Logo-jcvtr
Submitted: 09 Mar 2022
Revision: 11 Oct 2022
Accepted: 13 Oct 2022
ePublished: 26 Nov 2022
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2022;14(4): 228-233.
doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2022.30539
PMID: 36699561
PMCID: PMC9871158
  Abstract View: 347
  PDF Download: 247
  Full Text View: 42

Original Article

Dyspnea in pregnancy might be related to the incomplete physiological adaptation of the heart

Atoosa Mostafavi 1 ORCID logo, Mona Feizian 1 ORCID logo, Seyedeh Zahra Fotook Kiaei 2 ORCID logo, Seyed Abdolhussein Tabatabaei 1* ORCID logo

1 Department of Cardiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Advanced Thoracic research center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Shariati Hospital, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding Author: Seyed Abdol Hussein Tabatabaei, Email: , Email: Tabatabaeiseedah@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Dyspnea is a common complaint in pregnant women with no cardiac and pulmonary diseases. We aimed to assess whether physiological dyspnea of pregnancy was correlated with subtle changes in ventricular systolic and diastolic function.

Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 40 healthy pregnant women in their second and third trimesters with no complaints of dyspnea and 40 healthy pregnant women in the same trimesters with a complaint of dyspnea. Parameters of echocardiography were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Global left ventricular ejection fraction (59.65±6.44 and 58.49±4.95 P=0.418 in patients without and with dyspnea respectively), and global longitudinal strain were not significantly different (18.72±2.90 and 18.94±3.07, P=0.57 in the same order). Global circumferential strain(GCS)was lower in patients with dyspnea. ( 20.19±4.86 vs 22.61±4.69 ,P=0.03). Systolic volume (33.17±8.94 vs 32.63±8.09) and diastolic volume(80.75±18.73 vs 78.37±16.63) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(47.5±4.24 vs 46.23±3.21)were not different (P=0.784, 0.560 and 0.146 respectively) .Left ventricular end-systolic diameter was significantly lower in the case group (32.52±4.66 vs 29.92±4.05, P=0.011). Left atrial area index in the patients with dyspnea was lower.( 8.13±1.42 vs 8.94±1.4, P=0.014) . Other findings were a high E/E’ and high pulmonary artery pressure in the patients with dyspnea.

Conclusion: Dyspnea in pregnant women can be a consequence of incomplete physiological adaptation to volume overload in pregnancy. Lower systolic and diastolic diameters of the left ventricle, left atrial area, and left atrial index may lead to increased filling pressure, manifested by a higher E/E’ ratio and pulmonary artery pressure.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 348

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 247

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View: 42

Your browser does not support the canvas element.