LITERASI MEDIA DENGAN MEMBERDAYAKAN KEARIFAN LOKAL

AHMAD SIHABUDIN

Abstract


Media literacy is always related to media education. The problem is why is media to perform literacy? It is because our society is heterogeneous; in terms of their ethnicity, religion, infrastructure, education, knowledge, professional background, geography and other factors. This diversity indicator results also in differences of social perspective in grasping each content of media (Potter, 2001). The printing culture drives out the society’s competence to have contact with outside of both their selfness and their collective selfness. It might be helpful as outside information that can be used to repair the life order and structure. Unfortunately, although the importance of cultural literacy is in a consideration, the level of literacy competence of our society is still low. The society is in favor of information being read. The phenomenon in Ignas Kleden’s term is so-called as the secondary orality. Values and norms of local cultures within society can be utilized as the principle guidance for them to access information from new (foreign) media. We should put efforts on how our local wisdom functions as the community filter for media contents. Research and Development Division of Kompas (2011) reports culture is one of the devices through which we can develop a media literate society. This implementation is found in the Samin community at Pati Central Java, through their solid local doctrines they are successful to defend themselves not to imitate behaviors that they are in contact with.

Keywords


literacy; media; local wisdom

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Arifianto. S. 2013. Literasi Media Dan Pemberdayaan Peran KearifanLokal Masyarakat. Peneliti Komunikasi & Budaya Media,di Puslitbang Aptika,& IKP Balitbang SDM Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika.

Hamijoyo, Santoso.S. 1993. Landasan Ilmiah Komunikasi. Pidato Ilmiah. Penerimaan Jabatan Guru Besar Tetap Pada Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi. Surabaya. Universitas DR. Soetomo.

Ibrahim, Idi Subandy, dan Latif, Yudi. 1997. Hegemoni Budaya. Bentang, Yogjakarta.

Ibrahim, Idi Subandy. 1997. Ecstasy Gaya Hidup: Kebudayaan Pop dalam “Masyarakat Komoditas” Indonesia. Penerbit.Mizan. Bandung.

Ishadi, SK. 1994. Era Informasi dan Televisi Transglobal. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pembangunan. Balitbang Depatemen Penerangan. RI. Jakarta. No. 14. 1994.

Masyarakat Rentan Informasi

Serbaneka Media dan Informasi cepat

Masyarakat Informasi Peduli Media

Kearifan Lokal

Literasi Media

Jurnal Communication Vol. 4 No.2 Oktober 2013 9

Shoemaker,Paula J & Stephen D.Reese, 1996, Mediating The Massage Theories of Influence on Mass Media Content, Second Edition,New York : Longman Publishers

Yusanto, Yoki. 2011. Tradisi Komunikasi Anggota kelompok Rendangan Dengan Kepala Adat. Studi Etnografi Komunikasi Dalam Ritual Adat Bulan Purnama Opat Belas di Komunitas Adat Kesepuhan Cisungsang. Kabupaten Lebak. Banten. Thesis. Bandung. Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi. Universitas Padjadjaran.

Gramedia.com/resensi/detail/53/Literasi+Media+%26+Kearifan+Lokal%3A+Konsep+dan+Aplikasi.Litbang Kompas.

http://catatansyamsul.wordpress.com/2012/07/15/pentingnya-menumbuhkan-budaya-literasi suatu-teladan-dari-mendiang-gie/




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.36080/comm.v4i2.55

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Communication

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Visit to our university official website: www.budiluhur.ac.id