestinales en ovinos y su resistencia antihelmíntica. Un tema en discusión dé MéxicoAnálisis crítico de las definiciones de reservorio y portador en epidemiología índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Journal of the Selva Andina Animal Science

versión impresa ISSN 2311-3766versión On-line ISSN 2311-2581

J.Selva Andina Anim. Sci. vol.10 no.2 La Paz  2023  Epub 01-Oct-2023

https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsaas.2023.100200130 

Artículo de Revisión

Moniezia expansa and Moniezia benedeni a parasitosis in ruminants: an overview of their taxonomical aspects

María Génesis Almeida-Caicedo1  * 
http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8945-7738

Roberto Ismael Almeida Secaira1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4893-959X

Oscar Patricio Nuñez Torres1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9593-5850

Bryon Enrique Borja-Caicedo1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6659-8557

1Technical University of Ambato. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Querochaca Campus. Via Cevallos-Quero, Cevallos. Province of Tungurahua, Ecuador. Los Chasquis Avenue and Guayllabamba River. Tel: +032 523039 ext. 521021. Ambato, Ecuador.


Resumen

Las especies de Moniezia son un grupo de parásitos con distribución mundial que causan enfermedades intestinales en especies rumiantes caracterizados por la disminución de la producción animal y, en algunos casos, la muerte del hospedero. Se hizo una revisión bibliográfica sistemática bajo un enfoque cualitativo de diseño narrativo y alcance descriptivo sobre una visión general de la importancia de Moniezia expansa y Moniezia benedeni, así como algunos aspectos vinculados a su taxonomía, las 2 principales especies responsables de infecciones gastrointestinales en rumiantes. Para la búsqueda fueron consultadas las principales bases de datos incluidas Scopus, Web of Science, Taylor & Francis, PubMed, Latindex, SciELO, Dialnet, entre otras, utilizando el operador lógico booleano. De acuerdo con la revisión, los parásitos gastrointestinales constituyen una de las principales amenazas que limitan el desarrollo y rentabilidad de la industria ganadera en zonas tropicales y subtropicales. Entre los agentes causales de enfermedades gastrointestinales, la monieziosis, causada por Moniezia spp., constituye una patología de mayor frecuencia de ocurrencia entre diferentes especies de ganado. Existen limitaciones en la identificación de M. expansa y M. benedeni cuando se usan solo caracteres morfológicos, por lo que las técnicas moleculares tienen su potencial para superar los problemas de identificación de estas y otras especies del género. Los aportes de la biología molecular resultan de utilidad no solo para inferir sobre las relaciones filogenéticas entre los cestodos, sino también para identificar marcadores moleculares para futuros estudios sobre diagnóstico, genética de poblaciones y ecología molecular en especies de Moniezia. Sin embargo, se requiere un mayor número de estudios sobre marcadores genéticos para identificar con precisión las especies de Moniezia y ser base para investigaciones taxonómicas.

Palabras clave: Cestodos; enfermedades gastrointestinales; identificación morfológica; parásitos; técnicas moleculares; producción pecuaria

Abstract

Moniezia species are a group of globally distributed parasites that cause intestinal diseases in ruminant species characterized by decreased animal production and, in some cases, death of the host. A systematic literature review was conducted under a qualitative approach of narrative design and descriptive scope on an overview of the importance of Moniezia expansa and Moniezia benedeni, as well as some aspects related to their taxonomy, the 2 main species responsible for gastrointestinal infections in ruminants. For the search, the main databases were consulted, including Scopus, Web of Science, Taylor & Francis, PubMed, Latindex, SciELO, Dialnet, among others, using the Boolean logical operator. According to the review, gastrointestinal parasites constitute one of the main threats limiting the development and profitability of the livestock industry in tropical and subtropical areas. Among the causative agents of gastrointestinal diseases, monieziosis, caused by Moniezia spp., is a pathology with the highest frequency of occurrence among different livestock species. There are limitations in the identification of M. expansa and M. benedeni when only morphological characters are used, so molecular techniques have the potential to overcome the problems of identification of these and other species of the genus. The contributions of molecular biology are useful not only for inferring phylogenetic relationships among cestodes, but also for identifying molecular markers for future studies on diagnostics, population genetics and molecular ecology in Moniezia species. However, more genetic marker studies are required to accurately identify Moniezia species and to provide a basis for taxonomic investigations.

Keywords: Cestodes; gastrointestinal diseases; morphological identification; parasites; molecular techniques; livestock production

Introduction

Production animals generally harbor a series of parasites in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, particularly helminths, causing clinical or subclinical parasitism, negatively affecting their health status, causing enormous economic losses to the livestock industry, and also affecting productive performance and reproductive of livestock1. Helminths are endoparasites classified into 2 main groups: nematodes (roundworms) and platyhelminths (flatworms), the latter are subdivided into trematodes (trematodes) and cestodes (tapeworms) that can exhibit complex life cycles involving one or more intermediate hosts that house juvenile stages and a definitive host where the sexually mature parasites are found2.

The genus Moniezia belongs to the family Anoplocephalidae in the Order Cyclophyllidea, characterized by the absence of hooks and rostellum, its body consists of a small anterior scolex, neck, followed by a long chain strobile with a specific pattern for each species3. Moniezia species are included in cestodes and they show a worldwide distribution; causing intestinal diseases in ruminant species characterized by a decrease in animal production and, in some cases, death4.

Since the description of the genus by Blanchard in 1891, 11 species were included, but later 6 species were added; however, regardless of the number of species recorded, Moniezia benedeni (Moniez, 1879) and Moniezia expansa (Rudolphi, 1810) remain the 2 most important species, with prevalence levels ranging from 1 to 21 % in various geographic regions or different seasons of the same regions5.

M. expansa is commonly located in the small intestine of cattle, sheep, goats, deer, among others, however, frequently mature animals do not generally present clinical symptoms, while young animals are more susceptible and develop soft feces, which then become diarrheal accompanied by mucus, segments of the parasite and can suffer intestinal obstruction, intestinal torsion and even intestinal rupture6. M. benedeni primarily a livestock parasite, like M. expan-sa, occur more frequently in animals less than 6 to 8 months old, while older animals tend to be less susceptible; after 2 years, they rarely have more than one or a few worms7.

This article presents a review on the importance of M. expansa and M. benedeni as gastrointestinal parasites (GIP) in ruminants, and also presents a discussion on the taxonomic problems in both species with the contributions that molecular biology has had to elucidate the identification confusions of both species.

Materials and methods

The present article was based on a systematic bibliographic review on the current information on M. expansa and M. benedeni in GI infections in ruminants, it was approached under a qualitative approach of narrative design and descriptive scope8. According to Cesário et al.9, the bibliographic review is a type of research based on already constructed material, such as monographs or articles published in scientific journals.

For the search, the main scientific databases were consulted, including Scopus, Web of Science, Taylor & Francis, PubMed, Latindex, SciELO, Dialnet, among others, using the Boolean logical operator “AND” and “OR”. The criteria for selecting the articles to be analyzed included those publications that contain the following key words in Spanish: GI diseases, M. benedeni, M. expansa, moneziosis, taeniasis of ruminants, ruminants with their equivalents in Spanish and Portuguese. In the first search, 390 articles were obtained, of which 27 articles were selected, which were analyzed for the review. For this selection, only open access articles were taken into account, related to topics related to the species M. expansa and M. benedeni, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish.

In addition, a restriction was made in the search for scientific articles to the last 5 years in order to carry out the analysis of the most up-to-date information on the current status of M. expansa and M. benedeni in GI infections in ruminants.

Finally, the review followed the inclusion, selection, identification and review criteria Figure 1.

Figure 1 Flowchart for the selection of articles included in the review 

Development

GI diseases in ruminants. In general, livestock can be affected by different types of parasites that include species of nematodes, trematodes, cestodes and coccidia. Zooparasitic helminths lodge in their digestive tract, are usually associated with subclinical infections and can occasionally cause direct mortality in affected animals10. In tropical and subtropical areas, GIP are one of the main threats that limit the development and profitability of the livestock industry11.

These types of GIP cause a significant impact on the health of production animals, causing a reduction in the rate of growth, reproduction, milk/meat production and, ultimately, death, causing considerable economic losses12. According to Charlier et al.13, the decrease in productivity is due to the fact that helminths cause alterations in metabolic functions, resulting in a low level of utilization and assimilation of food and consequently results in delayed growth, weight gain, malnutrition, decreased appetite, loss of body weight, emaciation, and increased susceptibility to other pathogens.

Even though parasitic diseases represent an important challenge in livestock farms worldwide, knowledge about the epidemiology of GIP is still limited, mainly in low-income countries10. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the morbidity of diseases caused by GIP, both in production and domestic animals, to establish strategies that ensure welfare and management.

Moniezia species and their impact on livestock farming worldwide. Causative agents of the disease known as monieziasis, characterized by the ability to produce a gastrointestinal disorder in ruminants, which is generally considered to have mild pathogenicity, especially in adult cattle, the effects on calves and lambs can cause significant economic losses3.

Moniezia spp., infections have become a major concern in the livestock industry, although the damage caused by cestodes is generally minor compared to the damage caused by gastrointestinal nematodes, the former has shown that they are capable of causing significant economic losses. worldwide in some types of livestock such as buffaloes and sheep14.

Moniezia have been described, however, given that identification at the species level has been based on the use of morphological characters, its taxonomy is currently quite controversial and there are authors who recognize up to 17 species3,15. On the other hand, there is only information on genetic sequencing for the 3 main species; M. expansa, M. benedeni and M. monardi16. In that sense, morphologically, the differentiation between M. expansa and M. benedeni is based on the shape of the interproglottid glands, which have a rosette pattern in M. expansa, while in M. benedeni it has a short and continuous linear pattern3. However, this characteristic is difficult to observe in some specimens, making them not morphologically distinguishable5, which is why other biochemical and molecular techniques have been developed for the differentiation of these 2 species. Additionally, in Australia the existence of cryptic species in M. benedeni has been pointed out through multilocus enzyme electrophoresis15,17, which highlights the need to investigate genetic variation between geographical populations for the establishment of an accurate identification, as well as for re-evaluation of conventional taxonomy.

M. benedeni and M. expansa. Moniezia spp., infections are included among those that affect the small intestine in sheep and goats, although it also includes a wide range of definitive hosts, including cattle and other wild ruminants, with M. expansa being the most important species due to its high frequency of occurrence in sheep and goats compared to other ruminants4.

Moniezia species have an indirect biological cycle, in which 2 host species are required, including ruminants as definitive or final host, where occurs sexual reproduction and the eggs produced pass from the intestine of the ruminant into the gravid proglottids and are expulsed through the feces to the soil where they penetrate the oribatid mites that become intermediate hosts (where asexual reproduction occurs)18.

M. benedeni are widely distributed parasites and are commonly associated with wild and domestic ruminants, although they are generally considered to be of low pathogenicity, because the host does not present specific or serious symptoms, however, a decrease in the growth rate has been observed. in infected animals, therefore, with a reduced value at the time of sale19. In one study, the prevalence of M. benedeni in European bison from 3 months to 26 years of age in a primeval forest in Białowieża, infection was reported to be 42.3 %, with infection intensity ranging from 2 to 25 tapeworms (average 5.8 specimens), being higher in calves (50 %) than in adult bison (33.3 %)20. According to the authors, the high prevalence of this parasitosis in European bison could be due to poor condition or weak immunity of infected animals.

Although it is uncommon, coinfections of M. benedeni and M. expansa have been verified. In this sense, in Romania Iacob et al.21 reported that Carpathian goat kids (aged 6 to 8 months) with acute digestive syndrome presented infection with both species, 56.1 % corresponded to M. expansa, 43.9 % M. benedeni, with a mean infection intensity of 7.5 M. expansa per animal, compared to 4.5 M. benedeni per animal. Infection with both species caused severe pathological lesions in the small intestine such as occlusion, intestinal obstruction, total intestinal villous atrophy and ulcerations.

Therefore, research has indicated that even when the pathogenicity is low, it is necessary to apply control, such as the use of praziquantel at doses of 3.75 and 5.0 mg kg-1, which can be effective for the complete deworming of sheep and goats, respectively, but there is no information on the optimal dose for the control of M. benedeni in cattle19. In Bolivia, praziquantel was applied in combination with albendazole resulting in 100 % efficacy and even a high level of control was observed with the use of albendazole. On the other hand, the use of Fenbendazole caused a 60 and 75 % reduction in infections with M. expansa and M. benedeni, while albendazole also achieved a 75 and 95 % reduction in oviposition in M. expansa and M. benedeni, respectively, although the authors do not specify the administered dose of Fenbendazole and albendazole22.

The taxonomic problem in some species within the genus Moniezia. The taxonomy of this genus has been based mainly on morphological characters, making the status of the species uncertain. Taxonomic confusion could be derived from the fact that the description of the species has been based on a limited number of morphological characteristics that are often convergent, which generates controversy about the taxonomy of the genus3,16. In this sense, there have been confusions and errors in the identification of the 2 main species of Moniezia, M. expansa and M. benedeni, which have been differentiated based on the shape of their interproglottid glands and eggs3,16. M. expansa has a short continuous linear pattern of interproglottid glands, while M. benedeni has a row of small circular patterns on the interproglottid glands. Regarding the eggs, these have a triangular shape in M. expansa and a tetragonal shape in M. benedeni23. However, there are problems in identification when specimens lack interproglottid glands or when the eggs have an altered shape3,16. Additionally, the morphological recognition of these species is also based on features related to the scolex, neck and strobile and the presence of transparent anterior, posterior, mature and gravid segments15.

Furthermore, Chilton et al.14 pointed out, through the use of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis techniques, the existence of cryptic species in M. benedeni, which highlights the limitations of identifying Moniezia species solely based on morphological characters. On the other hand, the use of molecular techniques to elucidate the DNA sequence (ITS1 and 5.8S) have been used to distinguish these 2 species16,25. According to Chilton et al.24, a greater num-ber of genetic markers must be developed to accura-tely identify Moniezia species and serve as a basis for taxonomic investigations.

Also, ribosomal ITS2 is considered a very useful marker for establishing relationships between helminth species26. Yan et al.5 amplified and sequenced the 18S rDNA regions of M. benedeni and M. expansa for precise species identification, obtaining that the lengths and GC contents of the sequenced regions were 2476-2487 bp and 51.9-52.1 % for M. benedeni and 2473 bp and 51.9-52.0 % for M. expansa, respectively, in addition the alignment and comparison of the 18S sequences in both species revealed a homology of 92.5 to 93.3 %. Finally, the results suggest no matches in the 18S regions of M. benedeni and M. expansa with other species using the BLAST search, suggesting that the 18S sequences are appropriate markers for the design of distinctive primers for the 2 species of Moniezia.

Similarly, Gao et al.27 characterized, for the first time, the complete mitochondrial genome of M. sichuanensis and noted that the total length of the circular genome was 13652 bp, which consisted of 12 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA genes, and 2 ribosomal RNA genes, which are typical of Moniezia mitochondrial genomes.

Additionally, an increasing number of complete mitochondrial (mt) genome sequences provides the opportunity to optimize the selection of molecular markers for studies in ecology, evolutionary biology, and population genetics23. Complete mt genomes provide individual markers with different levels of sequence variation, as well as combined mtDNA molecular markers for intra-and interspecies studies27.

In conclusion, phylogenetic analysis using the concatenated amino acid sequences suggests that M. benedeni and M. expansa represent close but distinct taxa and, furthermore, the data support the view of the existence of cryptic species in M. benedeni and M. expansa. According to Guo23 the complete mt genomes of these 2 species will be useful not only to infer phylogenetic relationships between cestodes, but also to identify suitable molecular markers for future studies on diagnosis, population genetics and molecular ecology in Moniezia species.

Conclusion

Among GIP species, Moniezia species, causal agents of the disease known as monieziasis, occur most frequently in cattle, sheep and goats, being characterized by the presence of a gastrointestinal disorder in the host and, although they generally produce symptoms with mild pathogenicity, especially in adult cattle, the effects on calves and lambs can cause significant economic losses.

The taxonomy of the genus Moniezia has been based mainly on morphological characters, making the status of the species uncertain, and consequently the exact number of species in the genus is not known. Concomitantly, errors have been made in the identification of the 2 main species of Moniezia, M. expansa and M. benedeni, which have been differentiated based on the shape of their interproglottid glands and eggs. Therefore, the use of molecular techniques has served as a basis to distinguish these two species; however, it is necessary to obtain a greater number of genetic markers to accurately identify Moniezia species and serve as a basis for taxonomic research. Finally, the correct identification of parasite species associated with production animals is a crucial step in establishing management strategies for infections in livestock, so the present review presents relevant information that contributes to the elucidation of the taxonomic problems among Moniezia species.

REFERENCES

1. Yonas GH, Meron D, Solomon ME. Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites and identification of major nematodes of cattle in and around Bishoftu, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. J Vet Med Anim Heal 2018;10(7):165-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JVMAH2018.0690. [ Links ]

2. Littlewood DTJ, Bray RA, Waeschenbach A. Phylogenetic patterns of diversity in cestodes and trematodes. In: Morand S, Krasnov BR, Little-wood DTJ, editors. Parasite Diversity and Diversification: Evolutionary Ecology Meets Phylogenetics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 304-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139794749.020. [ Links ]

3. Diop G, Yanagida T, Hailemariam Z, Menkir S, Nakao M, Sako Y, et al. Genetic characterization of Moniezia species in Senegal and Ethiopia. Parasitol Int 2015;64(5):256-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2015.02.008. [ Links ]

4. Sray AHK, Faraj AA. Morphological identification and phylogenetic analysis of Moniezia species isolated from sheep in Wasit province/Iraq. Int J Health Sci 2022;6(S3):10092-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS3.9386. [ Links ]

5. Yan H, Bo X, Liu Y, Lou Z, Ni X, Shi W, et al. Differential diagnosis of Moniezia benedeni and M. expansa (Anoplocephalidae) by PCR using markers in small ribosomal DNA (18S rDNA). Acta Vet Hung 2013;61(4):463-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AVet.2013.035. [ Links ]

6. Liu Y, Wang Z, Pang S, Zhao W, Kang L, Zhang Y, et al. Evaluation of dynamic developmental processes and the molecular basis of the high body fat percentage of different proglottid types of Moniezia expansa. Parasit Vectors 2019;12(1): 390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3650-1. [ Links ]

7. Mullen GR, O'Connor BM. Mites (Acari). In: Mullen GR, Durden LA, editors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2019. p. 533-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814043-7.00026-1. [ Links ]

8. Sánchez Maream J, Fernández M, Diaz JC. Técnicas e instrumentos de recolección de información: análisis y procesamiento realizado por el investigador cualitativo. RCUISRAEL 2021;8(1):107-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35290/rcui.v8n1.2021.400. [ Links ]

9. Cesário JMS, Flauzino VHP, Mejia JVC. Metodologia científica: Principais tipos de pesquisas e suas caraterísticas. Núcl Conhecimento 2020;5(11):23-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32749/nucleodoconhecimento.com.br/educacao/tipos-de-pesquisas. [ Links ]

10. Terfa W, Kumsa B, Ayana D, Maurizio A, Tessarin C, Cassini R. Epidemiology of gastro-intestinal parasites of cattle in three districts in Central Ethiopia. Animals 2023;13(2):285: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020285. [ Links ]

11. Sazmand A, Bahari A, Papi S, Otranto D. Parasitic diseases of equids in Iran (1931-2020): a literature review. Parasit Vectors 2020;13(1):586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04472-w. [ Links ]

12. Hatam-Nahavandi K, Carmena D, Rezaeian M, Mirjalali H, Rahimi HM, Badri M, et al. Gastrointestinal Parasites of Domestic Mammalian Hosts in Southeastern Iran. Vet Sci 2023;10(4):261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10040261. [ Links ]

13. Charlier J, van der Voort M, Kenyon F, Skuce P, Vercruysse J. Chasing helminths and their economic impact on farmed ruminants. Trends Parasitol 2014;30(7):361-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2014.04.009. [ Links ]

14. Zainalabidin FA, Raimy N, Hanifah AL, Sathayah G, Marcel D, Musbah A, et al. Monieziasis in domestic ruminants in Perak, Malaysia. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 2021;43(1):218-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14456/sjst-psu.2021.28. [ Links ]

15. Ali MJ, Abd Alfatlawi MA, Karawan AC. Molecular identification and phylogenetic-tree analysis of Moniezia species from sheep in Al-Diwaniyah city. Bull Iraq Nat Hist Mus 2018;15 (2):131-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26842/binhm.7.2018.15.2.0131. [ Links ]

16. Ohtori M, Aoki M, Itagaki T. Sequence differences in the internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8s ribosomal RNA among three Moniezia species isolated from ruminants in Japan. J Vet Med Sci 2015;77(1):105-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.14-0309. [ Links ]

17. Hassanein HA, Elsayed AN, Abdelaal M, Abdel-Aziz A. Morphological and molecular characterization based on ITS-2 of Moniezia expansa Rudolphi, 1810 (Anoplocephalidae) isolated from the intestine of sheep, Ovis aries (Bovidae) from Egypt. Egypt Acad J Biol Sci E Med Entomol Parasitol 2022;14(2):159-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/EAJBSE.2022.272456. [ Links ]

18. Regassa A, Awol N, Hadush B, Tsegaye Y, Sori T. Internal and external parasites of camels (Camelus dromedarius) slaughtered at Addis Ababa Abattoir, Ethiopia. J Vet Med Anim Heal 2015;6(7):57-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JVMAH2014.0346. [ Links ]

19. Irie T, Sakaguchi K, Ota-Tomita A, Tanida M, Hidaka K, Kirino Y, et al. Continuous Moniezia benedeni infection in confined cattle possibly maintained by an intermediate host on the farm. J Vet Med Sci 2013;75(12):1585-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.13-0250. [ Links ]

20. Demiaszkiewicz AW, Pyziel AM, Lachowicz J, Filip-Hutsch K. Occurrence of tapeworms Moniezia benedeni (Moniez, 1879) in European bison Bison bonasus L. in Bialowieza Primeval Forest. Ann Parasitol 2020;66(1):107-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17420/ap6601.244. [ Links ]

21. Iacob OC, El-Deeb WM, Pasca SA, Turtoi AI. Uncommon co-infection due to Moniezia expansa and Moniezia benedeni in young goats from Romania: morphological and histopathological analysis. Ann Parasitol 2020;66(4):501-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17420/ap6604.291. [ Links ]

22. Guo A. Moniezia benedeni and Moniezia expansa are distinct cestode species based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Acta Trop 2017;166:287-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.11.032. [ Links ]

23. Chilton NB, O'Callaghan MG, Beveridge I, Andrews RH. Genetic markers to distinguish Moniezia expansa from M. benedeni (Cestoda: Anoplocephalidae) and evidence of the existence of cryptic species in Australia. Parasitol Res 2007;100(6):1187-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-006-0388-4. [ Links ]

24. Nguyen TD, Le QD, Huynh VV, Nguyen ST, Nguyen TV, Vu-Khac H. The development of PCR methodology for the identification of species of the tapeworm Moniezia from cattle, goats and sheep in central Vietnam. J Helminthol 2012;86 (4):426-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X11000629. [ Links ]

25. Ando K, Tsunemori M, Akahane H, Tesana S, Hasegawa H, Chinzei Y. Comparative study on DNA sequences of ribosomal DNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 of mitochondrial DNA among five species of gnathostomes. J Helminthol 2006;80(1):7-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/joh2005315. [ Links ]

26. Gao Y, Yan L, Qiu D, Huang Z, Hu D, Zhang D. First mitogenome of Moniezia sichuanensis from forest musk deer with comparative analyses within cyclophyllidea. Vet Parasitol 2021;299:109575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2021.109575. [ Links ]

27. Zarowiecki MZ, Huyse T, Littlewood DTJ. Making the most of mitochondrial genomes - markers for phylogeny, molecular ecology and barcodes in Schistosoma (Platyhelminthes: Digenea). Int J Parasitol 2007;37(12):1401-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.04.014. [ Links ]

Source of financing The authors declare that they did not receive specific funding for this article.

Conflicts of interest There is no conflict of interest in this investigation.

Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the Universidad Técnica de Ambato for their support in the preparation of this article.

Ethical considerations The authors declare that the writing of the article was developed carefully using previous studies in the literature and acknowledge them through the respective authors and sources cited.

Authors' contribution to the articleMaría Génesis Almeida-Caicedo, Roberto Ismael Almeida Secaira, Oscar Patricio Nuñez Torres and Bryon Enrique Borja Caicedo, contributed with the conception and design of the study, search for information, discussion of results, drafting of the manuscript, approval of the final version of the manuscript.

Research limitations The authors point out that there were no limitations in the present research work.

Article ID: 134/JSAAS/2023

Editor's Note: Journal of the Selva Andina Animal Science (JSAAS). All statements expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, editors, and reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Received: June 01, 2023; Revised: August 01, 2023; Accepted: August 01, 2023

*Contact address: Technical University of Ambato. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences. Querochaca Campus. Via Cevallos-Quero, Cevallos. Province of Tungurahua, Ecuador. Los Chasquis Avenue and Guayllabamba River. Tel: +032 523039 ext. 521021. Ambato, Ecuador. María Génesis Almeida Caicedo E-mail address:malmeida8605@uta.edu.ec

Creative Commons License Este es un articulo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons